Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses in Neural Network Pruning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2202.03335v1
• Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2022 16:31:53 GMT
• Title: Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses in Neural Network Pruning
• Authors: Xiaoyong Yuan, Lan Zhang
• Abstract summary: We conduct the first analysis of privacy risks in neural network pruning. Specifically, we investigate the impacts of neural network pruning on training data privacy. We propose a new defense mechanism to protect the pruning process by mitigating the prediction divergence.
• Score: 5.856147967309101
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Neural network pruning has been an essential technique to reduce the computation and memory requirements for using deep neural networks for resource-constrained devices. Most existing research focuses primarily on balancing the sparsity and accuracy of a pruned neural network by strategically removing insignificant parameters and retraining the pruned model. Such efforts on reusing training samples pose serious privacy risks due to increased memorization, which, however, has not been investigated yet. In this paper, we conduct the first analysis of privacy risks in neural network pruning. Specifically, we investigate the impacts of neural network pruning on training data privacy, i.e., membership inference attacks. We first explore the impact of neural network pruning on prediction divergence, where the pruning process disproportionately affects the pruned model's behavior for members and non-members. Meanwhile, the influence of divergence even varies among different classes in a fine-grained manner. Enlighten by such divergence, we proposed a self-attention membership inference attack against the pruned neural networks. Extensive experiments are conducted to rigorously evaluate the privacy impacts of different pruning approaches, sparsity levels, and adversary knowledge. The proposed attack shows the higher attack performance on the pruned models when compared with eight existing membership inference attacks. In addition, we propose a new defense mechanism to protect the pruning process by mitigating the prediction divergence based on KL-divergence distance, whose effectiveness has been experimentally demonstrated to effectively mitigate the privacy risks while maintaining the sparsity and accuracy of the pruned models.

Related papers

• Confident magnitude-based neural network pruning [0.0]
  Pruning neural networks has proven to be a successful approach to increase the efficiency and reduce the memory storage of deep learning models. We leverage recent techniques on distribution-free uncertainty quantification to provide finite-sample statistical guarantees to compress deep neural networks. This work presents experiments in computer vision tasks to illustrate how uncertainty-aware pruning is a useful approach to deploy sparse neural networks safely.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T21:29:20Z)
• Investigating Human-Identifiable Features Hidden in Adversarial Perturbations [54.39726653562144]
  Our study explores up to five attack algorithms across three datasets. We identify human-identifiable features in adversarial perturbations. Using pixel-level annotations, we extract such features and demonstrate their ability to compromise target models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-28T22:31:29Z)
• Can pruning improve certified robustness of neural networks? [106.03070538582222]
  We show that neural network pruning can improve empirical robustness of deep neural networks (NNs) Our experiments show that by appropriately pruning an NN, its certified accuracy can be boosted up to 8.2% under standard training. We additionally observe the existence of certified lottery tickets that can match both standard and certified robust accuracies of the original dense models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-15T05:48:51Z)
• Efficient and Robust Classification for Sparse Attacks [34.48667992227529]
  We consider perturbations bounded by the $ell$--norm, which have been shown as effective attacks in the domains of image-recognition, natural language processing, and malware-detection. We propose a novel defense method that consists of "truncation" and "adrial training" Motivated by the insights we obtain, we extend these components to neural network classifiers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-23T21:18:17Z)
• Few-shot Backdoor Defense Using Shapley Estimation [123.56934991060788]
  We develop a new approach called Shapley Pruning to mitigate backdoor attacks on deep neural networks. ShapPruning identifies the few infected neurons (under 1% of all neurons) and manages to protect the model's structure and accuracy. Experiments demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of our method against various attacks and tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-30T02:27:03Z)
• Pruning in the Face of Adversaries [0.0]
  We evaluate the impact of neural network pruning on the adversarial robustness against L-0, L-2 and L-infinity attacks. Our results confirm that neural network pruning and adversarial robustness are not mutually exclusive. We extend our analysis to situations that incorporate additional assumptions on the adversarial scenario and show that depending on the situation, different strategies are optimal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-19T09:06:16Z)
• Residual Error: a New Performance Measure for Adversarial Robustness [85.0371352689919]
  A major challenge that limits the wide-spread adoption of deep learning has been their fragility to adversarial attacks. This study presents the concept of residual error, a new performance measure for assessing the adversarial robustness of a deep neural network. Experimental results using the case of image classification demonstrate the effectiveness and efficacy of the proposed residual error metric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-18T16:34:23Z)
• Improving Adversarial Robustness by Enforcing Local and Global Compactness [19.8818435601131]
  Adversary training is the most successful method that consistently resists a wide range of attacks. We propose the Adversary Divergence Reduction Network which enforces local/global compactness and the clustering assumption. The experimental results demonstrate that augmenting adversarial training with our proposed components can further improve the robustness of the network.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-10T00:43:06Z)
• Feature Purification: How Adversarial Training Performs Robust Deep Learning [66.05472746340142]
  We show a principle that we call Feature Purification, where we show one of the causes of the existence of adversarial examples is the accumulation of certain small dense mixtures in the hidden weights during the training process of a neural network. We present both experiments on the CIFAR-10 dataset to illustrate this principle, and a theoretical result proving that for certain natural classification tasks, training a two-layer neural network with ReLU activation using randomly gradient descent indeed this principle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-20T16:56:08Z)
• Learn2Perturb: an End-to-end Feature Perturbation Learning to Improve Adversarial Robustness [79.47619798416194]
  Learn2Perturb is an end-to-end feature perturbation learning approach for improving the adversarial robustness of deep neural networks. Inspired by the Expectation-Maximization, an alternating back-propagation training algorithm is introduced to train the network and noise parameters consecutively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-02T18:27:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.