DeepTrust: A Reliable Financial Knowledge Retrieval Framework For Explaining Extreme Pricing Anomalies

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2203.08144v1
• Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 06:29:22 GMT
• Title: DeepTrust: A Reliable Financial Knowledge Retrieval Framework For Explaining Extreme Pricing Anomalies
• Authors: Pok Wah Chan
• Abstract summary: We introduce DeepTrust, a reliable financial knowledge retrieval framework on Twitter to explain extreme price moves at speed. Our proposed framework consists of three modules, specialized for anomaly detection, information retrieval and reliability assessment. The framework is evaluated on two self-annotated financial anomalies, i.e., Twitter and Facebook stock price on 29 and 30 April 2021.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Extreme pricing anomalies may occur unexpectedly without a trivial cause, and equity traders typically experience a meticulous process to source disparate information and analyze its reliability before integrating it into the trusted knowledge base. We introduce DeepTrust, a reliable financial knowledge retrieval framework on Twitter to explain extreme price moves at speed, while ensuring data veracity using state-of-the-art NLP techniques. Our proposed framework consists of three modules, specialized for anomaly detection, information retrieval and reliability assessment. The workflow starts with identifying anomalous asset price changes using machine learning models trained with historical pricing data, and retrieving correlated unstructured data from Twitter using enhanced queries with dynamic search conditions. DeepTrust extrapolates information reliability from tweet features, traces of generative language model, argumentation structure, subjectivity and sentiment signals, and refine a concise collection of credible tweets for market insights. The framework is evaluated on two self-annotated financial anomalies, i.e., Twitter and Facebook stock price on 29 and 30 April 2021. The optimal setup outperforms the baseline classifier by 7.75% and 15.77% on F0.5-scores, and 10.55% and 18.88% on precision, respectively, proving its capability in screening unreliable information precisely. At the same time, information retrieval and reliability assessment modules are analyzed individually on their effectiveness and causes of limitations, with identified subjective and objective factors that influence the performance. As a collaborative project with Refinitiv, this framework paves a promising path towards building a scalable commercial solution that assists traders to reach investment decisions on pricing anomalies with authenticated knowledge from social media platforms in real-time.

Related papers

• MisinfoEval: Generative AI in the Era of "Alternative Facts" [50.069577397751175]
  We introduce a framework for generating and evaluating large language model (LLM) based misinformation interventions. We present (1) an experiment with a simulated social media environment to measure effectiveness of misinformation interventions, and (2) a second experiment with personalized explanations tailored to the demographics and beliefs of users. Our findings confirm that LLM-based interventions are highly effective at correcting user behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-13T18:16:50Z)
• A Customer Level Fraudulent Activity Detection Benchmark for Enhancing Machine Learning Model Research and Evaluation [0.4681661603096334]
  This study introduces a benchmark that contains structured datasets specifically designed for customer-level fraud detection. The benchmark not only adheres to strict privacy guidelines to ensure user confidentiality but also provides a rich source of information by encapsulating customer-centric features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-23T04:57:44Z)
• Reliability Estimation of News Media Sources: Birds of a Feather Flock Together [0.7249731529275342]
  We introduce a novel approach for source reliability estimation that leverages reinforcement learning strategies. We validated our method on a news media reliability dataset that is an order of magnitude larger than comparable existing datasets. We release our implementation and dataset, aiming to provide a valuable resource for the NLP community working on information verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-15T08:27:47Z)
• On the Potential of Network-Based Features for Fraud Detection [3.0846824529023382]
  This article explores using the personalised PageRank (PPR) algorithm to capture the social dynamics of fraud. The primary objective is to compare the performance of traditional features with the addition of PPR in fraud detection models. Results indicate that integrating PPR enhances the model's predictive power, surpassing the baseline model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-14T13:20:09Z)
• Privacy-Preserving Financial Anomaly Detection via Federated Learning & Multi-Party Computation [17.314619091307343]
  We describe a privacy-preserving framework that allows financial institutions to jointly train highly accurate anomaly detection models. We show that our solution enables the network to train a highly accurate anomaly detection model while preserving privacy of customer data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-06T19:16:41Z)
• Preserving Knowledge Invariance: Rethinking Robustness Evaluation of Open Information Extraction [49.15931834209624]
  We present the first benchmark that simulates the evaluation of open information extraction models in the real world. We design and annotate a large-scale testbed in which each example is a knowledge-invariant clique. By further elaborating the robustness metric, a model is judged to be robust if its performance is consistently accurate on the overall cliques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T12:05:09Z)
• Auditing and Generating Synthetic Data with Controllable Trust Trade-offs [54.262044436203965]
  We introduce a holistic auditing framework that comprehensively evaluates synthetic datasets and AI models. It focuses on preventing bias and discrimination, ensures fidelity to the source data, assesses utility, robustness, and privacy preservation. We demonstrate the framework's effectiveness by auditing various generative models across diverse use cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-21T09:03:18Z)
• KGTrust: Evaluating Trustworthiness of SIoT via Knowledge Enhanced Graph Neural Networks [63.531790269009704]
  Social Internet of Things (SIoT) is a promising and emerging paradigm that injects the notion of social networking into smart objects (i.e., things) Due to the risks and uncertainty, a crucial and urgent problem to be settled is establishing reliable relationships within SIoT, that is, trust evaluation. We propose a novel knowledge-enhanced graph neural network (KGTrust) for better trust evaluation in SIoT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-22T14:24:45Z)
• Exploring the Trade-off between Plausibility, Change Intensity and Adversarial Power in Counterfactual Explanations using Multi-objective Optimization [73.89239820192894]
  We argue that automated counterfactual generation should regard several aspects of the produced adversarial instances. We present a novel framework for the generation of counterfactual examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-20T15:02:53Z)
• Personalized multi-faceted trust modeling to determine trust links in social media and its potential for misinformation management [61.88858330222619]
  We present an approach for predicting trust links between peers in social media. We propose a data-driven multi-faceted trust modeling which incorporates many distinct features for a comprehensive analysis. Illustrated in a trust-aware item recommendation task, we evaluate the proposed framework in the context of a large Yelp dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-11T19:40:51Z)
• A Sentiment Analysis Dataset for Trustworthiness Evaluation [22.734197353027632]
  Deep learning models are often criticized to be untrustworthy due to the black-box problem. We release a novel and well-annotated sentiment analysis dataset to evaluate robustness and interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-30T11:58:16Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.