Human's Role in-the-Loop
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2204.14192v1
- Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 13:11:54 GMT
- Title: Human's Role in-the-Loop
- Authors: Avigdor Gal, Roee Shraga
- Abstract summary: This blog discusses the respective roles of humans and machines in achieving cognitive tasks in matching.
It aims to determine whether traditional roles of humans and machines are subject to change.
Two possible modes of change, namely humans out and humans in, will be discussed.
- Score: 15.759742984491412
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Data integration has been recently challenged by the need to handle large
volumes of data, arriving at high velocity from a variety of sources, which
demonstrate varying levels of veracity. This challenging setting, often
referred to as big data, renders many of the existing techniques, especially
those that are human-intensive, obsolete. Big data also produces technological
advancements such as Internet of things, cloud computing, and deep learning,
and accordingly, provides a new, exciting, and challenging research agenda.
Given the availability of data and the improvement of machine learning
techniques, this blog discusses the respective roles of humans and machines in
achieving cognitive tasks in matching, aiming to determine whether traditional
roles of humans and machines are subject to change. Such investigation, we
believe, will pave a way to better utilize both human and machine resources in
new and innovative manners. We shall discuss two possible modes of change,
namely humans out and humans in. Humans out aim at exploring out-of-the-box
latent matching reasoning using machine learning algorithms when attempting to
overpower human matcher performance. Pursuing out-of-the-box thinking, machine
and deep learning can be involved in matching. Humans in explores how to better
involve humans in the matching loop by assigning human matchers with a
symmetric role to algorithmic matcher in the matching process.
Related papers
- HumanoidBench: Simulated Humanoid Benchmark for Whole-Body Locomotion and Manipulation [50.616995671367704]
We present a high-dimensional, simulated robot learning benchmark, HumanoidBench, featuring a humanoid robot equipped with dexterous hands.
Our findings reveal that state-of-the-art reinforcement learning algorithms struggle with most tasks, whereas a hierarchical learning approach achieves superior performance when supported by robust low-level policies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-15T17:45:44Z) - Can AI Serve as a Substitute for Human Subjects in Software Engineering
Research? [24.39463126056733]
This vision paper proposes a novel approach to qualitative data collection in software engineering research by harnessing the capabilities of artificial intelligence (AI)
We explore the potential of AI-generated synthetic text as an alternative source of qualitative data.
We discuss the prospective development of new foundation models aimed at emulating human behavior in observational studies and user evaluations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-18T14:05:52Z) - Human in the AI loop via xAI and Active Learning for Visual Inspection [2.261815118231329]
Industrial revolutions have disrupted manufacturing by introducing automation into production.
Advances in robotics and artificial intelligence open new frontiers of human-machine collaboration.
The present work first describes Industry 5.0, human-machine collaboration, and state-of-the-art regarding quality inspection.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-03T17:23:23Z) - Human Decision Makings on Curriculum Reinforcement Learning with
Difficulty Adjustment [52.07473934146584]
We guide the curriculum reinforcement learning results towards a preferred performance level that is neither too hard nor too easy via learning from the human decision process.
Our system is highly parallelizable, making it possible for a human to train large-scale reinforcement learning applications.
It shows reinforcement learning performance can successfully adjust in sync with the human desired difficulty level.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-04T23:53:51Z) - What Matters in Learning from Offline Human Demonstrations for Robot
Manipulation [64.43440450794495]
We conduct an extensive study of six offline learning algorithms for robot manipulation.
Our study analyzes the most critical challenges when learning from offline human data.
We highlight opportunities for learning from human datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-06T20:48:30Z) - Ten Quick Tips for Deep Learning in Biology [116.78436313026478]
Machine learning is concerned with the development and applications of algorithms that can recognize patterns in data and use them for predictive modeling.
Deep learning has become its own subfield of machine learning.
In the context of biological research, deep learning has been increasingly used to derive novel insights from high-dimensional biological data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-29T21:02:44Z) - Human Trajectory Forecasting in Crowds: A Deep Learning Perspective [89.4600982169]
We present an in-depth analysis of existing deep learning-based methods for modelling social interactions.
We propose two knowledge-based data-driven methods to effectively capture these social interactions.
We develop a large scale interaction-centric benchmark TrajNet++, a significant yet missing component in the field of human trajectory forecasting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-07T17:19:56Z) - Learning to Complement Humans [67.38348247794949]
A rising vision for AI in the open world centers on the development of systems that can complement humans for perceptual, diagnostic, and reasoning tasks.
We demonstrate how an end-to-end learning strategy can be harnessed to optimize the combined performance of human-machine teams.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-01T20:00:23Z) - Human-robot co-manipulation of extended objects: Data-driven models and
control from analysis of human-human dyads [2.7036498789349244]
We use data from human-human dyad experiments to determine motion intent which we use for a physical human-robot co-manipulation task.
We develop a deep neural network based on motion data from human-human trials to predict human intent based on past motion.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-03T21:23:12Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.