Taking models seriously and being a linguistic realist
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2204.03774v1
- Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 23:19:34 GMT
- Title: Taking models seriously and being a linguistic realist
- Authors: Raoni Wohnrath Arroyo and Gilson Olegario da Silva
- Abstract summary: We place Carnap as a proponent of a scientific realist stance, by presenting what he called "linguistic realism"
Some possible criticisms are considered, and a case study is offered with wave function realism, a popular position in the philosophy of quantum mechanics.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Carnap's conception of linguistic frameworks is widespread; however, it is
not entirely clear nor consensual to pinpoint what is the influence in his
stance within the traditional realist/anti-realist debate. In this paper, we
place Carnap as a proponent of a scientific realist stance, by presenting what
he called "linguistic realism". Some possible criticisms are considered, and a
case study is offered with wave function realism, a popular position in the
philosophy of quantum mechanics.
Related papers
- Transferable Belief Model on Quantum Circuits [18.733294090807995]
The transferable belief model is a semantic interpretation of Dempster-Shafer theory.
This paper introduces a new perspective on basic information representation for quantum AI models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-11T16:17:20Z) - How Entangled is Factuality and Deception in German? [10.790059579736276]
Research on deception detection and fact checking often conflates factual accuracy with the truthfulness of statements.
The belief-based deception framework disentangles these properties by defining texts as deceptive when there is a mismatch between what people say and what they truly believe.
We test the effectiveness of computational models in detecting deception using an established corpus of belief-based argumentation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-30T10:23:13Z) - Epistemology of Language Models: Do Language Models Have Holistic Knowledge? [30.02796959216552]
This paper investigates the inherent knowledge in language models from the perspective of holism.
The purpose of this paper is to explore whether characteristics of language models exhibit consistent with holism.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-19T16:06:10Z) - Bohr's Anti-Realist Realism in Contemporary (Quantum) Physics and
Philosophy [0.0]
We discuss the influential role of Niels Bohr's work in the anti-realist realist re-foundation of physics.
We will focus in how, still today, anti-realist realism continues to rule the contemporary post-modern research in both (quantum) physics and philosophy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-24T14:09:20Z) - Whence deep realism for Everettian quantum mechanics? [0.0]
Shallow' and deep' versions of scientific realism may be distinguished as follows: the shallow realist is satisfied with belief in the existence of the posits of our best scientific theories.
By contrast, deep realists claim that realism can be legitimate only if such entities are described in metaphysical terms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-30T00:58:04Z) - Realistic From Far But Far From Realism: Withering Scientific Realism in
the Quantum Case [0.0]
We argue that realism was never really at stake in the debate over scientific theory.
We argue that scientific realists believe that empirically adequate theories can be supplemented by interpretations that can mirror reality-as-it-is.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-12T15:20:57Z) - A Machine Learning Paradigm for Studying Pictorial Realism: Are
Constable's Clouds More Real than His Contemporaries? [12.704176167326525]
We propose a new machine-learning-based paradigm for studying pictorial realism in an explainable way.
Our framework assesses realism by measuring the similarity between clouds painted by artists noted for their skies, like Constable, and photographs of clouds.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-18T18:36:01Z) - Causal Inference Principles for Reasoning about Commonsense Causality [93.19149325083968]
Commonsense causality reasoning aims at identifying plausible causes and effects in natural language descriptions that are deemed reasonable by an average person.
Existing work usually relies on deep language models wholeheartedly, and is potentially susceptible to confounding co-occurrences.
Motivated by classical causal principles, we articulate the central question of CCR and draw parallels between human subjects in observational studies and natural languages.
We propose a novel framework, ROCK, to Reason O(A)bout Commonsense K(C)ausality, which utilizes temporal signals as incidental supervision.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-31T06:12:39Z) - Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory.
We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z) - The operational framework for quantum theories is both epistemologically
and ontologically neutral [0.0]
It is argued that there is no argument that could favour realist or antirealist attitudes towards quantum mechanics based solely on some features of some formalism.
Both realist and antirealist views are well accomodable within operational formulations of the theory.
This discussion aims at clarifying the limits of the historical and methodological affinities between scientific antirealism and operational physics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-06T09:22:43Z) - Mythical Thought in Bohr's Anti-Realist Realism (Or: Lessons on How to
Capture and Defeat Smoky Dragons) [0.0]
Bohrian approach to quantum mechanics is essentially grounded on an inconsistent form of anti-realist realism.
We will discuss the role of smoky dragons within both contemporary physics and philosophy of physics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-01T15:53:48Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.