(Im)possibility of Collective Intelligence
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.02786v2
- Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 16:43:44 GMT
- Title: (Im)possibility of Collective Intelligence
- Authors: Krikamol Muandet,
- Abstract summary: This work provides a minimum requirement in terms of intuitive and reasonable axioms under which the only rational learning algorithm in heterogeneous environments is an empirical risk minimization (ERM)<n>Our (im)possibility result underscores the fundamental trade-off that any algorithms will face in order to achieve Collective Intelligence (CI)<n>Ultimately, collective learning in heterogeneous environments are inherently hard because, in critical areas of machine learning such as out-of-distribution generalization, federated/collaborative learning, algorithmic fairness, and multi-modal learning, it can be infeasible to make meaningful comparisons of model predictive performance across environments.
- Score: 6.922375282367237
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Modern applications of AI involve training and deploying machine learning models across heterogeneous and potentially massive environments. Emerging diversity of data not only brings about new possibilities to advance AI systems, but also restricts the extent to which information can be shared across environments due to pressing concerns such as privacy, security, and equity. Based on a novel characterization of learning algorithms as choice correspondences on a hypothesis space, this work provides a minimum requirement in terms of intuitive and reasonable axioms under which the only rational learning algorithm in heterogeneous environments is an empirical risk minimization (ERM) that unilaterally learns from a single environment without information sharing across environments. Our (im)possibility result underscores the fundamental trade-off that any algorithms will face in order to achieve Collective Intelligence (CI), i.e., the ability to learn across heterogeneous environments. Ultimately, collective learning in heterogeneous environments are inherently hard because, in critical areas of machine learning such as out-of-distribution generalization, federated/collaborative learning, algorithmic fairness, and multi-modal learning, it can be infeasible to make meaningful comparisons of model predictive performance across environments.
Related papers
- Advancing Deep Learning through Probability Engineering: A Pragmatic Paradigm for Modern AI [9.126527152752146]
This paper proposes a novel concept, Probability Engineering, which treats the already-learned probability distributions within deep learning as engineering artifacts.
We introduce novel techniques and constraints to refine existing probability distributions, improving their robustness, efficiency, adaptability, or trustworthiness.
Case studies demonstrate how probability distributions once treated as static objects can be engineered to meet the diverse and evolving requirements of large-scale, data-intensive, and trustworthy AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-19T07:48:23Z) - Training a Generally Curious Agent [86.84089201249104]
Paprika is a fine-tuning approach that enables language models to develop general decision-making capabilities.<n>Paprika teaches models to explore and adapt their behavior on a new task based on environment feedback in-context without more gradient updates.<n>Results suggest a promising path towards AI systems that can autonomously solve sequential decision-making problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-24T18:56:58Z) - Agential AI for Integrated Continual Learning, Deliberative Behavior, and Comprehensible Models [15.376349115976534]
We present the initial design for an AI system, Agential AI (AAI)
AAI's core is a learning method that models temporal dynamics with guarantees of completeness, minimality, and continual learning.
Preliminary experiments on a simple environment show AAI's effectiveness and potential.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-28T13:09:08Z) - Is Efficient PAC Learning Possible with an Oracle That Responds 'Yes' or 'No'? [26.334900941196082]
We investigate whether the ability to perform ERM, which computes a hypothesis minimizing empirical risk on a given dataset, is necessary for efficient learning.
We show that in real setting of PAC for binary classification, a concept class can be learned using an oracle which only returns a single bit.
Our results extend to the learning setting with a slight strengthening of the oracle, as well as to the partial concept, multiclass and real-valued learning settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-17T15:50:08Z) - Open-world Machine Learning: A Review and New Outlooks [83.6401132743407]
This paper aims to provide a comprehensive introduction to the emerging open-world machine learning paradigm.
It aims to help researchers build more powerful AI systems in their respective fields, and to promote the development of artificial general intelligence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-04T06:25:26Z) - Incorporating simulated spatial context information improves the effectiveness of contrastive learning models [1.4179832037924995]
We present a unique approach, termed Environmental Spatial Similarity (ESS), that complements existing contrastive learning methods.
ESS allows remarkable proficiency in room classification and spatial prediction tasks, especially in unfamiliar environments.
Potentially transformative applications span from robotics to space exploration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-26T03:44:58Z) - Brain-Inspired Computational Intelligence via Predictive Coding [89.6335791546526]
Predictive coding (PC) has shown promising performance in machine intelligence tasks.
PC can model information processing in different brain areas, can be used in cognitive control and robotics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-15T16:37:16Z) - Artificial intelligence is algorithmic mimicry: why artificial "agents"
are not (and won't be) proper agents [0.0]
I investigate what is the prospect of developing artificial general intelligence (AGI)
I compare living and algorithmic systems, with a special focus on the notion of "agency"
It is extremely unlikely that true AGI can be developed in the current algorithmic framework of AI research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-27T19:25:09Z) - Human-Centric Multimodal Machine Learning: Recent Advances and Testbed
on AI-based Recruitment [66.91538273487379]
There is a certain consensus about the need to develop AI applications with a Human-Centric approach.
