Towards Equal Opportunity Fairness through Adversarial Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2203.06317v1
• Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2022 02:22:58 GMT
• Title: Towards Equal Opportunity Fairness through Adversarial Learning
• Authors: Xudong Han, Timothy Baldwin, Trevor Cohn
• Abstract summary: Adversarial training is a common approach for bias mitigation in natural language processing. We propose an augmented discriminator for adversarial training, which takes the target class as input to create richer features.
• Score: 64.45845091719002
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Adversarial training is a common approach for bias mitigation in natural language processing. Although most work on debiasing is motivated by equal opportunity, it is not explicitly captured in standard adversarial training. In this paper, we propose an augmented discriminator for adversarial training, which takes the target class as input to create richer features and more explicitly model equal opportunity. Experimental results over two datasets show that our method substantially improves over standard adversarial debiasing methods, in terms of the performance--fairness trade-off.

Related papers

• Improving Robust Fairness via Balance Adversarial Training [51.67643171193376]
  Adversarial training (AT) methods are effective against adversarial attacks, yet they introduce severe disparity of accuracy and robustness between different classes. We propose Adversarial Training (BAT) to address the robust fairness problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-15T14:44:48Z)
• Fair Inference for Discrete Latent Variable Models [12.558187319452657]
  Machine learning models, trained on data without due care, often exhibit unfair and discriminatory behavior against certain populations. We develop a fair variational inference technique for the discrete latent variables, which is accomplished by including a fairness penalty on the variational distribution. To demonstrate the generality of our approach and its potential for real-world impact, we then develop a special-purpose graphical model for criminal justice risk assessments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-15T04:54:21Z)
• Optimising Equal Opportunity Fairness in Model Training [60.0947291284978]
  Existing debiasing methods, such as adversarial training and removing protected information from representations, have been shown to reduce bias. We propose two novel training objectives which directly optimise for the widely-used criterion of it equal opportunity, and show that they are effective in reducing bias while maintaining high performance over two classification tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-05T01:57:58Z)
• Contrastive Learning for Fair Representations [50.95604482330149]
  Trained classification models can unintentionally lead to biased representations and predictions. Existing debiasing methods for classification models, such as adversarial training, are often expensive to train and difficult to optimise. We propose a method for mitigating bias by incorporating contrastive learning, in which instances sharing the same class label are encouraged to have similar representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-22T10:47:51Z)
• Fairness-aware Class Imbalanced Learning [57.45784950421179]
  We evaluate long-tail learning methods for tweet sentiment and occupation classification. We extend a margin-loss based approach with methods to enforce fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-21T22:16:30Z)
• Diverse Adversaries for Mitigating Bias in Training [58.201275105195485]
  We propose a novel approach to adversarial learning based on the use of multiple diverse discriminators. Experimental results show that our method substantially improves over standard adversarial removal methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-25T10:35:13Z)
• Towards Accuracy-Fairness Paradox: Adversarial Example-based Data Augmentation for Visual Debiasing [15.689539491203373]
  Machine learning fairness concerns about the biases towards certain protected or sensitive group of people when addressing the target tasks. This paper studies the debiasing problem in the context of image classification tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-27T15:17:52Z)
• Recovering from Biased Data: Can Fairness Constraints Improve Accuracy? [11.435833538081557]
  Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) may produce a classifier that not only is biased but also has suboptimal accuracy on the true data distribution. We examine the ability of fairness-constrained ERM to correct this problem. We also consider other recovery methods including reweighting the training data, Equalized Odds, and Demographic Parity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-12-02T22:00:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.