Stakeholder utility measures for declarative processes and their use in
process comparisons
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2202.03520v1
- Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2022 21:11:13 GMT
- Title: Stakeholder utility measures for declarative processes and their use in
process comparisons
- Authors: Mark Dukes
- Abstract summary: We present a method for calculating and analyzing stakeholder derivation utilities of processes that arise in, but are not limited to, the social sciences.
This method is quite general and applicable to any situation in which declarative-type constraints of a modal and/or temporal nature play a part.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: We present a method for calculating and analyzing stakeholder utilities of
processes that arise in, but are not limited to, the social sciences. These
areas include business process analysis, healthcare workflow analysis and
policy process analysis. This method is quite general and applicable to any
situation in which declarative-type constraints of a modal and/or temporal
nature play a part.
A declarative process is a process in which activities may freely happen
while respecting a set of constraints. For such a process, anything may happen
so long as it is not explicitly forbidden. Declarative processes have been used
and studied as models of business and healthcare workflows by several authors.
In considering a declarative process as a model of some system it is natural to
consider how the process behaves with respect to stakeholders. We derive a
measure for stakeholder utility that can be applied in a very general setting.
This derivation is achieved by listing a collection a properties which we argue
such a stakeholder utility function ought to satisfy, and then using these to
show a very specific form must hold for such a utility. The utility measure
depends on the set of unique traces of the declarative process, and calculating
this set requires a combinatorial analysis of the declarative graph that
represents the process.
This builds on previous work of the author wherein the combinatorial
diversity metrics for declarative processes were derived for use in policy
process analysis. The collection of stakeholder utilities can themselves then
be used to form a metric with which we can compare different declarative
processes to one another. These are illustrated using several examples of
declarative processes that already exist in the literature.
Related papers
- Likelihood as a Performance Gauge for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [78.28197013467157]
We show that likelihoods serve as an effective gauge for language model performance.
We propose two methods that use question likelihood as a gauge for selecting and constructing prompts that lead to better performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-12T13:14:09Z) - Enjoy the Silence: Analysis of Stochastic Petri Nets with Silent
Transitions [4.163635746713724]
Capturing behaviors in business and work processes is essential to quantitatively understand how nondeterminism is resolved when taking decisions within the process.
This is of special interest in process mining, where event data tracking the actual execution of the process are related to process models.
Variants of Petri nets provide a natural formal basis for this, but they need to be labelled with (possibly duplicated) activities and equipped with silent transitions.
We show that all such analysis tasks can be solved analytically, in particular reducing them to a single method that combines automata-based techniques to single out the behaviors of interest within a LSP
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-10T07:57:24Z) - Measuring Rule-based LTLf Process Specifications: A Probabilistic
Data-driven Approach [2.5407767658470726]
Declarative process specifications define the behavior of processes by means of rules based on Linear Temporal Logic on Finite Traces.
In a mining context, these specifications are inferred from, and checked on, multi-sets of runs recorded by information systems.
We propose a technique that measures the degree of satisfaction of specifications over event logs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-09T13:07:01Z) - Chain of Thought Imitation with Procedure Cloning [129.62135987416164]
We propose procedure cloning, which applies supervised sequence prediction to imitate the series of expert computations.
We show that imitating the intermediate computations of an expert's behavior enables procedure cloning to learn policies exhibiting significant generalization to unseen environment configurations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-22T13:14:09Z) - OPerA: Object-Centric Performance Analysis [0.4014524824655105]
We propose a novel approach to performance analysis by using object-centric Petri nets as formal representations of business processes.
The proposed approach correctly computes existing performance metrics, while supporting the derivation of newly-introduced object-centric performance metrics.
We have implemented the approach as a web application and conducted a case study based on a real-life loan application process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-22T12:23:06Z) - Prescriptive Process Monitoring: Quo Vadis? [64.39761523935613]
The paper studies existing methods in this field via a Systematic Literature Review ( SLR)
The SLR provides insights into challenges and areas for future research that could enhance the usefulness and applicability of prescriptive process monitoring methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-03T08:06:24Z) - Exploring Business Process Deviance with Sequential and Declarative
Patterns [3.039637436705478]
Deviance mining is concerned with uncovering the reasons for deviant executions by analyzing event logs stored by the systems supporting the execution of a business process.
The problem of explaining deviations in business processes is first investigated by using features based on sequential and declarative patterns.
The explanations are then extracted by direct and indirect methods for rule induction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-24T12:16:07Z) - Process Comparison Using Object-Centric Process Cubes [69.68068088508505]
In real-life business processes, different behaviors exist that make the overall process too complex to interpret.
Process comparison is a branch of process mining that isolates different behaviors of the process from each other by using process cubes.
We propose a process cube framework, which supports process cube operations such as slice and dice on object-centric event logs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-12T10:08:28Z) - Analogous Process Structure Induction for Sub-event Sequence Prediction [111.10887596684276]
We propose an Analogous Process Structure Induction APSI framework to predict the whole sub-event sequence of previously unseen processes.
As our experiments and analysis indicate, APSI supports the generation of meaningful sub-event sequences for unseen processes and can help predict missing events.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-16T17:35:40Z) - Combinatorial diversity metrics for the analysis of policy processes [0.0]
We introduce a class of traces, called first-passage traces, to represent the different executions of the declarative processes.
Heuristics of what properties a diversity measure of such processes ought to satisfy are used to derive two different metrics for these processes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-19T19:46:29Z) - Process Discovery for Structured Program Synthesis [70.29027202357385]
A core task in process mining is process discovery which aims to learn an accurate process model from event log data.
In this paper, we propose to use (block-) structured programs directly as target process models.
We develop a novel bottom-up agglomerative approach to the discovery of such structured program process models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-13T10:33:10Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.