Remote Collaboration Fuses Fewer Breakthrough Ideas

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.01878v4
• Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 17:59:50 GMT
• Title: Remote Collaboration Fuses Fewer Breakthrough Ideas
• Authors: Yiling Lin, Carl Benedikt Frey, Lingfei Wu
• Abstract summary: We show that researchers in remote teams are consistently less likely to make breakthrough discoveries. We find that among distributed team members, collaboration centers on late-stage, technical tasks involving more codified knowledge.
• Score: 40.14431045018876
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Theories of innovation emphasize the role of social networks and teams as facilitators of breakthrough discoveries. Around the world, scientists and inventors today are more plentiful and interconnected than ever before. But while there are more people making discoveries, and more ideas that can be reconfigured in novel ways, research suggests that new ideas are getting harder to find-contradicting recombinant growth theory. In this paper, we shed new light on this apparent puzzle. Analyzing 20 million research articles and 4 million patent applications across the globe over the past half-century, we begin by documenting the rise of remote collaboration across cities, underlining the growing interconnectedness of scientists and inventors globally. We further show that across all fields, periods, and team sizes, researchers in these remote teams are consistently less likely to make breakthrough discoveries relative to their onsite counterparts. Creating a dataset that allows us to explore the division of labor in knowledge production within teams and across space, we find that among distributed team members, collaboration centers on late-stage, technical tasks involving more codified knowledge. Yet they are less likely to join forces in conceptual tasks-such as conceiving new ideas and designing research-when knowledge is tacit. We conclude that despite striking improvements in digital technology in recent years, remote teams are less likely to integrate the knowledge of their members to produce new, disruptive ideas.

Related papers

• Two Heads Are Better Than One: A Multi-Agent System Has the Potential to Improve Scientific Idea Generation [48.29699224989952]
  VirSci organizes a team of agents to collaboratively generate, evaluate, and refine research ideas. We show that this multi-agent approach outperforms the state-of-the-art method in producing novel and impactful scientific ideas.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-12T07:16:22Z)
• O1 Replication Journey: A Strategic Progress Report -- Part 1 [52.062216849476776]
  This paper introduces a pioneering approach to artificial intelligence research, embodied in our O1 Replication Journey. Our methodology addresses critical challenges in modern AI research, including the insularity of prolonged team-based projects. We propose the journey learning paradigm, which encourages models to learn not just shortcuts, but the complete exploration process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T15:13:01Z)
• A Survey of Neural Code Intelligence: Paradigms, Advances and Beyond [84.95530356322621]
  This survey presents a systematic review of the advancements in code intelligence. It covers over 50 representative models and their variants, more than 20 categories of tasks, and an extensive coverage of over 680 related works. Building on our examination of the developmental trajectories, we further investigate the emerging synergies between code intelligence and broader machine intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T08:54:56Z)
• Forecasting high-impact research topics via machine learning on evolving knowledge graphs [0.8158530638728501]
  We show how to predict the impact of onsets of ideas that have never been published by researchers. We developed a large evolving knowledge graph built from more than 21 million scientific papers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T18:09:38Z)
• AI for Science: An Emerging Agenda [30.260160661295682]
  This report documents the programme and the outcomes of Dagstuhl Seminar 22382 "Machine Learning for Science: Bridging Data-Driven and Mechanistic Modelling" The transformative potential of AI stems from its widespread applicability across disciplines, and will only be achieved through integration across research domains. Alongside technical advances, the next wave of progress in the field will come from building a community of machine learning researchers, domain experts, citizen scientists, and engineers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-07T20:21:43Z)
• Coordinated Science Laboratory 70th Anniversary Symposium: The Future of Computing [80.72844751804166]
  In 2021, the Coordinated Science Laboratory CSL hosted the Future of Computing Symposium to celebrate its 70th anniversary. We summarize the major technological points, insights, and directions that speakers brought forward during the symposium. Participants discussed topics related to new computing paradigms, technologies, algorithms, behaviors, and research challenges to be expected in the future.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-04T17:32:27Z)
• Bridger: Toward Bursting Scientific Filter Bubbles and Boosting Innovation via Novel Author Discovery [22.839876884227536]
  Bridger is a system for facilitating discovery of scholars and their work. We construct a faceted representation of authors using information extracted from their papers and inferred personas. We develop an approach that locates commonalities and contrasts between scientists.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-12T11:24:23Z)
• Learnings from Frontier Development Lab and SpaceML -- AI Accelerators for NASA and ESA [57.06643156253045]
  Research with AI and ML technologies lives in a variety of settings with often asynchronous goals and timelines. We perform a case study of the Frontier Development Lab (FDL), an AI accelerator under a public-private partnership from NASA and ESA. FDL research follows principled practices that are grounded in responsible development, conduct, and dissemination of AI research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-09T21:23:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.