"I feel invaded, annoyed, anxious and I may protect myself": Individuals' Feelings about Online Tracking and their Protective Behaviour across Gender and Country

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2202.04682v1
• Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 19:08:14 GMT
• Title: "I feel invaded, annoyed, anxious and I may protect myself": Individuals' Feelings about Online Tracking and their Protective Behaviour across Gender and Country
• Authors: Kovila P.L. Coopamootoo, Maryam Mehrnezhad, Ehsan Toreini
• Abstract summary: Online tracking is a primary concern for Internet users, yet previous research has not found a clear link between the cognitive understanding of tracking and protective actions. We conducted an online study, with N=614 participants, across the UK, Germany and France, to investigate how users feel about third-party tracking. We found that most participants' feelings about tracking were negative, described as deeply intrusive. We also observed indications of a privacy gender gap', where women feel more negatively about tracking, yet are less likely to take protective actions, compared to men.
• Score: 11.38723572165938
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Online tracking is a primary concern for Internet users, yet previous research has not found a clear link between the cognitive understanding of tracking and protective actions. We postulate that protective behaviour follows affective evaluation of tracking. We conducted an online study, with N=614 participants, across the UK, Germany and France, to investigate how users feel about third-party tracking and what protective actions they take. We found that most participants' feelings about tracking were negative, described as deeply intrusive - beyond the informational sphere, including feelings of annoyance and anxiety, that predict protective actions. We also observed indications of a `privacy gender gap', where women feel more negatively about tracking, yet are less likely to take protective actions, compared to men. And less UK individuals report negative feelings and protective actions, compared to those from Germany and France. This paper contributes insights into the affective evaluation of privacy threats and how it predicts protective behaviour. It also provides a discussion on the implications of these findings for various stakeholders, make recommendations and outline avenues for future work.

Related papers

• A Survey of Privacy-Preserving Model Explanations: Privacy Risks, Attacks, and Countermeasures [50.987594546912725]
  Despite a growing corpus of research in AI privacy and explainability, there is little attention on privacy-preserving model explanations. This article presents the first thorough survey about privacy attacks on model explanations and their countermeasures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-31T12:44:48Z)
• Women are less comfortable expressing opinions online than men and report heightened fears for safety: Surveying gender differences in experiences of online harms [0.7916214711737172]
  Women are significantly more fearful of being targeted by harms overall. They report greater negative psychological impact as a result of particular experiences. Women report higher use of a range of safety tools and less comfort with several forms of online participation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-27T22:16:03Z)
• PsySafe: A Comprehensive Framework for Psychological-based Attack, Defense, and Evaluation of Multi-agent System Safety [73.51336434996931]
  Multi-agent systems, when enhanced with Large Language Models (LLMs), exhibit profound capabilities in collective intelligence. However, the potential misuse of this intelligence for malicious purposes presents significant risks. We propose a framework (PsySafe) grounded in agent psychology, focusing on identifying how dark personality traits in agents can lead to risky behaviors. Our experiments reveal several intriguing phenomena, such as the collective dangerous behaviors among agents, agents' self-reflection when engaging in dangerous behavior, and the correlation between agents' psychological assessments and dangerous behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-22T12:11:55Z)
• Privacy Perceptions and Behaviors of Google Personal Account Holders in Saudi Arabia [10.999549381629839]
  We interviewed 30 Google personal account holders in Saudi Arabia about their privacy perceptions and behaviors. Our results show that although most participants have some level of awareness about Google's data practices, many have only vague awareness. While many participants find Google's use of their data to improve the services provided to them acceptable, the majority find the use of their data for ad purposes unacceptable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-20T03:25:18Z)
• Sex differences in attitudes towards online privacy and anonymity among Israeli students with different technical backgrounds [0.6445605125467572]
  Our aim was to comparatively model men and women's online privacy attitudes. Various factors related to the user's online privacy and anonymity were considered. Users' tendency to engage in privacy paradox behaviour was not higher among men despite their higher level of technological online privacy literacy compared to women.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-07T12:36:37Z)
• Protecting User Privacy in Online Settings via Supervised Learning [69.38374877559423]
  We design an intelligent approach to online privacy protection that leverages supervised learning. By detecting and blocking data collection that might infringe on a user's privacy, we can restore a degree of digital privacy to the user.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-06T05:20:16Z)
• The Privacy Onion Effect: Memorization is Relative [76.46529413546725]
  We show an Onion Effect of memorization: removing the "layer" of outlier points that are most vulnerable exposes a new layer of previously-safe points to the same attack. It suggests that privacy-enhancing technologies such as machine unlearning could actually harm the privacy of other users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-21T15:25:56Z)
• Learning Language and Multimodal Privacy-Preserving Markers of Mood from Mobile Data [74.60507696087966]
  Mental health conditions remain underdiagnosed even in countries with common access to advanced medical care. One promising data source to help monitor human behavior is daily smartphone usage. We study behavioral markers of daily mood using a recent dataset of mobile behaviors from adolescent populations at high risk of suicidal behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-24T17:46:03Z)
• Differential Tracking Across Topical Webpages of Indian News Media [3.721918008485747]
  We propose a novel method for automatic extraction and categorization of Indian news topical subpages based on the details in their URLs. We find differential user tracking among subpages, and between subpages and homepages. embedded third-parties tend to track specific subpages simultaneously, revealing possible user profiling in action.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-07T20:20:47Z)
• What breach? Measuring online awareness of security incidents by studying real-world browsing behavior [9.750563575752956]
  This paper examines how often people read about security incidents online. We find that only 16% of participants visited any web pages related to six widely publicized large-scale security incidents. More severe incidents as well as articles that constructively spoke about the incident inspired more action.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T20:34:19Z)
• Robust Tracking against Adversarial Attacks [69.59717023941126]
  We first attempt to generate adversarial examples on top of video sequences to improve the tracking robustness against adversarial attacks. We apply the proposed adversarial attack and defense approaches to state-of-the-art deep tracking algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-20T08:05:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.