LobsDICE: Offline Imitation Learning from Observation via Stationary Distribution Correction Estimation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2202.13536v1
• Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 04:24:30 GMT
• Title: LobsDICE: Offline Imitation Learning from Observation via Stationary Distribution Correction Estimation
• Authors: Geon-Hyeong Kim, Jongmin Lee, Youngsoo Jang, Hongseok Yang, Kee-Eung Kim
• Abstract summary: We present LobsDICE, an offline IfO algorithm that learns to imitate the expert policy via optimization in the space of stationary distributions. Our algorithm solves a single convex minimization problem, which minimizes the divergence between the two state-transition distributions induced by the expert and the agent policy.
• Score: 37.31080581310114
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: We consider the problem of imitation from observation (IfO), in which the agent aims to mimic the expert's behavior from the state-only demonstrations by experts. We additionally assume that the agent cannot interact with the environment but has access to the action-labeled transition data collected by some agent with unknown quality. This offline setting for IfO is appealing in many real-world scenarios where the ground-truth expert actions are inaccessible and the arbitrary environment interactions are costly or risky. In this paper, we present LobsDICE, an offline IfO algorithm that learns to imitate the expert policy via optimization in the space of stationary distributions. Our algorithm solves a single convex minimization problem, which minimizes the divergence between the two state-transition distributions induced by the expert and the agent policy. On an extensive set of offline IfO tasks, LobsDICE shows promising results, outperforming strong baseline algorithms.

Related papers

• Multi-Agent Imitation Learning: Value is Easy, Regret is Hard [52.31989962031179]
  We study a multi-agent imitation learning (MAIL) problem where we take the perspective of a learner attempting to coordinate a group of agents. Most prior work in MAIL essentially reduces the problem to matching the behavior of the expert within the support of the demonstrations. While doing so is sufficient to drive the value gap between the learner and the expert to zero under the assumption that agents are non-strategic, it does not guarantee to deviations by strategic agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-06T16:18:20Z)
• AlberDICE: Addressing Out-Of-Distribution Joint Actions in Offline Multi-Agent RL via Alternating Stationary Distribution Correction Estimation [65.4532392602682]
  One of the main challenges in offline Reinforcement Learning (RL) is the distribution shift that arises from the learned policy deviating from the data collection policy. This is often addressed by avoiding out-of-distribution (OOD) actions during policy improvement as their presence can lead to substantial performance degradation. We introduce AlberDICE, an offline MARL algorithm that performs centralized training of individual agents based on stationary distribution optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-03T18:56:48Z)
• A Simple Solution for Offline Imitation from Observations and Examples with Possibly Incomplete Trajectories [122.11358440078581]
  offline imitation is useful in real-world scenarios where arbitrary interactions are costly and expert actions are unavailable. We propose Trajectory-Aware Learning from Observations (TAILO) to solve MDPs where only task-specific expert states and task-agnostic non-expert state-action pairs are available.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-02T15:41:09Z)
• Discriminator-Weighted Offline Imitation Learning from Suboptimal Demonstrations [5.760034336327491]
  We study the problem of offline Learning (IL) where an agent aims to learn an optimal expert behavior policy without additional online environment interactions. We introduce an additional discriminator to distinguish expert and non-expert data. Our proposed algorithm achieves higher returns and faster training speed compared to baseline algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-20T17:29:04Z)
• Byzantine-Robust Online and Offline Distributed Reinforcement Learning [60.970950468309056]
  We consider a distributed reinforcement learning setting where multiple agents explore the environment and communicate their experiences through a central server. $alpha$-fraction of agents are adversarial and can report arbitrary fake information. We seek to identify a near-optimal policy for the underlying Markov decision process in the presence of these adversarial agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-01T00:44:53Z)
• Dealing with the Unknown: Pessimistic Offline Reinforcement Learning [25.30634466168587]
  We propose a Pessimistic Offline Reinforcement Learning (PessORL) algorithm to actively lead the agent back to the area where it is familiar. We focus on problems caused by out-of-distribution (OOD) states, and deliberately penalize high values at states that are absent in the training dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-09T22:38:58Z)
• Believe What You See: Implicit Constraint Approach for Offline Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [16.707045765042505]
  Current offline RL algorithms are ineffective in multi-agent systems due to the accumulated extrapolation error. We propose a novel offline RL algorithm, named Implicit Constraint Q-learning (ICQ), which effectively alleviates the extrapolation error. Experimental results demonstrate that the extrapolation error is reduced to almost zero and insensitive to the number of agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T08:02:31Z)
• Strictly Batch Imitation Learning by Energy-based Distribution Matching [104.33286163090179]
  Consider learning a policy purely on the basis of demonstrated behavior -- that is, with no access to reinforcement signals, no knowledge of transition dynamics, and no further interaction with the environment. One solution is simply to retrofit existing algorithms for apprenticeship learning to work in the offline setting. But such an approach leans heavily on off-policy evaluation or offline model estimation, and can be indirect and inefficient. We argue that a good solution should be able to explicitly parameterize a policy, implicitly learn from rollout dynamics, and operate in an entirely offline fashion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-25T03:27:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.