In defense of Relational Quantum Mechanics: A note on `Qubits are not observers'

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2202.02615v1
• Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2022 19:17:14 GMT
• Title: In defense of Relational Quantum Mechanics: A note on `Qubits are not observers'
• Authors: Aur\'elien Drezet
• Abstract summary: This is a short note to answer Brukner's objection [see arXiv:2107.03513] to Rovelli's theory and concerning the preferred basis problem.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This is a short note to answer Brukner's objection [see arXiv:2107.03513] to Rovelli's theory and concerning the preferred basis problem.

Related papers

• Antiparticles in non-relativistic quantum mechanics [55.2480439325792]
  Non-relativistic quantum mechanics was originally formulated to describe particles. We show how the concept of antiparticles can and should be introduced in the non-relativistic case without appealing to quantum field theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-02T09:16:18Z)
• Relaxation of first-class constraints and the quantization of gauge theories: from "matter without matter" to the reappearance of time in quantum gravity [72.27323884094953]
  We make a conceptual overview of an approach to the initial-value problem in canonical gauge theories. We stress how the first-class phase-space constraints may be relaxed if we interpret them as fixing the values of new degrees of freedom.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T19:00:02Z)
• Relational Quantum Mechanics is Still Incompatible with Quantum Mechanics [0.0]
  We show that a central concept in Quantum Mechanics, are inconsistent with Quantum Mechanics. Our work has been criticized by Cavalcanti, Di Biagio, Rovelli (CDR)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-27T09:34:17Z)
• Relative facts do not exist. Relational Quantum Mechanics is Incompatible with Quantum Mechanics. Response to the critique by Aur\'elien Drezet [0.0]
  We point out that our critical analysis of RQM was precisely based on the most recent formulation of RQM, and that the theses in the critique are based on neither RQM assumptions nor on our arguments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T14:13:56Z)
• A critical analysis of `Relative facts do not exist. Relational quantum mechanics is incompatible with quantum mechanics' by Jay Lawrence, Marcin Markiewicz and Marek \'{Z}ukowski [0.0]
  We discuss a recent work by J.Lawrence et al.[arxiv.org/abs/2208.11793] criticizing relational quantum mechanics (RQM) and based on a famous nonlocality theorem. Here, we show that the claims presented in this recent work are unjustified and we debunk the analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-02T18:52:17Z)
• Reply to Galilean invariance without superluminal particles [0.0]
  In a recent comment [arXiv:2112.05658], Grudka and W'ojcik object to some of our earlier claims concerning a link between fundamental postulates of quantum theory and special relativity extended to superluminal frames of reference. In this short reply we refute these criticisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-08T15:12:25Z)
• Relational Quantum Mechanics is about Facts, not States: A reply to Pienaar and Brukner [0.0]
  We answer objections to the relational interpretation of quantum mechanics raised by vCaslav Brukner and Jacques Pienaar. We show that, far from questioning the viability of the interpretation, they sharpen and clarify it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-07T16:37:09Z)
• Observers of quantum systems cannot agree to disagree [55.41644538483948]
  We ask whether agreement between observers can serve as a physical principle that must hold for any theory of the world. We construct examples of (postquantum) no-signaling boxes where observers can agree to disagree.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-17T19:00:04Z)
• Reply to "Comment on "Quantum Time Crystals from Hamiltonians with Long-Range Interactions"" [23.87373187143897]
  In this reply we answer one-by-one all questions raised in the discussion. As for the ideological dispute, it brightly highlights a bizarre nature of time crystalline order in closed quantum systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-13T13:51:01Z)
• Improved tripartite uncertainty relation with quantum memory [5.43508370077166]
  Uncertainty principle is a striking and fundamental feature in quantum mechanics. In quantum information theory, this uncertainty principle is popularly formulized in terms of entropy. We present an improvement of tripartite quantum-memory-assisted entropic uncertainty relation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-09T03:54:51Z)
• Quantum Mechanical description of Bell's experiment assumes Locality [91.3755431537592]
  Bell's experiment description assumes the (Quantum Mechanics-language equivalent of the classical) condition of Locality. This result is complementary to a recently published one demonstrating that non-Locality is necessary to describe said experiment. It is concluded that, within the framework of Quantum Mechanics, there is absolutely no reason to believe in the existence of non-Local effects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-27T15:04:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.