Inclusive Study Group Formation At Scale

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2202.07439v3
• Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 09:25:22 GMT
• Title: Inclusive Study Group Formation At Scale
• Authors: Sumer Kohli, Neelesh Ramachandran, Ana Tudor, Gloria Tumushabe, Olivia Hsu, Gireeja Ranade
• Abstract summary: We present a scalable system that removes structural obstacles faced by underrepresented students. We aim to provide students from underrepresented groups an experience that is similar in quality to that of students from majority groups.
• Score: 3.5981839346635125
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Underrepresented students face many significant challenges in their education. In particular, they often have a harder time than their peers from majority groups in building long-term high-quality study groups. This challenge is exacerbated in remote-learning scenarios, where students are unable to meet face-to-face and must rely on pre-existing networks for social support. We present a scalable system that removes structural obstacles faced by underrepresented students and supports all students in building inclusive and flexible study groups. One of our main goals is to make the traditionally informal and unstructured process of finding study groups for homework more equitable by providing a uniform but lightweight structure. We aim to provide students from underrepresented groups an experience that is similar in quality to that of students from majority groups. Our process is unique in that it allows students the opportunity to request group reassignments during the semester if they wish. Unlike other collaboration tools our system is not mandatory and does not use peer-evaluation. We trialed our approach in a 1000+ student introductory Engineering and Computer Science course that was conducted entirely online during the COVID-19 pandemic. We find that students from underrepresented backgrounds were more likely to ask for group-matching support compared to students from majority groups. At the same time, underrepresented students that we matched into study groups had group experiences that were comparable to students we matched from majority groups. B-range students in high-comfort and high-quality groups had improved learning outcomes.

Related papers

• The Impact of Group Discussion and Formation on Student Performance: An Experience Report in a Large CS1 Course [10.04958142789079]
  The impact of group discussion and formation mechanisms on student performance remains unclear. We employed both random and expertise-balanced grouping methods to examine the efficacy of different group mechanisms. Our analysis revealed that different grouping methods did not significantly influence discussion engagement or poor-performing students' improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-26T20:07:44Z)
• Gaining Insights into Group-Level Course Difficulty via Differential Course Functioning [3.9829166809129095]
  This study introduces Differential Course Functioning (DCF) as an Item Response Theory (IRT)-based CA methodology. DCF controls for student performance levels and examines whether significant differences exist in how distinct student groups succeed in a course.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-07T14:19:11Z)
• Identification of cohesive subgroups in a university hall of residence during the COVID-19 pandemic using a social network analysis approach [0.0]
  During the COVID-19 pandemic, young university students have experienced significant changes in their relationships. Previous research has shown the importance of relationship structure in contagion processes. The study provides evidence on the importance of gender, race and the building where they live in creating network structures that favor, or not, contagion during a pandemic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-14T14:48:28Z)
• Fair and skill-diverse student group formation via constrained k-way graph partitioning [65.29889537564455]
  This work introduces an unsupervised algorithm for fair and skill-diverse student group formation. The skill sets of students are determined using unsupervised dimensionality reduction of course mark data via the Laplacian eigenmap. The problem is formulated as a constrained graph partitioning problem, whereby the diversity of skill sets in each group are maximised.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-12T14:02:49Z)
• Outlier-Robust Group Inference via Gradient Space Clustering [50.87474101594732]
  Existing methods can improve the worst-group performance, but they require group annotations, which are often expensive and sometimes infeasible to obtain. We address the problem of learning group annotations in the presence of outliers by clustering the data in the space of gradients of the model parameters. We show that data in the gradient space has a simpler structure while preserving information about minority groups and outliers, making it suitable for standard clustering methods like DBSCAN.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-13T06:04:43Z)
• Federated Selective Aggregation for Knowledge Amalgamation [66.94340185846686]
  The goal of FedSA is to train a student model for a new task with the help of several decentralized teachers. Our motivation for investigating such a problem setup stems from a recent dilemma of model sharing. The proposed FedSA offers a solution to this dilemma and makes it one step further since, again, the learned student may specialize in a new task different from all of the teachers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-27T05:36:50Z)
• Multiple Fairness and Cardinality constraints for Students-Topics Grouping Problem [14.051419173519308]
  Group work is a prevalent activity in educational settings, where students are often divided into topic-specific groups based on their preferences. We introduce the multi-fair capacitated (MFC) grouping problem that fairly partitions students into non-overlapping groups. We propose two approaches: a method and a knapsack-based method to obtain the grouping.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-20T17:06:10Z)
• Disadvantaged students increase their academic performance through collective intelligence exposure in emergency remote learning due to COVID 19 [105.54048699217668]
  During the COVID-19 crisis, educational institutions worldwide shifted from face-to-face instruction to emergency remote teaching (ERT) modalities. We analyzed data on 7,528 undergraduate students and found that cooperative and consensus dynamics among students in discussion forums positively affect their final GPA. Using natural language processing, we show that first-year students with low academic performance during high school are exposed to more content-intensive posts in discussion forums.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-10T20:23:38Z)
• Towards Group Robustness in the presence of Partial Group Labels [61.33713547766866]
  spurious correlations between input samples and the target labels wrongly direct the neural network predictions. We propose an algorithm that optimize for the worst-off group assignments from a constraint set. We show improvements in the minority group's performance while preserving overall aggregate accuracy across groups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-10T22:04:48Z)
• Collaborative Group Learning [42.31194030839819]
  Collaborative learning has successfully applied knowledge transfer to guide a pool of small student networks towards robust local minima. Previous approaches typically struggle with drastically aggravated student homogenization when the number of students rises. We propose Collaborative Group Learning, an efficient framework that aims to diversify the feature representation and conduct an effective regularization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-16T14:34:39Z)
• Revealing the Hidden Patterns: A Comparative Study on Profiling Subpopulations of MOOC Students [61.58283466715385]
  Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) exhibit a remarkable heterogeneity of students. The advent of complex "big data" from MOOC platforms is a challenging yet rewarding opportunity to deeply understand how students are engaged in MOOCs. We report on clustering analysis of student activities and comparative analysis on both behavioral patterns and demographical patterns between student subpopulations in the MOOC.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-12T10:38:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.