Can Synthetic Translations Improve Bitext Quality?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2203.07643v1
• Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 04:36:29 GMT
• Title: Can Synthetic Translations Improve Bitext Quality?
• Authors: Eleftheria Briakou and Marine Carpuat
• Abstract summary: This work explores how synthetic translations can be used to revise potentially imperfect reference translations in mined bitext. We find that synthetic samples can improve bitext quality without any additional bilingual supervision when they replace the originals.
• Score: 28.910206570036593
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Synthetic translations have been used for a wide range of NLP tasks primarily as a means of data augmentation. This work explores, instead, how synthetic translations can be used to revise potentially imperfect reference translations in mined bitext. We find that synthetic samples can improve bitext quality without any additional bilingual supervision when they replace the originals based on a semantic equivalence classifier that helps mitigate NMT noise. The improved quality of the revised bitext is confirmed intrinsically via human evaluation and extrinsically through bilingual induction and MT tasks.

Related papers

• (Perhaps) Beyond Human Translation: Harnessing Multi-Agent Collaboration for Translating Ultra-Long Literary Texts [52.18246881218829]
  We introduce a novel multi-agent framework based on large language models (LLMs) for literary translation, implemented as a company called TransAgents. To evaluate the effectiveness of our system, we propose two innovative evaluation strategies: Monolingual Human Preference (MHP) and Bilingual LLM Preference (BLP)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-20T05:55:08Z)
• Do GPTs Produce Less Literal Translations? [20.095646048167612]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as general-purpose language models capable of addressing many natural language generation or understanding tasks. We find that translations out of English (E-X) from GPTs tend to be less literal, while exhibiting similar or better scores on Machine Translation quality metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-26T10:38:31Z)
• Discourse Centric Evaluation of Machine Translation with a Densely Annotated Parallel Corpus [82.07304301996562]
  This paper presents a new dataset with rich discourse annotations, built upon the large-scale parallel corpus BWB introduced in Jiang et al. We investigate the similarities and differences between the discourse structures of source and target languages. We discover that MT outputs differ fundamentally from human translations in terms of their latent discourse structures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-18T17:36:41Z)
• Lost in Translationese? Reducing Translation Effect Using Abstract Meaning Representation [11.358350306918027]
  We argue that Abstract Meaning Representation (AMR) can be used as an interlingua to reduce the amount of translationese in translated texts. By parsing English translations into an AMR and then generating text from that AMR, the result more closely resembles originally English text. This work makes strides towards reducing translationese in text and highlights the utility of AMR as an interlingua.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-23T00:04:14Z)
• Competency-Aware Neural Machine Translation: Can Machine Translation Know its Own Translation Quality? [61.866103154161884]
  Neural machine translation (NMT) is often criticized for failures that happen without awareness. We propose a novel competency-aware NMT by extending conventional NMT with a self-estimator. We show that the proposed method delivers outstanding performance on quality estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-25T02:39:41Z)
• Rethink about the Word-level Quality Estimation for Machine Translation from Human Judgement [57.72846454929923]
  We create a benchmark dataset, emphHJQE, where the expert translators directly annotate poorly translated words. We propose two tag correcting strategies, namely tag refinement strategy and tree-based annotation strategy, to make the TER-based artificial QE corpus closer to emphHJQE. The results show our proposed dataset is more consistent with human judgement and also confirm the effectiveness of the proposed tag correcting strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-13T02:37:12Z)
• Towards Debiasing Translation Artifacts [15.991970288297443]
  We propose a novel approach to reducing translationese by extending an established bias-removal technique. We use the Iterative Null-space Projection (INLP) algorithm, and show by measuring classification accuracy before and after debiasing, that translationese is reduced at both sentence and word level. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to debias translationese as represented in latent embedding space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-16T21:46:51Z)
• BitextEdit: Automatic Bitext Editing for Improved Low-Resource Machine Translation [53.55009917938002]
  We propose to refine the mined bitexts via automatic editing. Experiments demonstrate that our approach successfully improves the quality of CCMatrix mined bitext for 5 low-resource language-pairs and 10 translation directions by up to 8 BLEU points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-12T16:00:39Z)
• Exploiting Curriculum Learning in Unsupervised Neural Machine Translation [28.75229367700697]
  We propose a curriculum learning method to gradually utilize pseudo bi-texts based on their quality from multiple granularities. Experimental results on WMT 14 En-Fr, WMT 16 En-De, WMT 16 En-Ro, and LDC En-Zh translation tasks demonstrate that the proposed method achieves consistent improvements with faster convergence speed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-23T07:18:06Z)
• Alternated Training with Synthetic and Authentic Data for Neural Machine Translation [49.35605028467887]
  We propose alternated training with synthetic and authentic data for neural machine translation (NMT) Compared with previous work, we introduce authentic data as guidance to prevent the training of NMT models from being disturbed by noisy synthetic data. Experiments on Chinese-English and German-English translation tasks show that our approach improves the performance over several strong baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-16T07:13:16Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.