Memorize to Generalize: on the Necessity of Interpolation in High Dimensional Linear Regression

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2202.09889v1
• Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2022 18:51:45 GMT
• Title: Memorize to Generalize: on the Necessity of Interpolation in High Dimensional Linear Regression
• Authors: Chen Cheng, John Duchi, Rohith Kuditipudi
• Abstract summary: achieve optimal predictive risk in machine learning problems requires interpolating the training data. We characterize how prediction (test) error necessarily scales with training error in this setting. optimal performance requires fitting training data to substantially higher accuracy than the inherent noise floor of the problem.
• Score: 6.594338220264161
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We examine the necessity of interpolation in overparameterized models, that is, when achieving optimal predictive risk in machine learning problems requires (nearly) interpolating the training data. In particular, we consider simple overparameterized linear regression $y = X \theta + w$ with random design $X \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times d}$ under the proportional asymptotics $d/n \to \gamma \in (1, \infty)$. We precisely characterize how prediction (test) error necessarily scales with training error in this setting. An implication of this characterization is that as the label noise variance $\sigma^2 \to 0$, any estimator that incurs at least $\mathsf{c}\sigma^4$ training error for some constant $\mathsf{c}$ is necessarily suboptimal and will suffer growth in excess prediction error at least linear in the training error. Thus, optimal performance requires fitting training data to substantially higher accuracy than the inherent noise floor of the problem.

Related papers

• Scaling Laws in Linear Regression: Compute, Parameters, and Data [86.48154162485712]
  We study the theory of scaling laws in an infinite dimensional linear regression setup. We show that the reducible part of the test error is $Theta(-(a-1) + N-(a-1)/a)$. Our theory is consistent with the empirical neural scaling laws and verified by numerical simulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-12T17:53:29Z)
• Precise Learning Curves and Higher-Order Scaling Limits for Dot Product Kernel Regression [41.48538038768993]
  We focus on the problem of kernel ridge regression for dot-product kernels. We observe a peak in the learning curve whenever $m approx dr/r!$ for any integer $r$, leading to multiple sample-wise descent and nontrivial behavior at multiple scales.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-30T04:21:31Z)
• $p$-Generalized Probit Regression and Scalable Maximum Likelihood Estimation via Sketching and Coresets [74.37849422071206]
  We study the $p$-generalized probit regression model, which is a generalized linear model for binary responses. We show how the maximum likelihood estimator for $p$-generalized probit regression can be approximated efficiently up to a factor of $(1+varepsilon)$ on large data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-25T10:54:41Z)
• Minimax Optimal Quantization of Linear Models: Information-Theoretic Limits and Efficient Algorithms [59.724977092582535]
  We consider the problem of quantizing a linear model learned from measurements. We derive an information-theoretic lower bound for the minimax risk under this setting. We show that our method and upper-bounds can be extended for two-layer ReLU neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-23T02:39:04Z)
• SLOE: A Faster Method for Statistical Inference in High-Dimensional Logistic Regression [68.66245730450915]
  We develop an improved method for debiasing predictions and estimating frequentist uncertainty for practical datasets. Our main contribution is SLOE, an estimator of the signal strength with convergence guarantees that reduces the computation time of estimation and inference by orders of magnitude.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-23T17:48:56Z)
• Max-Linear Regression by Convex Programming [5.366354612549172]
  We formulate and analyze a scalable convex program given by anchored regression (AR) as the estimator for the max-linear regression problem. Our result shows a sufficient number of noise-free observations for exact recovery scales as $k4p$ up to a logarithmic factor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-12T00:55:54Z)
• Learning to extrapolate using continued fractions: Predicting the critical temperature of superconductor materials [5.905364646955811]
  In the field of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML), the approximation of unknown target functions $y=f(mathbfx)$ is a common objective. We refer to $S$ as the training set and aim to identify a low-complexity mathematical model that can effectively approximate this target function for new instances $mathbfx$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-27T04:57:40Z)
• Large-time asymptotics in deep learning [0.0]
  We consider the impact of the final time $T$ (which may indicate the depth of a corresponding ResNet) in training. For the classical $L2$--regularized empirical risk minimization problem, we show that the training error is at most of the order $mathcalOleft(frac1Tright)$. In the setting of $ellp$--distance losses, we prove that both the training error and the optimal parameters are at most of the order $mathcalOleft(e-mu
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-06T07:33:17Z)
• Optimal Robust Linear Regression in Nearly Linear Time [97.11565882347772]
  We study the problem of high-dimensional robust linear regression where a learner is given access to $n$ samples from the generative model $Y = langle X,w* rangle + epsilon$ We propose estimators for this problem under two settings: (i) $X$ is L4-L2 hypercontractive, $mathbbE [XXtop]$ has bounded condition number and $epsilon$ has bounded variance and (ii) $X$ is sub-Gaussian with identity second moment and $epsilon$ is
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-16T06:44:44Z)
• Understanding and Mitigating the Tradeoff Between Robustness and Accuracy [88.51943635427709]
  Adversarial training augments the training set with perturbations to improve the robust error. We show that the standard error could increase even when the augmented perturbations have noiseless observations from the optimal linear predictor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-25T08:03:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.