Bots don't Vote, but They Surely Bother! A Study of Anomalous Accounts in a National Referendum

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2203.04135v1
• Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 15:02:51 GMT
• Title: Bots don't Vote, but They Surely Bother! A Study of Anomalous Accounts in a National Referendum
• Authors: Eduardo Graells-Garrido and Ricardo Baeza-Yates
• Abstract summary: We present a characterization of the discussion on Twitter about the 2020 Chilean constitutional referendum. The characterization uses a profile-oriented analysis that enables the isolation of anomalous content using machine learning. We measure how anomalous accounts (some of which are automated bots) produce content and interact promoting (false) information.
• Score: 1.5609988622100526
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The Web contains several social media platforms for discussion, exchange of ideas, and content publishing. These platforms are used by people, but also by distributed agents known as bots. Although bots have existed for decades, with many of them being benevolent, their influence in propagating and generating deceptive information in the last years has increased. Here we present a characterization of the discussion on Twitter about the 2020 Chilean constitutional referendum. The characterization uses a profile-oriented analysis that enables the isolation of anomalous content using machine learning. As result, we obtain a characterization that matches national vote turnout, and we measure how anomalous accounts (some of which are automated bots) produce content and interact promoting (false) information.

Related papers

• On the Use of Proxies in Political Ad Targeting [49.61009579554272]
  We show that major political advertisers circumvented mitigations by targeting proxy attributes. Our findings have crucial implications for the ongoing discussion on the regulation of political advertising.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T17:15:13Z)
• Entendre, a Social Bot Detection Tool for Niche, Fringe, and Extreme Social Media [1.4913052010438639]
  We introduce Entendre, an open-access, scalable, and platform-agnostic bot detection framework. We exploit the idea that most social platforms share a generic template, where users can post content, approve content, and provide a bio. To demonstrate Entendre's effectiveness, we used it to explore the presence of bots among accounts posting racist content on the now-defunct right-wing platform Parler.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-13T13:50:49Z)
• From Online Behaviours to Images: A Novel Approach to Social Bot Detection [0.3867363075280544]
  A particular type of social accounts is known to promote unreputable content, hyperpartisan, and propagandistic information. We propose a novel approach to bot detection: we first propose a new algorithm that transforms the sequence of actions that an account performs into an image. We compare our performances with state-of-the-art results for bot detection on genuine accounts / bot accounts datasets well known in the literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-15T11:36:50Z)
• Design and analysis of tweet-based election models for the 2021 Mexican legislative election [55.41644538483948]
  We use a dataset of 15 million election-related tweets in the six months preceding election day. We find that models using data with geographical attributes determine the results of the election with better precision and accuracy than conventional polling methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-02T12:40:05Z)
• Investigating the Validity of Botometer-based Social Bot Studies [0.0]
  Social bots are assumed to be automated social media accounts operated by malicious actors with the goal of manipulating public opinion. Social bot activity has been reported in many different political contexts, including the U.S. presidential elections. We point out a fundamental theoretical flaw in the widely-used study design for estimating the prevalence of social bots.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-23T09:31:30Z)
• Identification of Twitter Bots based on an Explainable ML Framework: the US 2020 Elections Case Study [72.61531092316092]
  This paper focuses on the design of a novel system for identifying Twitter bots based on labeled Twitter data. Supervised machine learning (ML) framework is adopted using an Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm. Our study also deploys Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) for explaining the ML model predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-08T14:12:24Z)
• BotNet Detection On Social Media [0.0]
  Social media has become an open playground for user (bot) accounts trying to manipulate other users using these platforms. There has been evidence of bots manipulating the election results which can be a great threat to the whole nation and hence the whole world. Our goal is to leverage semantic web mining techniques to identify fake bots or accounts involved in these activities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-12T00:38:51Z)
• News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
  We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
• Detection of Novel Social Bots by Ensembles of Specialized Classifiers [60.63582690037839]
  Malicious actors create inauthentic social media accounts controlled in part by algorithms, known as social bots, to disseminate misinformation and agitate online discussion. We show that different types of bots are characterized by different behavioral features. We propose a new supervised learning method that trains classifiers specialized for each class of bots and combines their decisions through the maximum rule.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-11T22:59:59Z)
• How Twitter Data Sampling Biases U.S. Voter Behavior Characterizations [6.364128212193265]
  Recent studies reveal the existence of inauthentic actors such as malicious social bots and trolls. In this paper, we aim to close this gap using Twitter data from the 2018 U.S. midterm elections. We show that hyperactive accounts are more likely to exhibit various suspicious behaviors and share low-credibility information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-02T08:33:30Z)
• Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
  We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms. We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features. We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.