Reducing Flipping Errors in Deep Neural Networks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2203.08390v1
• Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 04:38:06 GMT
• Title: Reducing Flipping Errors in Deep Neural Networks
• Authors: Xiang Deng, Yun Xiao, Bo Long, Zhongfei Zhang
• Abstract summary: Deep neural networks (DNNs) have been widely applied in various domains in artificial intelligence. In this paper, we study how many test (unseen) samples that a DNN misclassifies in the last epoch were ever correctly classified. We propose to restrict the behavior changes of a DNN on the correctly-classified samples so that the correct local boundaries can be maintained.
• Score: 39.24451665215755
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Deep neural networks (DNNs) have been widely applied in various domains in artificial intelligence including computer vision and natural language processing. A DNN is typically trained for many epochs and then a validation dataset is used to select the DNN in an epoch (we simply call this epoch "the last epoch") as the final model for making predictions on unseen samples, while it usually cannot achieve a perfect accuracy on unseen samples. An interesting question is "how many test (unseen) samples that a DNN misclassifies in the last epoch were ever correctly classified by the DNN before the last epoch?". In this paper, we empirically study this question and find on several benchmark datasets that the vast majority of the misclassified samples in the last epoch were ever classified correctly before the last epoch, which means that the predictions for these samples were flipped from "correct" to "wrong". Motivated by this observation, we propose to restrict the behavior changes of a DNN on the correctly-classified samples so that the correct local boundaries can be maintained and the flipping error on unseen samples can be largely reduced. Extensive experiments on different benchmark datasets with different modern network architectures demonstrate that the proposed flipping error reduction (FER) approach can substantially improve the generalization, the robustness, and the transferability of DNNs without introducing any additional network parameters or inference cost, only with a negligible training overhead.

Related papers

• DOTA: Distributional Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Models [52.98590762456236]
  Training-free test-time dynamic adapter (TDA) is a promising approach to address this issue. We propose a simple yet effective method for DistributiOnal Test-time Adaptation (Dota) Dota continually estimates the distributions of test samples, allowing the model to continually adapt to the deployment environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-28T15:03:28Z)
• Evaluating the Robustness of Deep-Learning Algorithm-Selection Models by Evolving Adversarial Instances [0.16874375111244325]
  Deep convolutional networks (DNN) are increasingly being used to perform algorithm-selection in neural domains. adversarial samples are successfully generated from up to 56% of the original instances depending on the dataset. We use an evolutionary algorithm (EA) to find perturbations of instances from two existing benchmarks for online bin packing that cause trained DRNs to misclassify.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T12:48:44Z)
• Favour: FAst Variance Operator for Uncertainty Rating [0.034530027457862]
  Bayesian Neural Networks (BNN) have emerged as a crucial approach for interpreting ML predictions. By sampling from the posterior distribution, data scientists may estimate the uncertainty of an inference. Previous work proposed propagating the first and second moments of the posterior directly through the network. This method is even slower than sampling, so the propagated variance needs to be approximated. Our contribution is a more principled variance propagation framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-21T22:53:20Z)
• Deep Neural Networks Tend To Extrapolate Predictably [51.303814412294514]
  neural network predictions tend to be unpredictable and overconfident when faced with out-of-distribution (OOD) inputs. We observe that neural network predictions often tend towards a constant value as input data becomes increasingly OOD. We show how one can leverage our insights in practice to enable risk-sensitive decision-making in the presence of OOD inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T03:25:32Z)
• Bridging Precision and Confidence: A Train-Time Loss for Calibrating Object Detection [58.789823426981044]
  We propose a novel auxiliary loss formulation that aims to align the class confidence of bounding boxes with the accurateness of predictions. Our results reveal that our train-time loss surpasses strong calibration baselines in reducing calibration error for both in and out-domain scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-25T08:56:21Z)
• Optimization Variance: Exploring Generalization Properties of DNNs [83.78477167211315]
  The test error of a deep neural network (DNN) often demonstrates double descent. We propose a novel metric, optimization variance (OV), to measure the diversity of model updates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-03T09:34:17Z)
• Self-Competitive Neural Networks [0.0]
  Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have improved the accuracy of classification problems in lots of applications. One of the challenges in training a DNN is its need to be fed by an enriched dataset to increase its accuracy and avoid it suffering from overfitting. Recently, researchers have worked extensively to propose methods for data augmentation. In this paper, we generate adversarial samples to refine the Domains of Attraction (DoAs) of each class. In this approach, at each stage, we use the model learned by the primary and generated adversarial data (up to that stage) to manipulate the primary data in a way that look complicated to
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-22T12:28:35Z)
• One Versus all for deep Neural Network Incertitude (OVNNI) quantification [12.734278426543332]
  We propose a new technique to quantify the epistemic uncertainty of data easily. This method consists in mixing the predictions of an ensemble of DNNs trained to classify One class vs All the other classes (OVA) with predictions from a standard DNN trained to perform All vs All (AVA) classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-01T14:06:12Z)
• Computing the Testing Error without a Testing Set [33.068870286618655]
  We derive an algorithm to estimate the performance gap between training and testing that does not require any testing dataset. This allows us to compute the DNN's testing error on unseen samples, even when we do not have access to them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-01T15:35:50Z)
• GraN: An Efficient Gradient-Norm Based Detector for Adversarial and Misclassified Examples [77.99182201815763]
  Deep neural networks (DNNs) are vulnerable to adversarial examples and other data perturbations. GraN is a time- and parameter-efficient method that is easily adaptable to any DNN. GraN achieves state-of-the-art performance on numerous problem set-ups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-20T10:09:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.