SafeRL-Kit: Evaluating Efficient Reinforcement Learning Methods for Safe Autonomous Driving

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.08528v1
• Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 03:23:51 GMT
• Title: SafeRL-Kit: Evaluating Efficient Reinforcement Learning Methods for Safe Autonomous Driving
• Authors: Linrui Zhang, Qin Zhang, Li Shen, Bo Yuan, Xueqian Wang
• Abstract summary: We release SafeRL-Kit to benchmark safe RL methods for autonomous driving tasks. SafeRL-Kit contains several latest algorithms specific to zero-constraint-violation tasks, including Safety Layer, Recovery RL, off-policy Lagrangian method, and Feasible Actor-Critic. We conduct a comparative evaluation of the above algorithms in SafeRL-Kit and shed light on their efficacy for safe autonomous driving.
• Score: 12.925039760573092
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Safe reinforcement learning (RL) has achieved significant success on risk-sensitive tasks and shown promise in autonomous driving (AD) as well. Considering the distinctiveness of this community, efficient and reproducible baselines are still lacking for safe AD. In this paper, we release SafeRL-Kit to benchmark safe RL methods for AD-oriented tasks. Concretely, SafeRL-Kit contains several latest algorithms specific to zero-constraint-violation tasks, including Safety Layer, Recovery RL, off-policy Lagrangian method, and Feasible Actor-Critic. In addition to existing approaches, we propose a novel first-order method named Exact Penalty Optimization (EPO) and sufficiently demonstrate its capability in safe AD. All algorithms in SafeRL-Kit are implemented (i) under the off-policy setting, which improves sample efficiency and can better leverage past logs; (ii) with a unified learning framework, providing off-the-shelf interfaces for researchers to incorporate their domain-specific knowledge into fundamental safe RL methods. Conclusively, we conduct a comparative evaluation of the above algorithms in SafeRL-Kit and shed light on their efficacy for safe autonomous driving. The source code is available at \href{ https://github.com/zlr20/saferl_kit}{this https URL}.

Related papers

• Approximate Model-Based Shielding for Safe Reinforcement Learning [83.55437924143615]
  We propose a principled look-ahead shielding algorithm for verifying the performance of learned RL policies. Our algorithm differs from other shielding approaches in that it does not require prior knowledge of the safety-relevant dynamics of the system. We demonstrate superior performance to other safety-aware approaches on a set of Atari games with state-dependent safety-labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-27T15:19:45Z)
• OmniSafe: An Infrastructure for Accelerating Safe Reinforcement Learning Research [3.0536277689386453]
  We introduce a foundational framework designed to expedite SafeRL research endeavors. Our framework encompasses an array of algorithms spanning different RL domains and places heavy emphasis on safety elements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-16T09:22:14Z)
• A Multiplicative Value Function for Safe and Efficient Reinforcement Learning [131.96501469927733]
  We propose a safe model-free RL algorithm with a novel multiplicative value function consisting of a safety critic and a reward critic. The safety critic predicts the probability of constraint violation and discounts the reward critic that only estimates constraint-free returns. We evaluate our method in four safety-focused environments, including classical RL benchmarks augmented with safety constraints and robot navigation tasks with images and raw Lidar scans as observations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-07T18:29:15Z)
• Safety Correction from Baseline: Towards the Risk-aware Policy in Robotics via Dual-agent Reinforcement Learning [64.11013095004786]
  We propose a dual-agent safe reinforcement learning strategy consisting of a baseline and a safe agent. Such a decoupled framework enables high flexibility, data efficiency and risk-awareness for RL-based control. The proposed method outperforms the state-of-the-art safe RL algorithms on difficult robot locomotion and manipulation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-14T03:11:25Z)
• Evaluating Model-free Reinforcement Learning toward Safety-critical Tasks [70.76757529955577]
  This paper revisits prior work in this scope from the perspective of state-wise safe RL. We propose Unrolling Safety Layer (USL), a joint method that combines safety optimization and safety projection. To facilitate further research in this area, we reproduce related algorithms in a unified pipeline and incorporate them into SafeRL-Kit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-12T06:30:17Z)
• Safe Reinforcement Learning using Data-Driven Predictive Control [0.5459797813771499]
  We propose a data-driven safety layer that acts as a filter for unsafe actions. The safety layer penalizes the RL agent if the proposed action is unsafe and replaces it with the closest safe one. In a simulation, we show that our method outperforms state-of-the-art safe RL methods on the robotics navigation problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-20T17:10:40Z)
• Self-Improving Safety Performance of Reinforcement Learning Based Driving with Black-Box Verification Algorithms [0.0]
  We propose a self-improving artificial intelligence system to enhance the safety performance of reinforcement learning (RL)-based autonomous driving (AD) agents. Our approach efficiently discovers safety failures of action decisions in RL-based adaptive cruise control (ACC) applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-29T11:34:17Z)
• Provable Safe Reinforcement Learning with Binary Feedback [62.257383728544006]
  We consider the problem of provable safe RL when given access to an offline oracle providing binary feedback on the safety of state, action pairs. We provide a novel meta algorithm, SABRE, which can be applied to any MDP setting given access to a blackbox PAC RL algorithm for that setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-26T05:37:51Z)
• Provably Safe Reinforcement Learning: Conceptual Analysis, Survey, and Benchmarking [12.719948223824483]
  reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms are crucial to unlock their potential for many real-world tasks. However, vanilla RL and most safe RL approaches do not guarantee safety. We introduce a categorization of existing provably safe RL methods, present the conceptual foundations for both continuous and discrete action spaces, and empirically benchmark existing methods. We provide practical guidance on selecting provably safe RL approaches depending on the safety specification, RL algorithm, and type of action space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-13T16:34:36Z)
• Learning to be Safe: Deep RL with a Safety Critic [72.00568333130391]
  A natural first approach toward safe RL is to manually specify constraints on the policy's behavior. We propose to learn how to be safe in one set of tasks and environments, and then use that learned intuition to constrain future behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-27T20:53:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.