Reply to Galilean invariance without superluminal particles

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2203.04141v1
• Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 15:12:25 GMT
• Title: Reply to Galilean invariance without superluminal particles
• Authors: Andrzej Dragan and Artur Ekert
• Abstract summary: In a recent comment [arXiv:2112.05658], Grudka and W'ojcik object to some of our earlier claims concerning a link between fundamental postulates of quantum theory and special relativity extended to superluminal frames of reference. In this short reply we refute these criticisms.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In a recent comment [arXiv:2112.05658], Grudka and W\'ojcik object to some of our earlier claims concerning a link between fundamental postulates of quantum theory and special relativity extended to superluminal frames of reference. In this short reply we refute these criticisms.

Related papers

• Linear response theory for cavity QED materials [41.94295877935867]
  We derive closed formulas for various responses of both the cavity and the matter. We discover novel excitations in quantum magnets, where the cavity binds magnon pairs into localized states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T18:00:01Z)
• Antiparticles in non-relativistic quantum mechanics [55.2480439325792]
  Non-relativistic quantum mechanics was originally formulated to describe particles. We show how the concept of antiparticles can and should be introduced in the non-relativistic case without appealing to quantum field theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-02T09:16:18Z)
• Relaxation of first-class constraints and the quantization of gauge theories: from "matter without matter" to the reappearance of time in quantum gravity [72.27323884094953]
  We make a conceptual overview of an approach to the initial-value problem in canonical gauge theories. We stress how the first-class phase-space constraints may be relaxed if we interpret them as fixing the values of new degrees of freedom.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T19:00:02Z)
• Reply to the comment on "Quantum principle of relativity" [0.0]
  We discuss critical remarks raised by Horodecki towards our work on the connection between superluminal extension of special relativity and fundamental aspects of quantum theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-31T08:14:12Z)
• Mirrorless lasing: a theoretical perspective [33.7054351451505]
  We review first-principles theory that describes degenerate lasing in a vapor of Rb atoms. We discuss the mechanisms of amplification of light generated in the medium with population inversion between magnetic sublevels within the $D$ line.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-15T18:09:53Z)
• A critical analysis of `Relative facts do not exist. Relational quantum mechanics is incompatible with quantum mechanics' by Jay Lawrence, Marcin Markiewicz and Marek \'{Z}ukowski [0.0]
  We discuss a recent work by J.Lawrence et al.[arxiv.org/abs/2208.11793] criticizing relational quantum mechanics (RQM) and based on a famous nonlocality theorem. Here, we show that the claims presented in this recent work are unjustified and we debunk the analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-02T18:52:17Z)
• Reply to the comment on "Quantum priniple of relativity" [0.0]
  We refute criticisms by Del Santo and Horvat towards our paper "Quantum principle of relativity" Most of their counterarguments can be dismissed, and the rest provides further evidence to our claims.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-30T12:52:07Z)
• A dialog on the fate of information in black hole evaporation [77.34726150561087]
  We present two alternative perspectives for the resolution of Hawking's information puzzle in black hole evaporation. One of them is the central role played by the existence of the interior singularity that we expect to be replaced by a more fundamental quantum gravity formulation. Both views rely on the notion that the standard effective quantum field theoretic perspective would require some deep modifications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-17T16:21:22Z)
• Comment on "Quantum principle of relativity" [0.0]
  A. Dragan and A. Ekert have recently claimed that fundamental properties of quantum physics can be derived solely from relativistic considerations. We show that their arguments are flawed and their claims therefore unwarranted.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-07T19:01:01Z)
• In defense of Relational Quantum Mechanics: A note on `Qubits are not observers' [0.0]
  This is a short note to answer Brukner's objection [see arXiv:2107.03513] to Rovelli's theory and concerning the preferred basis problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-05T19:17:14Z)
• Genuine multipartite entanglement and quantum coherence in an electron-positron system: Relativistic covariance [117.44028458220427]
  We analyze the behavior of both genuine multipartite entanglement and quantum coherence under Lorentz boosts. A given combination of these quantum resources is shown to form a Lorentz invariant.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-26T17:22:59Z)
• Quantum particle across Grushin singularity [77.34726150561087]
  We study the phenomenon of transmission across the singularity that separates the two half-cylinders. All the local realisations of the free (Laplace-Beltrami) quantum Hamiltonian are examined as non-equivalent protocols of transmission/reflection. This allows to comprehend the distinguished status of the so-called bridging' transmission protocol previously identified in the literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-27T12:53:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.