Assessing Dataset Bias in Computer Vision
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.01811v1
- Date: Tue, 3 May 2022 22:45:49 GMT
- Title: Assessing Dataset Bias in Computer Vision
- Authors: Athiya Deviyani
- Abstract summary: biases have the tendency to propagate to the models that train on them, often leading to a poor performance in the minority class.
We will apply several augmentation techniques on a sample of the UTKFace dataset, such as undersampling, geometric transformations, variational autoencoders (VAEs), and generative adversarial networks (GANs)
We were able to show that our model has a better overall performance and consistency on age and ethnicity classification on multiple datasets when compared with the FairFace model.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: A biased dataset is a dataset that generally has attributes with an uneven
class distribution. These biases have the tendency to propagate to the models
that train on them, often leading to a poor performance in the minority class.
In this project, we will explore the extent to which various data augmentation
methods alleviate intrinsic biases within the dataset. We will apply several
augmentation techniques on a sample of the UTKFace dataset, such as
undersampling, geometric transformations, variational autoencoders (VAEs), and
generative adversarial networks (GANs). We then trained a classifier for each
of the augmented datasets and evaluated their performance on the native test
set and on external facial recognition datasets. We have also compared their
performance to the state-of-the-art attribute classifier trained on the
FairFace dataset. Through experimentation, we were able to find that training
the model on StarGAN-generated images led to the best overall performance. We
also found that training on geometrically transformed images lead to a similar
performance with a much quicker training time. Additionally, the best
performing models also exhibit a uniform performance across the classes within
each attribute. This signifies that the model was also able to mitigate the
biases present in the baseline model that was trained on the original training
set. Finally, we were able to show that our model has a better overall
performance and consistency on age and ethnicity classification on multiple
datasets when compared with the FairFace model. Our final model has an accuracy
on the UTKFace test set of 91.75%, 91.30%, and 87.20% for the gender, age, and
ethnicity attribute respectively, with a standard deviation of less than 0.1
between the accuracies of the classes of each attribute.
Related papers
- Distributionally Generative Augmentation for Fair Facial Attribute Classification [69.97710556164698]
Facial Attribute Classification (FAC) holds substantial promise in widespread applications.
FAC models trained by traditional methodologies can be unfair by exhibiting accuracy inconsistencies across varied data subpopulations.
This work proposes a novel, generation-based two-stage framework to train a fair FAC model on biased data without additional annotation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-11T10:50:53Z) - Adversarial Augmentation Training Makes Action Recognition Models More
Robust to Realistic Video Distribution Shifts [13.752169303624147]
Action recognition models often lack robustness when faced with natural distribution shifts between training and test data.
We propose two novel evaluation methods to assess model resilience to such distribution disparity.
We experimentally demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed adversarial augmentation approach over baselines across three state-of-the-art action recognition models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-21T05:50:39Z) - Analyzing Bias in Diffusion-based Face Generation Models [75.80072686374564]
Diffusion models are increasingly popular in synthetic data generation and image editing applications.
We investigate the presence of bias in diffusion-based face generation models with respect to attributes such as gender, race, and age.
We examine how dataset size affects the attribute composition and perceptual quality of both diffusion and Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) based face generation models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-10T18:22:31Z) - Leaving Reality to Imagination: Robust Classification via Generated
Datasets [24.411444438920988]
Recent research on robustness has revealed significant performance gaps between neural image classifiers trained on datasets similar to the test set.
We study the question: How do generated datasets influence the natural robustness of image classifiers?
We find that Imagenet classifiers trained on real data augmented with generated data achieve higher accuracy and effective robustness than standard training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-05T22:49:33Z) - Effective Robustness against Natural Distribution Shifts for Models with
Different Training Data [113.21868839569]
"Effective robustness" measures the extra out-of-distribution robustness beyond what can be predicted from the in-distribution (ID) performance.
We propose a new evaluation metric to evaluate and compare the effective robustness of models trained on different data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-02T19:28:41Z) - Feature Weaken: Vicinal Data Augmentation for Classification [1.7013938542585925]
We use Feature Weaken to construct the vicinal data distribution with the same cosine similarity for model training.
This work can not only improve the classification performance and generalization of the model, but also stabilize the model training and accelerate the model convergence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-20T11:00:23Z) - Learning from Mixed Datasets: A Monotonic Image Quality Assessment Model [17.19991754976893]
We propose a monotonic neural network for IQA model learning with different datasets combined.
In particular, our model consists of a dataset-shared quality regressor and several dataset-specific quality transformers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-21T15:53:59Z) - EllSeg-Gen, towards Domain Generalization for head-mounted eyetracking [19.913297057204357]
We show that convolutional networks excel at extracting gaze features despite the presence of such artifacts.
We compare the performance of a single model trained with multiple datasets against a pool of models trained on individual datasets.
Results indicate that models tested on datasets in which eye images exhibit higher appearance variability benefit from multiset training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-04T08:35:52Z) - No Fear of Heterogeneity: Classifier Calibration for Federated Learning
with Non-IID Data [78.69828864672978]
A central challenge in training classification models in the real-world federated system is learning with non-IID data.
We propose a novel and simple algorithm called Virtual Representations (CCVR), which adjusts the classifier using virtual representations sampled from an approximated ssian mixture model.
Experimental results demonstrate that CCVR state-of-the-art performance on popular federated learning benchmarks including CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and CINIC-10.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-09T12:02:29Z) - Comparing Test Sets with Item Response Theory [53.755064720563]
We evaluate 29 datasets using predictions from 18 pretrained Transformer models on individual test examples.
We find that Quoref, HellaSwag, and MC-TACO are best suited for distinguishing among state-of-the-art models.
We also observe span selection task format, which is used for QA datasets like QAMR or SQuAD2.0, is effective in differentiating between strong and weak models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-01T22:33:53Z) - Omni-supervised Facial Expression Recognition via Distilled Data [120.11782405714234]
We propose omni-supervised learning to exploit reliable samples in a large amount of unlabeled data for network training.
We experimentally verify that the new dataset can significantly improve the ability of the learned FER model.
To tackle this, we propose to apply a dataset distillation strategy to compress the created dataset into several informative class-wise images.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-18T09:36:51Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.