Is $L^2$ Physics-Informed Loss Always Suitable for Training Physics-Informed Neural Network?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.02016v1
• Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2022 15:48:17 GMT
• Title: Is $L^2$ Physics-Informed Loss Always Suitable for Training Physics-Informed Neural Network?
• Authors: Chuwei Wang, Shanda Li, Di He, Liwei Wang
• Abstract summary: The $L2$ Physics-Informed Loss is the de-facto standard in training Physics-Informed Neural Networks. We develop a novel PINN training to minimize the $Linfty$ loss for HJB equations which is in a similar spirit to adversarial training.
• Score: 28.458641579364457
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN) approach is a new and promising way to solve partial differential equations using deep learning. The $L^2$ Physics-Informed Loss is the de-facto standard in training Physics-Informed Neural Networks. In this paper, we challenge this common practice by investigating the relationship between the loss function and the approximation quality of the learned solution. In particular, we leverage the concept of stability in the literature of partial differential equation to study the asymptotic behavior of the learned solution as the loss approaches zero. With this concept, we study an important class of high-dimensional non-linear PDEs in optimal control, the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman(HJB) Equation, and prove that for general $L^p$ Physics-Informed Loss, a wide class of HJB equation is stable only if $p$ is sufficiently large. Therefore, the commonly used $L^2$ loss is not suitable for training PINN on those equations, while $L^{\infty}$ loss is a better choice. Based on the theoretical insight, we develop a novel PINN training algorithm to minimize the $L^{\infty}$ loss for HJB equations which is in a similar spirit to adversarial training. The effectiveness of the proposed algorithm is empirically demonstrated through experiments.

Related papers

• On the estimation rate of Bayesian PINN for inverse problems [10.100602879566782]
  Solving partial differential equations (PDEs) and their inverse problems using Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) is a rapidly growing approach in the physics and machine learning community. We study the behavior of a Bayesian PINN estimator of the solution of a PDE from $n$ independent noisy measurement of the solution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-21T01:13:18Z)
• NeuralStagger: Accelerating Physics-constrained Neural PDE Solver with Spatial-temporal Decomposition [67.46012350241969]
  This paper proposes a general acceleration methodology called NeuralStagger. It decomposing the original learning tasks into several coarser-resolution subtasks. We demonstrate the successful application of NeuralStagger on 2D and 3D fluid dynamics simulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-20T19:36:52Z)
• DEQGAN: Learning the Loss Function for PINNs with Generative Adversarial Networks [1.0499611180329804]
  This work presents Differential Equation GAN (DEQGAN), a novel method for solving differential equations using generative adversarial networks. We show that DEQGAN achieves multiple orders of magnitude lower mean squared errors than PINNs. We also show that DEQGAN achieves solution accuracies that are competitive with popular numerical methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-15T06:39:47Z)
• Physics-Informed Neural Network Method for Parabolic Differential Equations with Sharply Perturbed Initial Conditions [68.8204255655161]
  We develop a physics-informed neural network (PINN) model for parabolic problems with a sharply perturbed initial condition. Localized large gradients in the ADE solution make the (common in PINN) Latin hypercube sampling of the equation's residual highly inefficient. We propose criteria for weights in the loss function that produce a more accurate PINN solution than those obtained with the weights selected via other methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-18T05:00:24Z)
• Enhanced Physics-Informed Neural Networks with Augmented Lagrangian Relaxation Method (AL-PINNs) [1.7403133838762446]
  Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) are powerful approximators of solutions to nonlinear partial differential equations (PDEs) We propose an Augmented Lagrangian relaxation method for PINNs (AL-PINNs) We demonstrate through various numerical experiments that AL-PINNs yield a much smaller relative error compared with that of state-of-the-art adaptive loss-balancing algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-29T08:33:11Z)
• Learning Physics-Informed Neural Networks without Stacked Back-propagation [82.26566759276105]
  We develop a novel approach that can significantly accelerate the training of Physics-Informed Neural Networks. In particular, we parameterize the PDE solution by the Gaussian smoothed model and show that, derived from Stein's Identity, the second-order derivatives can be efficiently calculated without back-propagation. Experimental results show that our proposed method can achieve competitive error compared to standard PINN training but is two orders of magnitude faster.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-18T18:07:54Z)
• Physics-Informed Neural Operator for Learning Partial Differential Equations [55.406540167010014]
  PINO is the first hybrid approach incorporating data and PDE constraints at different resolutions to learn the operator. The resulting PINO model can accurately approximate the ground-truth solution operator for many popular PDE families.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-06T03:41:34Z)
• Learning in Sinusoidal Spaces with Physics-Informed Neural Networks [22.47355575565345]
  A physics-informed neural network (PINN) uses physics-augmented loss functions to ensure its output is consistent with fundamental physics laws. It turns out to be difficult to train an accurate PINN model for many problems in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-20T07:42:41Z)
• Conditional physics informed neural networks [85.48030573849712]
  We introduce conditional PINNs (physics informed neural networks) for estimating the solution of classes of eigenvalue problems. We show that a single deep neural network can learn the solution of partial differential equations for an entire class of problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-06T18:29:14Z)
• dNNsolve: an efficient NN-based PDE solver [62.997667081978825]
  We introduce dNNsolve, that makes use of dual Neural Networks to solve ODEs/PDEs. We show that dNNsolve is capable of solving a broad range of ODEs/PDEs in 1, 2 and 3 spacetime dimensions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-15T19:14:41Z)
• Large-time asymptotics in deep learning [0.0]
  We consider the impact of the final time $T$ (which may indicate the depth of a corresponding ResNet) in training. For the classical $L2$--regularized empirical risk minimization problem, we show that the training error is at most of the order $mathcalOleft(frac1Tright)$. In the setting of $ellp$--distance losses, we prove that both the training error and the optimal parameters are at most of the order $mathcalOleft(e-mu
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-06T07:33:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.