Rarity Score : A New Metric to Evaluate the Uncommonness of Synthesized Images

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.08549v1
• Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 05:16:16 GMT
• Title: Rarity Score : A New Metric to Evaluate the Uncommonness of Synthesized Images
• Authors: Jiyeon Han, Hwanil Choi, Yunjey Choi, Junho Kim, Jung-Woo Ha, Jaesik Choi
• Abstract summary: We propose a new evaluation metric, called rarity score', to measure the individual rarity of each image. Code will be publicly available online for the research community.
• Score: 32.94581354719927
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Evaluation metrics in image synthesis play a key role to measure performances of generative models. However, most metrics mainly focus on image fidelity. Existing diversity metrics are derived by comparing distributions, and thus they cannot quantify the diversity or rarity degree of each generated image. In this work, we propose a new evaluation metric, called `rarity score', to measure the individual rarity of each image synthesized by generative models. We first show empirical observation that common samples are close to each other and rare samples are far from each other in nearest-neighbor distances of feature space. We then use our metric to demonstrate that the extent to which different generative models produce rare images can be effectively compared. We also propose a method to compare rarities between datasets that share the same concept such as CelebA-HQ and FFHQ. Finally, we analyze the use of metrics in different designs of feature spaces to better understand the relationship between feature spaces and resulting sparse images. Code will be publicly available online for the research community.

Related papers

• Image Similarity using An Ensemble of Context-Sensitive Models [2.9490616593440317]
  We present a more intuitive approach to build and compare image similarity models based on labelled data. We address the challenges of sparse sampling in the image space (R, A, B) and biases in the models trained with context-based data. Our testing results show that the ensemble model constructed performs 5% better than the best individual context-sensitive models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-15T20:23:05Z)
• Anomaly Score: Evaluating Generative Models and Individual Generated Images based on Complexity and Vulnerability [21.355484227864466]
  We investigate the relationship between the representation space and input space around generated images. We introduce a new metric to evaluating image-generative models called anomaly score (AS)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-17T07:33:06Z)
• DreamSim: Learning New Dimensions of Human Visual Similarity using Synthetic Data [43.247597420676044]
  Current perceptual similarity metrics operate at the level of pixels and patches. These metrics compare images in terms of their low-level colors and textures, but fail to capture mid-level similarities and differences in image layout, object pose, and semantic content. We develop a perceptual metric that assesses images holistically.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-15T17:59:50Z)
• Explicit Correspondence Matching for Generalizable Neural Radiance Fields [49.49773108695526]
  We present a new NeRF method that is able to generalize to new unseen scenarios and perform novel view synthesis with as few as two source views. The explicit correspondence matching is quantified with the cosine similarity between image features sampled at the 2D projections of a 3D point on different views. Our method achieves state-of-the-art results on different evaluation settings, with the experiments showing a strong correlation between our learned cosine feature similarity and volume density.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-24T17:46:01Z)
• Revisiting the Evaluation of Image Synthesis with GANs [55.72247435112475]
  This study presents an empirical investigation into the evaluation of synthesis performance, with generative adversarial networks (GANs) as a representative of generative models. In particular, we make in-depth analyses of various factors, including how to represent a data point in the representation space, how to calculate a fair distance using selected samples, and how many instances to use from each set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-04T17:54:32Z)
• Fake It Till You Make It: Near-Distribution Novelty Detection by Score-Based Generative Models [54.182955830194445]
  existing models either fail or face a dramatic drop under the so-called near-distribution" setting. We propose to exploit a score-based generative model to produce synthetic near-distribution anomalous data. Our method improves the near-distribution novelty detection by 6% and passes the state-of-the-art by 1% to 5% across nine novelty detection benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-28T02:02:53Z)
• Deep Relational Metric Learning [84.95793654872399]
  This paper presents a deep relational metric learning framework for image clustering and retrieval. We learn an ensemble of features that characterizes an image from different aspects to model both interclass and intraclass distributions. Experiments on the widely-used CUB-200-2011, Cars196, and Stanford Online Products datasets demonstrate that our framework improves existing deep metric learning methods and achieves very competitive results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-23T09:31:18Z)
• Random Network Distillation as a Diversity Metric for Both Image and Text Generation [62.13444904851029]
  We develop a new diversity metric that can be applied to data, both synthetic and natural, of any type. We validate and deploy this metric on both images and text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-13T22:03:52Z)
• Evaluation Metrics for Conditional Image Generation [100.69766435176557]
  We present two new metrics for evaluating generative models in the class-conditional image generation setting. A theoretical analysis shows the motivation behind each proposed metric and links the novel metrics to their unconditional counterparts. We provide an extensive empirical evaluation, comparing the metrics to their unconditional variants and to other metrics, and utilize them to analyze existing generative models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-26T12:15:16Z)
• Reliable Fidelity and Diversity Metrics for Generative Models [30.941563781926202]
  The most widely used metric for measuring the similarity between real and generated images has been the Fr'echet Inception Distance (FID) score. We show that even the latest version of the precision and recall metrics are not reliable yet. We propose density and coverage metrics that solve the above issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-23T00:50:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.