Who Shares Fake News? Uncovering Insights from Social Media Users' Post Histories

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2203.10560v3
• Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 16:46:59 GMT
• Title: Who Shares Fake News? Uncovering Insights from Social Media Users' Post Histories
• Authors: Verena Schoenmueller, Simon J. Blanchard, Gita V. Johar,
• Abstract summary: We propose that social-media users' own post histories are an underused resource for studying fake-news sharing. We identify cues that distinguish fake-news sharers, predict those most likely to share fake news, and identify promising constructs to build interventions.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We propose that social-media users' own post histories are an underused yet valuable resource for studying fake-news sharing. By extracting textual cues from their prior posts, and contrasting their prevalence against random social-media users and others (e.g., those with similar socio-demographics, political news-sharers, and fact-check sharers), researchers can identify cues that distinguish fake-news sharers, predict those most likely to share fake news, and identify promising constructs to build interventions. Our research includes studies along these lines. In Study 1, we explore the distinctive language patterns of fake-news sharers, highlighting elements such as their higher use of anger and power-related words. In Study 2, we show that adding textual cues into predictive models enhances their accuracy in predicting fake-news sharers. In Study 3, we explore the contrasting role of trait and situational anger, and show trait anger is associated with a greater propensity to share both true and fake news. In Study 4, we introduce a way to authenticate Twitter accounts in surveys, before using it to explore how crafting an ad copy that resonates with users' sense of power encourages the adoption of fact-checking tools. We hope to encourage the use of novel research methods for marketers and misinformation researchers.

Related papers

• Adapting Fake News Detection to the Era of Large Language Models [48.5847914481222]
  We study the interplay between machine-(paraphrased) real news, machine-generated fake news, human-written fake news, and human-written real news. Our experiments reveal an interesting pattern that detectors trained exclusively on human-written articles can indeed perform well at detecting machine-generated fake news, but not vice versa.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-02T08:39:45Z)
• Multiverse: Multilingual Evidence for Fake News Detection [71.51905606492376]
  Multiverse is a new feature based on multilingual evidence that can be used for fake news detection. The hypothesis of the usage of cross-lingual evidence as a feature for fake news detection is confirmed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-25T18:24:17Z)
• Faking Fake News for Real Fake News Detection: Propaganda-loaded Training Data Generation [105.20743048379387]
  We propose a novel framework for generating training examples informed by the known styles and strategies of human-authored propaganda. Specifically, we perform self-critical sequence training guided by natural language inference to ensure the validity of the generated articles. Our experimental results show that fake news detectors trained on PropaNews are better at detecting human-written disinformation by 3.62 - 7.69% F1 score on two public datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-10T14:24:19Z)
• FakeNewsLab: Experimental Study on Biases and Pitfalls Preventing us from Distinguishing True from False News [0.2741266294612776]
  This work highlights a series of pitfalls that can influence human annotators when building false news datasets. It also challenges the common rationale of AI that suggest users to read the full article before re-sharing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-22T12:02:16Z)
• A Study of Fake News Reading and Annotating in Social Media Context [1.0499611180329804]
  We present an eye-tracking study, in which we let 44 lay participants to casually read through a social media feed containing posts with news articles, some of which were fake. In a second run, we asked the participants to decide on the truthfulness of these articles. We also describe a follow-up qualitative study with a similar scenario but this time with 7 expert fake news annotators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-26T08:11:17Z)
• Profiling Fake News Spreaders on Social Media through Psychological and Motivational Factors [26.942545715296983]
  We study the characteristics and motivational factors of fake news spreaders on social media. We then perform a series of experiments to determine if fake news spreaders can be found to exhibit different characteristics than other users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-24T20:27:38Z)
• Stance Detection with BERT Embeddings for Credibility Analysis of Information on Social Media [1.7616042687330642]
  We propose a model for detecting fake news using stance as one of the features along with the content of the article. Our work interprets the content with automatic feature extraction and the relevance of the text pieces. The experiment conducted on the real-world dataset indicates that our model outperforms the previous work and enables fake news detection with an accuracy of 95.32%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-21T10:46:43Z)
• User Preference-aware Fake News Detection [61.86175081368782]
  Existing fake news detection algorithms focus on mining news content for deceptive signals. We propose a new framework, UPFD, which simultaneously captures various signals from user preferences by joint content and graph modeling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-25T21:19:24Z)
• Causal Understanding of Fake News Dissemination on Social Media [50.4854427067898]
  We argue that it is critical to understand what user attributes potentially cause users to share fake news. In fake news dissemination, confounders can be characterized by fake news sharing behavior that inherently relates to user attributes and online activities. We propose a principled approach to alleviating selection bias in fake news dissemination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-20T19:37:04Z)
• Machine Learning Explanations to Prevent Overtrust in Fake News Detection [64.46876057393703]
  This research investigates the effects of an Explainable AI assistant embedded in news review platforms for combating the propagation of fake news. We design a news reviewing and sharing interface, create a dataset of news stories, and train four interpretable fake news detection algorithms. For a deeper understanding of Explainable AI systems, we discuss interactions between user engagement, mental model, trust, and performance measures in the process of explaining.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-24T05:42:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.