Sequential Analysis of a finite number of Coherent states
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.04604v4
- Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 01:15:55 GMT
- Title: Sequential Analysis of a finite number of Coherent states
- Authors: Esteban Mart\'inez-Vargas
- Abstract summary: We investigate an advantage for information processing of ordering a set of states over making a global quantum processing with a fixed number of copies of coherent states.
We find that for the symmetric case $|gammarangle,|-gammarangle$ there is no advantage of taking any batch size $l$.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: We investigate an advantage for information processing of ordering a set of
states over making a global quantum processing with a fixed number of copies of
coherent states. Suppose Alice has $N$ copies of one of two quantum states
$\sigma_0$ or $\sigma_1$ and she gives these states to Bob. Using the optimal
sequential test, the SPRT, we ask if processing the states in batches of size
$l$ is advantageous to optimally distinguish the two hypotheses. We find that
for the symmetric case $\{|\gamma\rangle,|-\gamma\rangle\}$ there is no
advantage of taking any batch size $l$. We give an expression for the optimal
batch size $l_\text{opt}$ in the assymetric case. We give bounds $l_\text{min}$
and $l_\text{max}$ for when $P_S\approx 1$.
Related papers
- Sample-Optimal Quantum Estimators for Pure-State Trace Distance and Fidelity via Samplizer [7.319050391449301]
Trace distance and infidelity, as basic measures of the closeness of quantum states, are commonly used in quantum state discrimination, certification, and tomography.
We present a quantum algorithm that estimates the trace distance and square root fidelity between pure states to within additive error $varepsilon$, given sample access to their identical copies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-28T16:48:21Z) - Measuring quantum relative entropy with finite-size effect [53.64687146666141]
We study the estimation of relative entropy $D(rho|sigma)$ when $sigma$ is known.
Our estimator attains the Cram'er-Rao type bound when the dimension $d$ is fixed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-25T06:07:20Z) - Pseudorandom and Pseudoentangled States from Subset States [49.74460522523316]
A subset state with respect to $S$, a subset of the computational basis, is [ frac1sqrt|S|sum_iin S |irangle.
We show that for any fixed subset size $|S|=s$ such that $s = 2n/omega(mathrmpoly(n))$ and $s=omega(mathrmpoly(n))$, a random subset state is information-theoretically indistinguishable from a Haar random state even provided
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-23T15:52:46Z) - Tight Bounds for Quantum Phase Estimation and Related Problems [0.90238471756546]
We show that a phase estimation algorithm with precision $delta$ and error probability $epsilon$ has cost $Omegaleft(frac1deltalog1epsilonright)$.
We also show that having lots advice (applications of the advice-preparing unitary) does not significantly reduce cost, and neither does knowledge of the eigenbasis of $U$.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-08T17:46:01Z) - Low-Stabilizer-Complexity Quantum States Are Not Pseudorandom [1.0323063834827415]
We show that quantum states with "low stabilizer complexity" can be efficiently distinguished from Haar-random.
We prove that $omega(log(n))$ $T$-gates are necessary for any Clifford+$T$ circuit to prepare computationally pseudorandom quantum states.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-29T03:34:03Z) - Testing matrix product states [5.225550006603552]
We study the problem of testing whether an unknown state $|psirangle$ is a matrix product state (MPS) in the property testing model.
MPS are a class of physically-relevant quantum states which arise in the study of quantum many-body systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-05T21:10:50Z) - Improved Sample Complexity for Incremental Autonomous Exploration in
MDPs [132.88757893161699]
We learn the set of $epsilon$-optimal goal-conditioned policies attaining all states that are incrementally reachable within $L$ steps.
DisCo is the first algorithm that can return an $epsilon/c_min$-optimal policy for any cost-sensitive shortest-path problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-29T14:06:09Z) - Improved quantum data analysis [1.8416014644193066]
We give a quantum "Threshold Search" algorithm that requires only $O(log2 m)/epsilon2)$ samples of a $d$-dimensional state.
We also give an alternative Hypothesis Selection method using $tildeO((log3 m)/epsilon2)$ samples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-22T01:22:37Z) - An Optimal Separation of Randomized and Quantum Query Complexity [67.19751155411075]
We prove that for every decision tree, the absolute values of the Fourier coefficients of a given order $ellsqrtbinomdell (1+log n)ell-1,$ sum to at most $cellsqrtbinomdell (1+log n)ell-1,$ where $n$ is the number of variables, $d$ is the tree depth, and $c>0$ is an absolute constant.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-24T06:50:57Z) - Locally Private Hypothesis Selection [96.06118559817057]
We output a distribution from $mathcalQ$ whose total variation distance to $p$ is comparable to the best such distribution.
We show that the constraint of local differential privacy incurs an exponential increase in cost.
Our algorithms result in exponential improvements on the round complexity of previous methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-21T18:30:48Z) - Quantum Coupon Collector [62.58209964224025]
We study how efficiently a $k$-element set $Ssubseteq[n]$ can be learned from a uniform superposition $|Srangle of its elements.
We give tight bounds on the number of quantum samples needed for every $k$ and $n$, and we give efficient quantum learning algorithms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-18T16:14:55Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.