Corralling a Larger Band of Bandits: A Case Study on Switching Regret for Linear Bandits

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2202.06151v1
• Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2022 21:55:44 GMT
• Title: Corralling a Larger Band of Bandits: A Case Study on Switching Regret for Linear Bandits
• Authors: Haipeng Luo, Mengxiao Zhang, Peng Zhao, Zhi-Hua Zhou
• Abstract summary: We consider the problem of combining and learning over a set of adversarial algorithms with the goal of adaptively tracking the best one on the fly. The CORRAL of Agarwal et al. achieves this goal with a regret overhead of order $widetildeO(sqrtd S T)$ where $M$ is the number of base algorithms and $T$ is the time horizon. Motivated by this issue, we propose a new recipe to corral a larger band of bandit algorithms whose regret overhead has only emphlogarithmic dependence on $M$ as long
• Score: 99.86860277006318
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We consider the problem of combining and learning over a set of adversarial bandit algorithms with the goal of adaptively tracking the best one on the fly. The CORRAL algorithm of Agarwal et al. (2017) and its variants (Foster et al., 2020a) achieve this goal with a regret overhead of order $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{MT})$ where $M$ is the number of base algorithms and $T$ is the time horizon. The polynomial dependence on $M$, however, prevents one from applying these algorithms to many applications where $M$ is poly$(T)$ or even larger. Motivated by this issue, we propose a new recipe to corral a larger band of bandit algorithms whose regret overhead has only \emph{logarithmic} dependence on $M$ as long as some conditions are satisfied. As the main example, we apply our recipe to the problem of adversarial linear bandits over a $d$-dimensional $\ell_p$ unit-ball for $p \in (1,2]$. By corralling a large set of $T$ base algorithms, each starting at a different time step, our final algorithm achieves the first optimal switching regret $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{d S T})$ when competing against a sequence of comparators with $S$ switches (for some known $S$). We further extend our results to linear bandits over a smooth and strongly convex domain as well as unconstrained linear bandits.

Related papers

• Efficient Algorithms for Generalized Linear Bandits with Heavy-tailed Rewards [40.99322897009357]
  We propose two novel algorithms based on truncation and mean of medians. Our truncation-based algorithm supports online learning, distinguishing it from existing truncation-based approaches. Our algorithms improve the regret bounds by a logarithmic factor compared to existing algorithms when $epsilon=1$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-28T13:01:10Z)
• An Asymptotically Optimal Batched Algorithm for the Dueling Bandit Problem [13.69077222007053]
  We study the $K$-armed dueling bandit problem, a variation of the traditional multi-armed bandit problem in which feedback is obtained in the form of pairwise comparisons. We obtain regret of $O(K2log(K)) + O(Klog(T))$ in $O(log(T))$ rounds, where $T$ is the time horizon. In computational experiments over a variety of real-world datasets, we observe that our algorithm using $O(log(T))$ rounds achieves almost the same performance as fully
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-25T00:23:55Z)
• Variance-Aware Sparse Linear Bandits [64.70681598741417]
  Worst-case minimax regret for sparse linear bandits is $widetildeThetaleft(sqrtdTright)$. In the benign setting where there is no noise and the action set is the unit sphere, one can use divide-and-conquer to achieve an $widetildemathcal O(1)$ regret. We develop a general framework that converts any variance-aware linear bandit algorithm to a variance-aware algorithm for sparse linear bandits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-26T15:55:44Z)
• Logarithmic Regret from Sublinear Hints [76.87432703516942]
  We show that an algorithm can obtain $O(log T)$ regret with just $O(sqrtT)$ hints under a natural query model. We also show that $o(sqrtT)$ hints cannot guarantee better than $Omega(sqrtT)$ regret.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-09T16:50:18Z)
• Optimal Regret Algorithm for Pseudo-1d Bandit Convex Optimization [51.23789922123412]
  We study online learning with bandit feedback (i.e. learner has access to only zeroth-order oracle) where cost/reward functions admit a "pseudo-1d" structure. We show a lower bound of $min(sqrtdT, T3/4)$ for the regret of any algorithm, where $T$ is the number of rounds. We propose a new algorithm sbcalg that combines randomized online gradient descent with a kernelized exponential weights method to exploit the pseudo-1d structure effectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-15T08:16:51Z)
• Impact of Representation Learning in Linear Bandits [83.17684841392754]
  We study how representation learning can improve the efficiency of bandit problems. We present a new algorithm which achieves $widetildeO(TsqrtkN + sqrtdkNT)$ regret, where $N$ is the number of rounds we play for each bandit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-13T16:35:30Z)
• Stochastic Bandits with Linear Constraints [69.757694218456]
  We study a constrained contextual linear bandit setting, where the goal of the agent is to produce a sequence of policies. We propose an upper-confidence bound algorithm for this problem, called optimistic pessimistic linear bandit (OPLB)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-17T22:32:19Z)
• Low-Rank Generalized Linear Bandit Problems [19.052901817304743]
  In a low-rank linear bandit problem, the reward of an action is the inner product between the action and an unknown low-rank matrix $Theta*$. We propose an algorithm based on a novel combination of online-to-confidence-set conversioncitepabbasi2012online and the exponentially weighted average forecaster constructed by a covering of low-rank matrices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-04T15:30:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.