A General Framework for Modelling Conditional Reasoning -- Preliminary Report

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2202.07596v1
• Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 17:33:39 GMT
• Title: A General Framework for Modelling Conditional Reasoning -- Preliminary Report
• Authors: Giovanni Casini, Umberto Straccia
• Abstract summary: We introduce and investigate here a formalisation for conditionals that allows the definition of a broad class of reasoning systems. This framework covers the most popular kinds of conditional reasoning in logic-based KR.
• Score: 4.340338299803562
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We introduce and investigate here a formalisation for conditionals that allows the definition of a broad class of reasoning systems. This framework covers the most popular kinds of conditional reasoning in logic-based KR: the semantics we propose is appropriate for a structural analysis of those conditionals that do not satisfy closure properties associated to classical logics.

Related papers

• A Primer for Preferential Non-Monotonic Propositional Team Logics [0.0]
  We show that team-based propositional logics naturally give rise to cumulative non-monotonic entailment relations. Motivated by the non-classical interpretation of disjunction in team semantics, we give a precise characterization for preferential models for propositional dependence logic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-11T09:53:15Z)
• An Encoding of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks into Higher-Order Logic [57.24311218570012]
  This approach allows for the computer-assisted analysis of abstract dialectical frameworks. Exemplary applications include the formal analysis and verification of meta-theoretical properties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-08T09:32:26Z)
• Modeling Hierarchical Reasoning Chains by Linking Discourse Units and Key Phrases for Reading Comprehension [80.99865844249106]
  We propose a holistic graph network (HGN) which deals with context at both discourse level and word level, as the basis for logical reasoning. Specifically, node-level and type-level relations, which can be interpreted as bridges in the reasoning process, are modeled by a hierarchical interaction mechanism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-21T07:34:27Z)
• MetaLogic: Logical Reasoning Explanations with Fine-Grained Structure [129.8481568648651]
  We propose a benchmark to investigate models' logical reasoning capabilities in complex real-life scenarios. Based on the multi-hop chain of reasoning, the explanation form includes three main components. We evaluate the current best models' performance on this new explanation form.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-22T16:01:13Z)
• Discourse-Aware Graph Networks for Textual Logical Reasoning [142.0097357999134]
  Passage-level logical relations represent entailment or contradiction between propositional units (e.g., a concluding sentence) We propose logic structural-constraint modeling to solve the logical reasoning QA and introduce discourse-aware graph networks (DAGNs) The networks first construct logic graphs leveraging in-line discourse connectives and generic logic theories, then learn logic representations by end-to-end evolving the logic relations with an edge-reasoning mechanism and updating the graph features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-04T14:38:49Z)
• Granular Generalized Variable Precision Rough Sets and Rational Approximations [0.24366811507669117]
  Granular approximations as per the procedures of VPRS are likely to be more rational than those constructed from a classical perspective under certain conditions. meta applications to cluster validation, image segmentation and dynamic sorting are invented.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-28T08:08:26Z)
• A Formalisation of Abstract Argumentation in Higher-Order Logic [77.34726150561087]
  We present an approach for representing abstract argumentation frameworks based on an encoding into classical higher-order logic. This provides a uniform framework for computer-assisted assessment of abstract argumentation frameworks using interactive and automated reasoning tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-18T10:45:59Z)
• Thinking About Causation: A Causal Language with Epistemic Operators [58.720142291102135]
  We extend the notion of a causal model with a representation of the state of an agent. On the side of the object language, we add operators to express knowledge and the act of observing new information. We provide a sound and complete axiomatization of the logic, and discuss the relation of this framework to causal team semantics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-30T12:16:45Z)
• Reasoning about Typicality and Probabilities in Preferential Description Logics [0.15749416770494704]
  We describe preferential Description Logics of typicality, a nonmonotonic extension of standard Description Logics by means of a typicality operator T. This extension is based on a minimal model semantics corresponding to a notion of rational closure. We consider other strengthening of the rational closure semantics and construction to avoid the so-called blocking of property inheritance problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-20T14:50:31Z)
• Modeling Contrary-to-Duty with CP-nets [19.561116525421316]
  Conditional preference nets (CP-nets) are a compact formalism to express and analyse ceteris paribus preferences. This paper shows how deontic concepts can be captured through conditional preference models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-23T18:23:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.