Quantum Error Mitigation via Quantum-Noise-Effect Circuit Groups

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.13907v5
• Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 16:26:23 GMT
• Title: Quantum Error Mitigation via Quantum-Noise-Effect Circuit Groups
• Authors: Yusuke Hama and Hirofumi Nishi
• Abstract summary: Near-term quantum computers are fragile against quantum noise effects. Traditional quantum-error-correcting codes are not implemented on such devices. We propose quantum error mitigation (QEM) scheme for quantum computational errors.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Near-term quantum computers have been built as intermediate-scale quantum devices and are fragile against quantum noise effects, namely, NISQ devices. Traditional quantum-error-correcting codes are not implemented on such devices and to perform quantum computation in good accuracy with these machines we need to develop alternative approaches for mitigating quantum computational errors. In this work, we propose quantum error mitigation (QEM) scheme for quantum computational errors which occur due to couplings with environments during gate operations, i.e., decoherence. To establish our QEM scheme, first we estimate the quantum noise effects on single-qubit states and represent them as groups of quantum circuits, namely, quantum-noise-effect circuit groups. Then our QEM scheme is conducted by subtracting expectation values generated by the quantum-noise-effect circuit groups from that obtained by the quantum circuits for the quantum algorithms under consideration. As a result, the quantum noise effects are reduced, and we obtain approximately the ideal expectation values via the quantum-noise-effect circuit groups and the numbers of elementary quantum circuits composing them scale polynomial with respect to the products of the depths of quantum algorithms and the numbers of register bits. To numerically demonstrate the validity of our QEM scheme, we run noisy quantum simulations of qubits under amplitude damping effects for four types of quantum algorithms. Furthermore, we implement our QEM scheme on IBM Q Experience processors and examine its efficacy. Consequently, the validity of our scheme is verified via both the quantum simulations and the quantum computations on the real quantum devices.

Related papers

• The curse of random quantum data [62.24825255497622]
  We quantify the performances of quantum machine learning in the landscape of quantum data. We find that the training efficiency and generalization capabilities in quantum machine learning will be exponentially suppressed with the increase in qubits. Our findings apply to both the quantum kernel method and the large-width limit of quantum neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-19T12:18:07Z)
• Power Characterization of Noisy Quantum Kernels [52.47151453259434]
  We show that noise may make quantum kernel methods to only have poor prediction capability, even when the generalization error is small. We provide a crucial warning to employ noisy quantum kernel methods for quantum computation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-31T01:02:16Z)
• QuantumSEA: In-Time Sparse Exploration for Noise Adaptive Quantum Circuits [82.50620782471485]
  QuantumSEA is an in-time sparse exploration for noise-adaptive quantum circuits. It aims to achieve two key objectives: (1) implicit circuits capacity during training and (2) noise robustness. Our method establishes state-of-the-art results with only half the number of quantum gates and 2x time saving of circuit executions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-10T22:33:00Z)
• Quantum-Error-Mitigation Circuit Groups for Noisy Quantum Metrology [0.0]
  Quantum technologies work by utilizing properties inherent in quantum systems such as quantum coherence and quantum entanglement. Quantum technologies are fragile against an interaction with an environment (decoherence) and in order to utilize them with high accuracy we need to develop error mitigation techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-03T10:01:42Z)
• Assisted quantum simulation of open quantum systems [0.0]
  We introduce the quantum-assisted quantum algorithm, which reduces the circuit depth of UQA via NISQ technology. We present two quantum-assisted quantum algorithms for simulating open quantum systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-26T11:41:02Z)
• Circuit Symmetry Verification Mitigates Quantum-Domain Impairments [69.33243249411113]
  We propose circuit-oriented symmetry verification that are capable of verifying the commutativity of quantum circuits without the knowledge of the quantum state. In particular, we propose the Fourier-temporal stabilizer (STS) technique, which generalizes the conventional quantum-domain formalism to circuit-oriented stabilizers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-27T21:15:35Z)
• Model-Independent Error Mitigation in Parametric Quantum Circuits and Depolarizing Projection of Quantum Noise [1.5162649964542718]
  Finding ground states and low-lying excitations of a given Hamiltonian is one of the most important problems in many fields of physics. quantum computing on Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices offers the prospect to efficiently perform such computations. Current quantum devices still suffer from inherent quantum noise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-30T16:08:01Z)
• Quantum circuit synthesis of Bell and GHZ states using projective simulation in the NISQ era [0.0]
  We studied the viability of using Projective Simulation, a reinforcement learning technique, to tackle the problem of quantum circuit synthesis for noise quantum computers with limited number of qubits. Our simulations demonstrated that the agent had a good performance but its capacity for learning new circuits decreased as the number of qubits increased.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-27T16:11:27Z)
• Quantum circuit architecture search for variational quantum algorithms [88.71725630554758]
  We propose a resource and runtime efficient scheme termed quantum architecture search (QAS) QAS automatically seeks a near-optimal ansatz to balance benefits and side-effects brought by adding more noisy quantum gates. We implement QAS on both the numerical simulator and real quantum hardware, via the IBM cloud, to accomplish data classification and quantum chemistry tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-20T12:06:27Z)
• Minimizing estimation runtime on noisy quantum computers [0.0]
  "engineered likelihood function" (ELF) is used for carrying out Bayesian inference. We show how the ELF formalism enhances the rate of information gain in sampling as the physical hardware transitions from the regime of noisy quantum computers. This technique speeds up a central component of many quantum algorithms, with applications including chemistry, materials, finance, and beyond.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-16T17:46:18Z)
• An Application of Quantum Annealing Computing to Seismic Inversion [55.41644538483948]
  We apply a quantum algorithm to a D-Wave quantum annealer to solve a small scale seismic inversions problem. The accuracy achieved by the quantum computer is at least as good as that of the classical computer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-06T14:18:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.