Human-Centric Machine Learning needs to be developed based on four main requirements: (i) utility and social good; (ii) privacy and data ownership; (iii) transparency and accountability; and (iv) fairness in AI-driven decision-making processes.
We study how current multimodal algorithms based on heterogeneous sources of information are affected by sensitive elements and inner biases in the data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-13T16:44:44Z) - Continual Predictive Learning from Videos [100.27176974654559]
We study a new continual learning problem in the context of video prediction.
We propose the continual predictive learning (CPL) approach, which learns a mixture world model via predictive experience replay.
We construct two new benchmarks based on RoboNet and KTH, in which different tasks correspond to different physical robotic environments or human actions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-12T08:32:26Z) - Human-Algorithm Collaboration: Achieving Complementarity and Avoiding
Unfairness [92.26039686430204]
We show that even in carefully-designed systems, complementary performance can be elusive.
First, we provide a theoretical framework for modeling simple human-algorithm systems.
Next, we use this model to prove conditions where complementarity is impossible.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-17T18:44:41Z) - WenLan 2.0: Make AI Imagine via a Multimodal Foundation Model [74.4875156387271]
We develop a novel foundation model pre-trained with huge multimodal (visual and textual) data.
We show that state-of-the-art results can be obtained on a wide range of downstream tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-27T12:25:21Z) - From Undecidability of Non-Triviality and Finiteness to Undecidability
of Learnability [0.0]
We show that there is no general-purpose procedure for rigorously evaluating whether newly proposed models indeed successfully learn from data.
For PAC binary classification, uniform and universal online learning, and exact learning through teacher-learner interactions, learnability is in general undecidable.
There is no one-size-fits-all algorithm for deciding whether a machine learning model can be successful.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-02T18:00:04Z) - Zero-Shot Reinforcement Learning on Graphs for Autonomous Exploration
Under Uncertainty [6.42522897323111]
We present a framework for self-learning a high-performance exploration policy in a single simulation environment.
We propose a novel approach that uses graph neural networks in conjunction with deep reinforcement learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-11T02:42:17Z) - Quasi-Global Momentum: Accelerating Decentralized Deep Learning on
Heterogeneous Data [77.88594632644347]
Decentralized training of deep learning models is a key element for enabling data privacy and on-device learning over networks.
In realistic learning scenarios, the presence of heterogeneity across different clients' local datasets poses an optimization challenge.
We propose a novel momentum-based method to mitigate this decentralized training difficulty.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-09T11:27:14Z) - Investigating Bi-Level Optimization for Learning and Vision from a
Unified Perspective: A Survey and Beyond [114.39616146985001]
In machine learning and computer vision fields, despite the different motivations and mechanisms, a lot of complex problems contain a series of closely related subproblms.
In this paper, we first uniformly express these complex learning and vision problems from the perspective of Bi-Level Optimization (BLO)
Then we construct a value-function-based single-level reformulation and establish a unified algorithmic framework to understand and formulate mainstream gradient-based BLO methodologies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-27T16:20:23Z) - Offline Learning for Planning: A Summary [0.0]
Training of autonomous agents often requires expensive and unsafe trial-and-error interactions with the environment.
Data sets containing recorded experiences of intelligent agents performing various tasks are accessible on the internet.
In this paper we adumbrate the ideas motivating the development of the state-of-the-art offline learning baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-05T11:41:11Z) - AI Centered on Scene Fitting and Dynamic Cognitive Network [4.228224431041357]
This paper briefly analyzes the advantages and problems of AI mainstream technology and puts forward: To achieve stronger Artificial Intelligence, the end-to-end function calculation must be changed.
It also discusses the concrete scheme named Dynamic Cognitive Network model (DC Net)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-02T06:13:41Z) - Ecological Reinforcement Learning [76.9893572776141]
We study the kinds of environment properties that can make learning under such conditions easier.
understanding how properties of the environment impact the performance of reinforcement learning agents can help us to structure our tasks in ways that make learning tractable.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-22T17:55:03Z) - Guided Uncertainty-Aware Policy Optimization: Combining Learning and
Model-Based Strategies for Sample-Efficient Policy Learning [75.56839075060819]
Traditional robotic approaches rely on an accurate model of the environment, a detailed description of how to perform the task, and a robust perception system to keep track of the current state.
reinforcement learning approaches can operate directly from raw sensory inputs with only a reward signal to describe the task, but are extremely sample-inefficient and brittle.
In this work, we combine the strengths of model-based methods with the flexibility of learning-based methods to obtain a general method that is able to overcome inaccuracies in the robotics perception/actuation pipeline.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-21T19:47:05Z) - Distributed and Democratized Learning: Philosophy and Research
Challenges [80.39805582015133]
We propose a novel design philosophy called democratized learning (Dem-AI)
Inspired by the societal groups of humans, the specialized groups of learning agents in the proposed Dem-AI system are self-organized in a hierarchical structure to collectively perform learning tasks more efficiently.
We present a reference design as a guideline to realize future Dem-AI systems, inspired by various interdisciplinary fields.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-18T08:45:10Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.