Prismal view of ethics

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.13370v2
• Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2022 13:10:17 GMT
• Title: Prismal view of ethics
• Authors: Sarah Isufi, Kristijan Poje, Igor Vukobratovic and Mario Brcic
• Abstract summary: We want to connect ethics to games, talk about the performance of ethics, introduce curiosity into the interplay between competing and coordinating in well-performing ethics. This analysis is the first step toward finding modeling aspects that might be used in AI ethics for integrating modern AI systems into human society.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We shall have a hard look at ethics and try to extract insights in the form of abstract properties that might become tools. We want to connect ethics to games, talk about the performance of ethics, introduce curiosity into the interplay between competing and coordinating in well-performing ethics, and offer a view of possible developments that could unify increasing aggregates of entities. All this is under a long shadow cast by computational complexity that is quite negative about games. This analysis is the first step toward finding modeling aspects that might be used in AI ethics for integrating modern AI systems into human society.

Related papers

• Quelle {é}thique pour quelle IA ? [0.0]
  This study proposes an analysis of the different types of ethical approaches involved in the ethics of AI. The author introduces to the contemporary need for and meaning of ethics, distinguishes it from other registers of normativities and underlines its inadequacy to formalization. The study concludes with a reflection on the reasons why a human ethics of AI based on a pragmatic practice of contextual ethics remains necessary and irreducible to any formalization or automated treatment of the ethical questions that arise for humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-21T08:13:02Z)
• Power and Play: Investigating "License to Critique" in Teams' AI Ethics Discussions [8.149400593848387]
  We investigate how standards enact discursive closure and how power relations affect whether and how people raise critique. We report on how particular affordances of a game may influence discussion, and find that the hypothetical context is unlikely to be a viable mechanism for real world change. We discuss our finding that games are unlikely to enable direct changes to products or practice, but may be more likely to allow members to find critically-aligned allies for future collective action.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-27T23:09:50Z)
• AI-Generated Images as Data Source: The Dawn of Synthetic Era [61.879821573066216]
  generative AI has unlocked the potential to create synthetic images that closely resemble real-world photographs. This paper explores the innovative concept of harnessing these AI-generated images as new data sources. In contrast to real data, AI-generated data exhibit remarkable advantages, including unmatched abundance and scalability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T06:55:19Z)
• The Ethics of AI in Games [4.691076280925923]
  Video games are one of the richest and most popular forms of human-computer interaction. As artificial intelligence (AI) tools are gradually adopted by the game industry a series of ethical concerns arise. This paper calls for an open dialogue and action for the games of today and the virtual spaces of the future.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-12T11:41:05Z)
• When to Make Exceptions: Exploring Language Models as Accounts of Human Moral Judgment [96.77970239683475]
  AI systems need to be able to understand, interpret and predict human moral judgments and decisions. A central challenge for AI safety is capturing the flexibility of the human moral mind. We present a novel challenge set consisting of rule-breaking question answering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-04T09:04:27Z)
• Towards Artificial Virtuous Agents: Games, Dilemmas and Machine Learning [4.864819846886143]
  We show how a role-playing game can be designed to develop virtues within an artificial agent. We motivate the implementation of virtuous agents that play such role-playing games, and the examination of their decisions through a virtue ethical lens.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-30T07:37:03Z)
• Metaethical Perspectives on 'Benchmarking' AI Ethics [81.65697003067841]
  Benchmarks are seen as the cornerstone for measuring technical progress in Artificial Intelligence (AI) research. An increasingly prominent research area in AI is ethics, which currently has no set of benchmarks nor commonly accepted way for measuring the 'ethicality' of an AI system. We argue that it makes more sense to talk about 'values' rather than 'ethics' when considering the possible actions of present and future AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-11T14:36:39Z)
• Broadening AI Ethics Narratives: An Indic Art View [8.821884881723285]
  The field of arts is perceived to play a key role in elucidating diverse historical and cultural narratives. Most of the works that examine the interplay between the field of arts and AI ethics concern digital artworks. We explore how it non-Western ethical abstractions, methods of learning, and participatory practices can shed light on aspects related to ethical AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-08T00:35:14Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)
• Game Plan: What AI can do for Football, and What Football can do for AI [83.79507996785838]
  Predictive and prescriptive football analytics require new developments and progress at the intersection of statistical learning, game theory, and computer vision. We illustrate that football analytics is a game changer of tremendous value, in terms of not only changing the game of football itself, but also in terms of what this domain can mean for the field of AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-18T10:26:02Z)
• Aligning AI With Shared Human Values [85.2824609130584]
  We introduce the ETHICS dataset, a new benchmark that spans concepts in justice, well-being, duties, virtues, and commonsense morality. We find that current language models have a promising but incomplete ability to predict basic human ethical judgements. Our work shows that progress can be made on machine ethics today, and it provides a steppingstone toward AI that is aligned with human values.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-05T17:59:16Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.