A Property Induction Framework for Neural Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.06910v1
• Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 22:05:49 GMT
• Title: A Property Induction Framework for Neural Language Models
• Authors: Kanishka Misra, Julia Taylor Rayz, Allyson Ettinger
• Abstract summary: We present a framework that uses neural-network language models (LMs) to perform property induction. We find that LMs show an inductive preference to generalize novel properties on the basis of category membership.
• Score: 8.08493736237816
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: To what extent can experience from language contribute to our conceptual knowledge? Computational explorations of this question have shed light on the ability of powerful neural language models (LMs) -- informed solely through text input -- to encode and elicit information about concepts and properties. To extend this line of research, we present a framework that uses neural-network language models (LMs) to perform property induction -- a task in which humans generalize novel property knowledge (has sesamoid bones) from one or more concepts (robins) to others (sparrows, canaries). Patterns of property induction observed in humans have shed considerable light on the nature and organization of human conceptual knowledge. Inspired by this insight, we use our framework to explore the property inductions of LMs, and find that they show an inductive preference to generalize novel properties on the basis of category membership, suggesting the presence of a taxonomic bias in their representations.

Related papers

• Interpreting Pretrained Language Models via Concept Bottlenecks [55.47515772358389]
  Pretrained language models (PLMs) have made significant strides in various natural language processing tasks. The lack of interpretability due to their black-box'' nature poses challenges for responsible implementation. We propose a novel approach to interpreting PLMs by employing high-level, meaningful concepts that are easily understandable for humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-08T20:41:18Z)
• OC-NMN: Object-centric Compositional Neural Module Network for Generative Visual Analogical Reasoning [49.12350554270196]
  We show how modularity can be leveraged to derive a compositional data augmentation framework inspired by imagination. Our method, denoted Object-centric Compositional Neural Module Network (OC-NMN), decomposes visual generative reasoning tasks into a series of primitives applied to objects without using a domain-specific language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-28T20:12:58Z)
• SINC: Self-Supervised In-Context Learning for Vision-Language Tasks [64.44336003123102]
  We propose a framework to enable in-context learning in large language models. A meta-model can learn on self-supervised prompts consisting of tailored demonstrations. Experiments show that SINC outperforms gradient-based methods in various vision-language tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-15T08:33:08Z)
• Commonsense Knowledge Transfer for Pre-trained Language Models [83.01121484432801]
  We introduce commonsense knowledge transfer, a framework to transfer the commonsense knowledge stored in a neural commonsense knowledge model to a general-purpose pre-trained language model. It first exploits general texts to form queries for extracting commonsense knowledge from the neural commonsense knowledge model. It then refines the language model with two self-supervised objectives: commonsense mask infilling and commonsense relation prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-04T15:44:51Z)
• Mapping Knowledge Representations to Concepts: A Review and New Perspectives [0.6875312133832078]
  This review focuses on research that aims to associate internal representations with human understandable concepts. We find this taxonomy and theories of causality, useful for understanding what can be expected, and not expected, from neural network explanations. The analysis additionally uncovers an ambiguity in the reviewed literature related to the goal of model explainability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-31T12:56:12Z)
• Language Models as Inductive Reasoners [125.99461874008703]
  We propose a new paradigm (task) for inductive reasoning, which is to induce natural language rules from natural language facts. We create a dataset termed DEER containing 1.2k rule-fact pairs for the task, where rules and facts are written in natural language. We provide the first and comprehensive analysis of how well pretrained language models can induce natural language rules from natural language facts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-21T11:12:14Z)
• Acquiring and Modelling Abstract Commonsense Knowledge via Conceptualization [49.00409552570441]
  We study the role of conceptualization in commonsense reasoning, and formulate a framework to replicate human conceptual induction. We apply the framework to ATOMIC, a large-scale human-annotated CKG, aided by the taxonomy Probase.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-03T12:24:49Z)
• Discovering Latent Concepts Learned in BERT [21.760620298330235]
  We study what latent concepts exist in the pre-trained BERT model. We also release a novel BERT ConceptNet dataset (BCN) consisting of 174 concept labels and 1M annotated instances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-15T09:45:34Z)
• On Semantic Cognition, Inductive Generalization, and Language Models [0.2538209532048867]
  My research focuses on understanding semantic knowledge in neural network models trained solely to predict natural language (referred to as language models, or LMs) I propose a framework inspired by 'inductive reasoning,' a phenomenon that sheds light on how humans utilize background knowledge to make inductive leaps and generalize from new pieces of information about concepts and their properties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-04T03:19:52Z)
• Schr\"odinger's Tree -- On Syntax and Neural Language Models [10.296219074343785]
  Language models have emerged as NLP's workhorse, displaying increasingly fluent generation capabilities. We observe a lack of clarity across numerous dimensions, which influences the hypotheses that researchers form. We outline the implications of the different types of research questions exhibited in studies on syntax.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-17T18:25:23Z)
• A Survey of Knowledge Enhanced Pre-trained Models [28.160826399552462]
  We refer to pre-trained language models with knowledge injection as knowledge-enhanced pre-trained language models (KEPLMs) These models demonstrate deep understanding and logical reasoning and introduce interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-01T08:51:58Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.