Bayes Classification using an approximation to the Joint Probability Distribution of the Attributes

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.14779v1
• Date: Sun, 29 May 2022 22:24:02 GMT
• Title: Bayes Classification using an approximation to the Joint Probability Distribution of the Attributes
• Authors: Patrick Hosein and Kevin Baboolal
• Abstract summary: We propose an approach that estimates conditional probabilities using information in the neighbourhood of the test sample. We illustrate the performance of the proposed approach on a wide range of datasets taken from the University of California at Irvine (UCI) Machine Learning Repository.
• Score: 1.0660480034605242
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The Naive-Bayes classifier is widely used due to its simplicity, speed and accuracy. However this approach fails when, for at least one attribute value in a test sample, there are no corresponding training samples with that attribute value. This is known as the zero frequency problem and is typically addressed using Laplace Smoothing. However, Laplace Smoothing does not take into account the statistical characteristics of the neighbourhood of the attribute values of the test sample. Gaussian Naive Bayes addresses this but the resulting Gaussian model is formed from global information. We instead propose an approach that estimates conditional probabilities using information in the neighbourhood of the test sample. In this case we no longer need to make the assumption of independence of attribute values and hence consider the joint probability distribution conditioned on the given class which means our approach (unlike the Gaussian and Laplace approaches) takes into consideration dependencies among the attribute values. We illustrate the performance of the proposed approach on a wide range of datasets taken from the University of California at Irvine (UCI) Machine Learning Repository. We also include results for the $k$-NN classifier and demonstrate that the proposed approach is simple, robust and outperforms standard approaches.

Related papers

• Doubly Robust Conditional Independence Testing with Generative Neural Networks [8.323172773256449]
  This article addresses the problem of testing the conditional independence of two generic random vectors $X$ and $Y$ given a third random vector $Z$. We propose a new non-parametric testing procedure that avoids explicitly estimating any conditional distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-25T01:28:59Z)
• Covariate Assisted Entity Ranking with Sparse Intrinsic Scores [3.2839905453386162]
  We introduce novel model identification conditions and examine the regularized penalized Maximum Likelihood Estimator statistical rates. We also apply our method to the goodness-of-fit test for models with no latent intrinsic scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-09T19:58:54Z)
• On diffusion-based generative models and their error bounds: The log-concave case with full convergence estimates [5.13323375365494]
  We provide theoretical guarantees for the convergence behaviour of diffusion-based generative models under strongly log-concave data. Our class of functions used for score estimation is made of Lipschitz continuous functions avoiding any Lipschitzness assumption on the score function. This approach yields the best known convergence rate for our sampling algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-22T18:40:45Z)
• Variational Classification [51.2541371924591]
  We derive a variational objective to train the model, analogous to the evidence lower bound (ELBO) used to train variational auto-encoders. Treating inputs to the softmax layer as samples of a latent variable, our abstracted perspective reveals a potential inconsistency. We induce a chosen latent distribution, instead of the implicit assumption found in a standard softmax layer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-17T17:47:19Z)
• Robust Outlier Rejection for 3D Registration with Variational Bayes [70.98659381852787]
  We develop a novel variational non-local network-based outlier rejection framework for robust alignment. We propose a voting-based inlier searching strategy to cluster the high-quality hypothetical inliers for transformation estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-04T03:48:56Z)
• A Statistical Model for Predicting Generalization in Few-Shot Classification [6.158812834002346]
  We introduce a Gaussian model of the feature distribution to predict the generalization error. We show that our approach outperforms alternatives such as the leave-one-out cross-validation strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-13T10:21:15Z)
• Predicting Out-of-Domain Generalization with Neighborhood Invariance [59.05399533508682]
  We propose a measure of a classifier's output invariance in a local transformation neighborhood. Our measure is simple to calculate, does not depend on the test point's true label, and can be applied even in out-of-domain (OOD) settings. In experiments on benchmarks in image classification, sentiment analysis, and natural language inference, we demonstrate a strong and robust correlation between our measure and actual OOD generalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-05T14:55:16Z)
• Sampling from Arbitrary Functions via PSD Models [55.41644538483948]
  We take a two-step approach by first modeling the probability distribution and then sampling from that model. We show that these models can approximate a large class of densities concisely using few evaluations, and present a simple algorithm to effectively sample from these models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-20T12:25:22Z)
• Evaluating State-of-the-Art Classification Models Against Bayes Optimality [106.50867011164584]
  We show that we can compute the exact Bayes error of generative models learned using normalizing flows. We use our approach to conduct a thorough investigation of state-of-the-art classification models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T06:21:20Z)
• Probabilistic Anchor Assignment with IoU Prediction for Object Detection [9.703212439661097]
  In object detection, determining which anchors to assign as positive or negative samples, known as anchor assignment, has been revealed as a core procedure that can significantly affect a model's performance. We propose a novel anchor assignment strategy that adaptively separates anchors into positive and negative samples for a ground truth bounding box according to the model's learning status.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-16T04:26:57Z)
• Good Classifiers are Abundant in the Interpolating Regime [64.72044662855612]
  We develop a methodology to compute precisely the full distribution of test errors among interpolating classifiers. We find that test errors tend to concentrate around a small typical value $varepsilon*$, which deviates substantially from the test error of worst-case interpolating model. Our results show that the usual style of analysis in statistical learning theory may not be fine-grained enough to capture the good generalization performance observed in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-22T21:12:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.