Document-Level Event Extraction via Human-Like Reading Process
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2202.03092v1
- Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2022 12:10:58 GMT
- Title: Document-Level Event Extraction via Human-Like Reading Process
- Authors: Shiyao Cui, Xin Cong, Bowen Yu, Tingwen Liu, Yucheng Wang, Jinqiao Shi
- Abstract summary: Document-level Event Extraction (DEE) is particularly tricky due to the two challenges it poses: scattering-arguments and multi-events.
We propose a method called HRE, where DEE is decomposed into two iterative stages, rough reading and elaborate reading.
Experiment results show the superiority of HRE over prior competitive methods.
- Score: 14.530050659066383
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Document-level Event Extraction (DEE) is particularly tricky due to the two
challenges it poses: scattering-arguments and multi-events. The first challenge
means that arguments of one event record could reside in different sentences in
the document, while the second one reflects one document may simultaneously
contain multiple such event records. Motivated by humans' reading cognitive to
extract information of interests, in this paper, we propose a method called HRE
(Human Reading inspired Extractor for Document Events), where DEE is decomposed
into these two iterative stages, rough reading and elaborate reading.
Specifically, the first stage browses the document to detect the occurrence of
events, and the second stage serves to extract specific event arguments. For
each concrete event role, elaborate reading hierarchically works from sentences
to characters to locate arguments across sentences, thus the
scattering-arguments problem is tackled. Meanwhile, rough reading is explored
in a multi-round manner to discover undetected events, thus the multi-events
problem is handled. Experiment results show the superiority of HRE over prior
competitive methods.
Related papers
- Double Mixture: Towards Continual Event Detection from Speech [60.33088725100812]
Speech event detection is crucial for multimedia retrieval, involving the tagging of both semantic and acoustic events.
This paper tackles two primary challenges in speech event detection: the continual integration of new events without forgetting previous ones, and the disentanglement of semantic from acoustic events.
We propose a novel method, 'Double Mixture,' which merges speech expertise with robust memory mechanisms to enhance adaptability and prevent forgetting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-20T06:32:00Z) - MAVEN-Arg: Completing the Puzzle of All-in-One Event Understanding Dataset with Event Argument Annotation [104.6065882758648]
MAVEN-Arg is the first all-in-one dataset supporting event detection, event argument extraction, and event relation extraction.
As an EAE benchmark, MAVEN-Arg offers three main advantages: (1) a comprehensive schema covering 162 event types and 612 argument roles, all with expert-written definitions and examples; (2) a large data scale, containing 98,591 events and 290,613 arguments obtained with laborious human annotation; and (3) the exhaustive annotation supporting all task variants of EAE.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-15T16:52:14Z) - From Simple to Complex: A Progressive Framework for Document-level
Informative Argument Extraction [34.37013964529546]
Event Argument Extraction (EAE) requires the model to extract arguments of multiple events from a single document.
We propose a simple-to-complex progressive framework for document-level EAE.
Our model outperforms SOTA by 1.4% in F1, indicating the proposed simple-to-complex framework is useful in the EAE task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-25T04:38:02Z) - Unifying Event Detection and Captioning as Sequence Generation via
Pre-Training [53.613265415703815]
We propose a unified pre-training and fine-tuning framework to enhance the inter-task association between event detection and captioning.
Our model outperforms the state-of-the-art methods, and can be further boosted when pre-trained on extra large-scale video-text data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-18T14:18:13Z) - EA$^2$E: Improving Consistency with Event Awareness for Document-Level
Argument Extraction [52.43978926985928]
We introduce the Event-Aware Argument Extraction (EA$2$E) model with augmented context for training and inference.
Experiment results on WIKIEVENTS and ACE2005 datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of EA$2$E.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-30T04:33:51Z) - Reinforcement Learning-based Dialogue Guided Event Extraction to Exploit
Argument Relations [70.35379323231241]
This paper presents a better approach for event extraction by explicitly utilizing the relationships of event arguments.
We employ reinforcement learning and incremental learning to extract multiple arguments via a multi-turned, iterative process.
Experimental results show that our approach consistently outperforms seven state-of-the-art event extraction methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-23T13:24:39Z) - ESTER: A Machine Reading Comprehension Dataset for Event Semantic
Relation Reasoning [49.795767003586235]
We introduce ESTER, a comprehensive machine reading comprehension dataset for Event Semantic Relation Reasoning.
We study five most commonly used event semantic relations and formulate them as question answering tasks.
Experimental results show that the current SOTA systems achieve 60.5%, 57.8%, and 76.3% for event-based F1, token based F1 and HIT@1 scores respectively.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-16T19:59:26Z) - Document-level Event Extraction with Efficient End-to-end Learning of
Cross-event Dependencies [37.96254956540803]
We propose an end-to-end model leveraging Deep Value Networks (DVN), a structured prediction algorithm, to efficiently capture cross-event dependencies for document-level event extraction.
Our approach achieves comparable performance to CRF-based models on ACE05, while enjoys significantly higher computational efficiency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-24T05:28:16Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.