Structure and Distribution Metric for Quantifying the Quality of Uncertainty: Assessing Gaussian Processes, Deep Neural Nets, and Deep Neural Operators for Regression

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2203.04515v1
• Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 04:16:31 GMT
• Title: Structure and Distribution Metric for Quantifying the Quality of Uncertainty: Assessing Gaussian Processes, Deep Neural Nets, and Deep Neural Operators for Regression
• Authors: Ethan Pickering and Themistoklis P. Sapsis
• Abstract summary: We propose two comparison metrics that may be implemented to arbitrary dimensions in regression tasks. The structure metric assesses the similarity in shape and location of uncertainty with the true error, while the distribution metric quantifies the supported magnitudes between the two. We apply these metrics to Gaussian Processes (GPs), Ensemble Deep Neural Nets (DNNs), and Ensemble Deep Neural Operators (DNOs) on high-dimensional and nonlinear test cases.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We propose two bounded comparison metrics that may be implemented to arbitrary dimensions in regression tasks. One quantifies the structure of uncertainty and the other quantifies the distribution of uncertainty. The structure metric assesses the similarity in shape and location of uncertainty with the true error, while the distribution metric quantifies the supported magnitudes between the two. We apply these metrics to Gaussian Processes (GPs), Ensemble Deep Neural Nets (DNNs), and Ensemble Deep Neural Operators (DNOs) on high-dimensional and nonlinear test cases. We find that comparing a model's uncertainty estimates with the model's squared error provides a compelling ground truth assessment. We also observe that both DNNs and DNOs, especially when compared to GPs, provide encouraging metric values in high dimensions with either sparse or plentiful data.

Related papers

• Bias-Reduced Neural Networks for Parameter Estimation in Quantitative MRI [0.13654846342364307]
  We develop neural network (NN)-based quantitative MRI parameter estimators with minimal bias and a variance close to the Cram'er-Rao bound.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T20:41:48Z)
• Deep Neural Networks for Nonparametric Interaction Models with Diverging Dimension [6.939768185086753]
  We analyze a $kth$ order nonparametric interaction model in both growing dimension scenarios ($d$ grows with $n$ but at a slower rate) and in high dimension ($d gtrsim n$) We show that under certain standard assumptions, debiased deep neural networks achieve a minimax optimal rate both in terms of $(n, d)$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-12T04:19:39Z)
• Learning Discretized Neural Networks under Ricci Flow [51.36292559262042]
  We study Discretized Neural Networks (DNNs) composed of low-precision weights and activations. DNNs suffer from either infinite or zero gradients due to the non-differentiable discrete function during training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-07T10:51:53Z)
• Learning Low Dimensional State Spaces with Overparameterized Recurrent Neural Nets [57.06026574261203]
  We provide theoretical evidence for learning low-dimensional state spaces, which can also model long-term memory. Experiments corroborate our theory, demonstrating extrapolation via learning low-dimensional state spaces with both linear and non-linear RNNs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-25T14:45:15Z)
• A General Framework for quantifying Aleatoric and Epistemic uncertainty in Graph Neural Networks [0.29494468099506893]
  Graph Neural Networks (GNN) provide a powerful framework that elegantly integrates Graph theory with Machine learning. We consider the problem of quantifying the uncertainty in predictions of GNN stemming from modeling errors and measurement uncertainty. We propose a unified approach to treat both sources of uncertainty in a Bayesian framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-20T05:25:40Z)
• Dense Uncertainty Estimation [62.23555922631451]
  In this paper, we investigate neural networks and uncertainty estimation techniques to achieve both accurate deterministic prediction and reliable uncertainty estimation. We work on two types of uncertainty estimations solutions, namely ensemble based methods and generative model based methods, and explain their pros and cons while using them in fully/semi/weakly-supervised framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-13T01:23:48Z)
• Divergence Frontiers for Generative Models: Sample Complexity, Quantization Level, and Frontier Integral [58.434753643798224]
  Divergence frontiers have been proposed as an evaluation framework for generative models. We establish non-asymptotic bounds on the sample complexity of the plug-in estimator of divergence frontiers. We also augment the divergence frontier framework by investigating the statistical performance of smoothed distribution estimators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-15T06:26:25Z)
• Post-mortem on a deep learning contest: a Simpson's paradox and the complementary roles of scale metrics versus shape metrics [61.49826776409194]
  We analyze a corpus of models made publicly-available for a contest to predict the generalization accuracy of neural network (NN) models. We identify what amounts to a Simpson's paradox: where "scale" metrics perform well overall but perform poorly on sub partitions of the data. We present two novel shape metrics, one data-independent, and the other data-dependent, which can predict trends in the test accuracy of a series of NNs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-01T19:19:49Z)
• Probabilistic Neighbourhood Component Analysis: Sample Efficient Uncertainty Estimation in Deep Learning [25.8227937350516]
  We show that uncertainty estimation capability of state-of-the-art BNNs and Deep Ensemble models degrades significantly when the amount of training data is small. We propose a probabilistic generalization of the popular sample-efficient non-parametric kNN approach. Our approach enables deep kNN to accurately quantify underlying uncertainties in its prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-18T21:36:31Z)
• Unlabelled Data Improves Bayesian Uncertainty Calibration under Covariate Shift [100.52588638477862]
  We develop an approximate Bayesian inference scheme based on posterior regularisation. We demonstrate the utility of our method in the context of transferring prognostic models of prostate cancer across globally diverse populations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-26T13:50:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.