What Do They Capture? -- A Structural Analysis of Pre-Trained Language Models for Source Code

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2202.06840v1
• Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 16:22:10 GMT
• Title: What Do They Capture? -- A Structural Analysis of Pre-Trained Language Models for Source Code
• Authors: Yao Wan, Wei Zhao, Hongyu Zhang, Yulei Sui, Guandong Xu, Hai Jin
• Abstract summary: Pre-trained language models for source code have been proposed to model the context of code. These models leverage masked pre-training and Transformer. It is not clear why these models work and what feature correlations they can capture.
• Score: 32.345301158791045
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recently, many pre-trained language models for source code have been proposed to model the context of code and serve as a basis for downstream code intelligence tasks such as code completion, code search, and code summarization. These models leverage masked pre-training and Transformer and have achieved promising results. However, currently there is still little progress regarding interpretability of existing pre-trained code models. It is not clear why these models work and what feature correlations they can capture. In this paper, we conduct a thorough structural analysis aiming to provide an interpretation of pre-trained language models for source code (e.g., CodeBERT, and GraphCodeBERT) from three distinctive perspectives: (1) attention analysis, (2) probing on the word embedding, and (3) syntax tree induction. Through comprehensive analysis, this paper reveals several insightful findings that may inspire future studies: (1) Attention aligns strongly with the syntax structure of code. (2) Pre-training language models of code can preserve the syntax structure of code in the intermediate representations of each Transformer layer. (3) The pre-trained models of code have the ability of inducing syntax trees of code. Theses findings suggest that it may be helpful to incorporate the syntax structure of code into the process of pre-training for better code representations.

Related papers

• Code Execution with Pre-trained Language Models [88.04688617516827]
  Most pre-trained models for code intelligence ignore the execution trace and only rely on source code and syntactic structures. We develop a mutation-based data augmentation technique to create a large-scale and realistic Python dataset and task for code execution. We then present CodeExecutor, a Transformer model that leverages code execution pre-training and curriculum learning to enhance its semantic comprehension.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-08T10:00:05Z)
• Unveiling Code Pre-Trained Models: Investigating Syntax and Semantics Capacities [34.27541293716398]
  We extensively analyze seven code models to investigate how code models represent code syntax and semantics. We have developed four probing tasks to evaluate the models' abilities to learn code syntax and semantics. Our results emphasize the strengths and weaknesses of various code models in mastering code syntax and semantics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T06:15:17Z)
• CodeExp: Explanatory Code Document Generation [94.43677536210465]
  Existing code-to-text generation models produce only high-level summaries of code. We conduct a human study to identify the criteria for high-quality explanatory docstring for code. We present a multi-stage fine-tuning strategy and baseline models for the task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-25T18:05:44Z)
• Soft-Labeled Contrastive Pre-training for Function-level Code Representation [127.71430696347174]
  We present textbfSCodeR, a textbfSoft-labeled contrastive pre-training framework with two positive sample construction methods. Considering the relevance between codes in a large-scale code corpus, the soft-labeled contrastive pre-training can obtain fine-grained soft-labels. SCodeR achieves new state-of-the-art performance on four code-related tasks over seven datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-18T05:17:37Z)
• CodeRetriever: Unimodal and Bimodal Contrastive Learning [128.06072658302165]
  We propose the CodeRetriever model, which combines the unimodal and bimodal contrastive learning to train function-level code semantic representations. For unimodal contrastive learning, we design a semantic-guided method to build positive code pairs based on the documentation and function name. For bimodal contrastive learning, we leverage the documentation and in-line comments of code to build text-code pairs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-26T10:54:30Z)
• Contrastive Learning for Source Code with Structural and Functional Properties [66.10710134948478]
  We present BOOST, a novel self-supervised model to focus pre-training based on the characteristics of source code. We employ automated, structure-guided code transformation algorithms that generate functionally equivalent code that looks drastically different from the original one. We train our model in a way that brings the functionally equivalent code closer and distinct code further through a contrastive learning objective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-08T02:56:43Z)
• CLSEBERT: Contrastive Learning for Syntax Enhanced Code Pre-Trained Model [23.947178895479464]
  We propose CLSEBERT, a Constrastive Learning Framework for Syntax Enhanced Code Pre-Trained Model. In the pre-training stage, we consider the code syntax and hierarchy contained in the Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) We also introduce two novel pre-training objectives. One is to predict the edges between nodes in the abstract syntax tree, and the other is to predict the types of code tokens.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-10T10:08:21Z)
• GraphCodeBERT: Pre-training Code Representations with Data Flow [97.00641522327699]
  We present GraphCodeBERT, a pre-trained model for programming language that considers the inherent structure of code. We use data flow in the pre-training stage, which is a semantic-level structure of code that encodes the relation of "where-the-value-comes-from" between variables. We evaluate our model on four tasks, including code search, clone detection, code translation, and code refinement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-17T15:25:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.