Measuring the Impact of Taxes and Public Services on Property Values: A Double Machine Learning Approach

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2203.14751v1
• Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 19:33:54 GMT
• Title: Measuring the Impact of Taxes and Public Services on Property Values: A Double Machine Learning Approach
• Abstract summary: We use a novel dataset of 947 time-experimental local characteristic and public service controls for all municipalities in Sweden. We find that properly controlling for local public service and characteristic controls more than doubles the estimated impact of local income taxes on house prices. We also measure the impact of public services, education, and crime on house prices and the effect of local taxes on migration.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: How do property prices respond to changes in local taxes and local public services? Attempts to measure this, starting with Oates (1969), have suffered from a lack of local public service controls. Recent work attempts to overcome such data limitations through the use of quasi-experimental methods. We revisit this fundamental problem, but adopt a different empirical strategy that pairs the double machine learning estimator of Chernozhukov et al. (2018) with a novel dataset of 947 time-varying local characteristic and public service controls for all municipalities in Sweden over the 2010-2016 period. We find that properly controlling for local public service and characteristic controls more than doubles the estimated impact of local income taxes on house prices. We also exploit the unique features of our dataset to demonstrate that tax capitalization is stronger in areas with greater municipal competition, providing support for a core implication of the Tiebout hypothesis. Finally, we measure the impact of public services, education, and crime on house prices and the effect of local taxes on migration.

Related papers

• Tradeoffs are Domain Dependent: Improving Accuracy and Fairness in Property Tax Assessments [7.885461849343874]
  Algorithmic fairness research often assumes a tradeoff between fairness and accuracy. Yet this tradeoff may not be universal.<n>We test this assumption in the context of U.S. property tax assessment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-14T16:20:32Z)
• Failing on Bias Mitigation: Investigating Why Predictive Models Struggle with Government Data [3.2794063354054965]
  The potential for bias and unfairness in AI-supporting government services raises ethical and legal concerns.<n>Using crime rate prediction with the Bristol City Council data as a case study, we examine how these issues persist.<n>Our findings reveal that bias mitigation approaches applied to government data are not always effective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-21T13:29:43Z)
• Position: The Hidden Costs and Measurement Gaps of Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards [110.47944672736723]
  We argue that gains are often overstated due to three forces - an RLVR tax, evaluation pitfalls, and data contamination.<n>We propose a tax-aware training and evaluation protocol that co-optimizes accuracy, grounding, and calibrated abstention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T05:06:25Z)
• What does the public want their local government to hear? A data-driven case study of public comments across the state of Michigan [4.695090078528572]
  We propose a framework that characterizes comments along two dimensions: the local concerns where concerns are situated and the societal concerns raised.<n>Based on a large record of public comments we collect from 15 cities in Michigan.<n>We then demonstrate how our framework allows us to examine the salient local concerns and societal concerns that arise in our data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-24T14:10:04Z)
• MONOPOLY: Learning to Price Public Facilities for Revaluing Private Properties with Large-Scale Urban Data [38.17786634696134]
  We propose a distributed approach for revaluing private properties by learning to price public facilities. We have conducted extensive experiments with the large-scale urban data of several metropolises in China. Results show that our approach outperforms several mainstream methods with significant margins.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-27T06:44:41Z)
• Differentially Private Data Release on Graphs: Inefficiencies and Unfairness [48.96399034594329]
  This paper characterizes the impact of Differential Privacy on bias and unfairness in the context of releasing information about networks. We consider a network release problem where the network structure is known to all, but the weights on edges must be released privately. Our work provides theoretical foundations and empirical evidence into the bias and unfairness arising due to privacy in these networked decision problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T08:37:37Z)
• Quantifying Privacy Risks of Public Statistics to Residents of Subsidized Housing [28.493827954922885]
  We show that respondents in subsidized housing may deliberately not mention unauthorized children and other household members for fear of being evicted. By combining public statistics from the Decennial Census and the Department of Housing and Urban Development, we demonstrate a simple, inexpensive reconstruction attack. Our results provide a valuable example for policymakers seeking a trustworthy, accurate census.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-05T18:00:02Z)
• A Taxation Perspective for Fair Re-ranking [61.946428892727795]
  We introduce a new fair re-ranking method named Tax-rank, which levies taxes based on the difference in utility between two items. Our model Tax-rank offers a superior tax policy for fair re-ranking, theoretically demonstrating both continuity and controllability over accuracy loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-27T08:21:29Z)
• Unveiling and Mitigating Bias in Ride-Hailing Pricing for Equitable Policy Making [7.109149014725844]
  This paper presents the first thorough study on fair pricing for ride-hailing services by devising applicable fairness measures and corresponding fair pricing mechanisms. By providing discounts that may be subsidized by the government, our approach results in an increased number and more affordable rides for the disadvantaged community.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-09T16:22:47Z)
• Estimating Geographic Spillover Effects of COVID-19 Policies From Large-Scale Mobility Networks [54.90772000796717]
  County-level policies provide flexibility between regions, but may become less effective in the presence of geographic spillovers. We estimate spillovers using a mobility network with billions of timestamped edges. We find that county-level restrictions are only 54% as effective as statewide restrictions at reducing mobility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-12T20:16:54Z)
• Algorithmic Fairness and Vertical Equity: Income Fairness with IRS Tax Audit Models [73.24381010980606]
  This study examines issues of algorithmic fairness in the context of systems that inform tax audit selection by the IRS. We show how the use of more flexible machine learning methods for selecting audits may affect vertical equity. Our results have implications for the design of algorithmic tools across the public sector.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-20T16:27:06Z)
• Integrating Reward Maximization and Population Estimation: Sequential Decision-Making for Internal Revenue Service Audit Selection [2.2182596728059116]
  We introduce a new setting, optimize-and-estimate structured bandits. This setting is inherent to many public and private sector applications. We demonstrate its importance on real data from the United States Internal Revenue Service.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-25T18:28:55Z)
• Characterization of the Firm-Firm Public Procurement Co-Bidding Network from the State of Cear\'a (Brazil) Municipalities [58.720142291102135]
  We study the co-biding relationships between firms that participate in public tenders issued by the $184$ municipalities of the State of Cear'a (Brazil) between 2015 and 2019. We identify $22$ groups/communities of firms with similar patterns of procurement activity, defined by their geographic and activity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-17T13:58:30Z)
• The fiscal response to revenue shocks [0.12891210250935145]
  We study the very volatile revenues from the immovable property gains tax in the canton of Zurich, Switzerland. We apply machine learning strategies and implement the post-double-selection LASSO estimator to identify the causal effect of revenue shocks on public finances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-19T14:51:28Z)
• Detecting Transaction-based Tax Evasion Activities on Social Media Platforms Using Multi-modal Deep Neural Networks [0.0]
  This paper presents a machine learning based Regtech tool for international tax authorities to detect transaction-based tax evasion activities on social media platforms. The proposed model combines comments, hashtags and image modalities to produce the final output.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-27T13:05:39Z)
• The AI Economist: Improving Equality and Productivity with AI-Driven Tax Policies [119.07163415116686]
  We train social planners that discover tax policies that can effectively trade-off economic equality and productivity. We present an economic simulation environment that features competitive pressures and market dynamics. We show that AI-driven tax policies improve the trade-off between equality and productivity by 16% over baseline policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-28T06:57:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.