UX Research on Conversational Human-AI Interaction: A Literature Review
of the ACM Digital Library
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2202.09895v1
- Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2022 19:27:45 GMT
- Title: UX Research on Conversational Human-AI Interaction: A Literature Review
of the ACM Digital Library
- Authors: Qingxiao Zheng, Yiliu Tang, Yiren Liu, Weizi Liu, Yun Huang
- Abstract summary: We conduct a review of literature of ACM publications and identify a set of works that conducted UX (user experience) research.
We qualitatively synthesize the effects of polyadic CAs into four aspects of human-human interactions, i.e., communication, engagement, connection, and relationship maintenance.
Our findings show that designing with social boundaries, such as privacy, disclosure, and identification, is crucial for ethical polyadic CAs.
- Score: 3.774026907596324
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Early conversational agents (CAs) focused on dyadic human-AI interaction
between humans and the CAs, followed by the increasing popularity of polyadic
human-AI interaction, in which CAs are designed to mediate human-human
interactions. CAs for polyadic interactions are unique because they encompass
hybrid social interactions, i.e., human-CA, human-to-human, and human-to-group
behaviors. However, research on polyadic CAs is scattered across different
fields, making it challenging to identify, compare, and accumulate existing
knowledge. To promote the future design of CA systems, we conducted a
literature review of ACM publications and identified a set of works that
conducted UX (user experience) research. We qualitatively synthesized the
effects of polyadic CAs into four aspects of human-human interactions, i.e.,
communication, engagement, connection, and relationship maintenance. Through a
mixed-method analysis of the selected polyadic and dyadic CA studies, we
developed a suite of evaluation measurements on the effects. Our findings show
that designing with social boundaries, such as privacy, disclosure, and
identification, is crucial for ethical polyadic CAs. Future research should
also advance usability testing methods and trust-building guidelines for
conversational AI.
Related papers
- Multimodal Fusion with LLMs for Engagement Prediction in Natural Conversation [70.52558242336988]
We focus on predicting engagement in dyadic interactions by scrutinizing verbal and non-verbal cues, aiming to detect signs of disinterest or confusion.
In this work, we collect a dataset featuring 34 participants engaged in casual dyadic conversations, each providing self-reported engagement ratings at the end of each conversation.
We introduce a novel fusion strategy using Large Language Models (LLMs) to integrate multiple behavior modalities into a multimodal transcript''
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-13T18:28:12Z) - PersLLM: A Personified Training Approach for Large Language Models [66.16513246245401]
We propose PersLLM, integrating psychology-grounded principles of personality: social practice, consistency, and dynamic development.
We incorporate personality traits directly into the model parameters, enhancing the model's resistance to induction, promoting consistency, and supporting the dynamic evolution of personality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-17T08:13:22Z) - AntEval: Evaluation of Social Interaction Competencies in LLM-Driven
Agents [65.16893197330589]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated their ability to replicate human behaviors across a wide range of scenarios.
However, their capability in handling complex, multi-character social interactions has yet to be fully explored.
We introduce the Multi-Agent Interaction Evaluation Framework (AntEval), encompassing a novel interaction framework and evaluation methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-12T11:18:00Z) - Can AI Serve as a Substitute for Human Subjects in Software Engineering
Research? [24.39463126056733]
This vision paper proposes a novel approach to qualitative data collection in software engineering research by harnessing the capabilities of artificial intelligence (AI)
We explore the potential of AI-generated synthetic text as an alternative source of qualitative data.
We discuss the prospective development of new foundation models aimed at emulating human behavior in observational studies and user evaluations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-18T14:05:52Z) - Human-AI collaboration is not very collaborative yet: A taxonomy of interaction patterns in AI-assisted decision making from a systematic review [6.013543974938446]
Leveraging Artificial Intelligence in decision support systems has disproportionately focused on technological advancements.
A human-centered perspective attempts to alleviate this concern by designing AI solutions for seamless integration with existing processes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-30T17:46:38Z) - Human-AI Coevolution [48.74579595505374]
Coevolution AI is a process in which humans and AI algorithms continuously influence each other.
This paper introduces Coevolution AI as the cornerstone for a new field of study at the intersection between AI and complexity science.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-23T18:10:54Z) - Expanding the Role of Affective Phenomena in Multimodal Interaction
Research [57.069159905961214]
We examined over 16,000 papers from selected conferences in multimodal interaction, affective computing, and natural language processing.
We identify 910 affect-related papers and present our analysis of the role of affective phenomena in these papers.
We find limited research on how affect and emotion predictions might be used by AI systems to enhance machine understanding of human social behaviors and cognitive states.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-18T09:08:39Z) - Co-Located Human-Human Interaction Analysis using Nonverbal Cues: A
Survey [71.43956423427397]
We aim to identify the nonverbal cues and computational methodologies resulting in effective performance.
This survey differs from its counterparts by involving the widest spectrum of social phenomena and interaction settings.
Some major observations are: the most often used nonverbal cue, computational method, interaction environment, and sensing approach are speaking activity, support vector machines, and meetings composed of 3-4 persons equipped with microphones and cameras, respectively.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-20T13:37:57Z) - A Mental-Model Centric Landscape of Human-AI Symbiosis [31.14516396625931]
We introduce a significantly general version of human-aware AI interaction scheme, called generalized human-aware interaction (GHAI)
We will see how this new framework allows us to capture the various works done in the space of human-AI interaction and identify the fundamental behavioral patterns supported by these works.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-18T22:08:08Z) - eXtended Artificial Intelligence: New Prospects of Human-AI Interaction
Research [8.315174426992087]
The article provides a theoretical treatment and model of human-AI interaction based on an XR-AI continuum.
It shows why the combination of XR and AI fruitfully contributes to a valid and systematic investigation of human-AI interactions and interfaces.
The first experiment reveals an interesting gender effect in human-robot interaction, while the second experiment reveals an Eliza effect of a recommender system.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-27T22:12:06Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.