Distance-based resource quantification for sets of quantum measurements
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.08546v2
- Date: Tue, 2 May 2023 06:30:14 GMT
- Title: Distance-based resource quantification for sets of quantum measurements
- Authors: Lucas Tendick, Martin Kliesch, Hermann Kampermann, Dagmar Bru{\ss}
- Abstract summary: We show that distance functions between quantum states induce resource monotones for convex resource theories of measurements.
By focusing on a distance based on the diamond norm, we establish a hierarchy of measurement resources and derive analytical bounds on the incompatibility of any set of measurements.
Our results provide a general framework to compare distance-based resources for sets of measurements and allow us to obtain limitations on Bell-type experiments.
- Score: 0.5735035463793007
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The advantage that quantum systems provide for certain quantum information
processing tasks over their classical counterparts can be quantified within the
general framework of resource theories. Certain distance functions between
quantum states have successfully been used to quantify resources like
entanglement and coherence. Perhaps surprisingly, such a distance-based
approach has not been adopted to study resources of quantum measurements, where
other geometric quantifiers are used instead. Here, we define distance
functions between sets of quantum measurements and show that they naturally
induce resource monotones for convex resource theories of measurements. By
focusing on a distance based on the diamond norm, we establish a hierarchy of
measurement resources and derive analytical bounds on the incompatibility of
any set of measurements. We show that these bounds are tight for certain
projective measurements based on mutually unbiased bases and identify scenarios
where different measurement resources attain the same value when quantified by
our resource monotone. Our results provide a general framework to compare
distance-based resources for sets of measurements and allow us to obtain
limitations on Bell-type experiments.
Related papers
- Classification of joint quantum measurements based on entanglement cost of localization [42.72938925647165]
We propose a systematic classification of joint measurements based on entanglement cost.
We show how to numerically explore higher levels and construct generalizations to higher dimensions and multipartite settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-01T18:00:01Z) - Effect of the readout efficiency of quantum measurement on the system entanglement [44.99833362998488]
We quantify the entanglement for a particle on a 1d quantum random walk under inefficient monitoring.
We find that the system's maximal mean entanglement at the measurement-induced quantum-to-classical crossover is in different ways by the measurement strength and inefficiency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-29T18:10:05Z) - A universal scheme to self-test any quantum state and extremal measurement [41.94295877935867]
quantum network considered in this work is the simple star network, which is implementable using current technologies.
For our purposes, we also construct a scheme that can be used to self-test the two-dimensional tomographically complete set of measurements with an arbitrary number of parties.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-07T16:20:28Z) - Enhanced Entanglement in the Measurement-Altered Quantum Ising Chain [46.99825956909532]
Local quantum measurements do not simply disentangle degrees of freedom, but may actually strengthen the entanglement in the system.
This paper explores how a finite density of local measurement modifies a given state's entanglement structure.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-04T09:51:00Z) - Quantifying Qubit Magic Resource with Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill Encoding [58.720142291102135]
We define a resource measure for magic, the sought-after property in most fault-tolerant quantum computers.
Our formulation is based on bosonic codes, well-studied tools in continuous-variable quantum computation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-27T12:56:01Z) - Measurement-Based Quantum Computation [0.0]
Measurement-based quantum computation is a framework of quantum computation.
It originates from the one-way quantum computer of Raussendorf and Briegel.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-21T11:45:02Z) - Asymptotically Consistent Measures of General Quantum Resources:
Discord, Non-Markovianity, and Non-Gaussianity [1.90365714903665]
In this paper, we establish an alternative axiom, of resource measures, which quantify resources without contradicting the rates of the resource transformation.
Results show that consistent resource measures are widely applicable to the quantitative analysis of various quantum-dimensional properties.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-09T19:08:36Z) - Operational quantification of continuous-variable quantum resources [6.308539010172309]
We introduce a general method of quantifying resources for continuous-variable quantum systems based on the measure.
We show that the robustness constitutes a well-behaved, bona fide resource quantifier in any convex resource theory.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-23T18:00:03Z) - Quantifying coherence of quantum measurements [0.0]
We show that any statistical distance can be adopted to define a coherence monotone of measurement.
We specifically introduce a coherence monotone of measurement in terms of off-diagonal elements of Positive-Operator-Valued Measure (POVM) components.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-10T09:57:28Z) - Direct estimation of quantum coherence by collective measurements [54.97898890263183]
We introduce a collective measurement scheme for estimating the amount of coherence in quantum states.
Our scheme outperforms other estimation methods based on tomography or adaptive measurements.
We show that our method is accessible with today's technology by implementing it experimentally with photons.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-06T03:50:42Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.