Beyond Rewards: a Hierarchical Perspective on Offline Multiagent Behavioral Analysis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.09046v1
• Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 23:07:33 GMT
• Title: Beyond Rewards: a Hierarchical Perspective on Offline Multiagent Behavioral Analysis
• Abstract summary: We introduce a model-agnostic method for discovery of behavior clusters in multiagent domains. Our framework makes no assumption about agents' underlying learning algorithms, does not require access to their latent states or models, and can be trained using entirely offline observational data.
• Score: 14.656957226255628
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Each year, expert-level performance is attained in increasingly-complex multiagent domains, notable examples including Go, Poker, and StarCraft II. This rapid progression is accompanied by a commensurate need to better understand how such agents attain this performance, to enable their safe deployment, identify limitations, and reveal potential means of improving them. In this paper we take a step back from performance-focused multiagent learning, and instead turn our attention towards agent behavior analysis. We introduce a model-agnostic method for discovery of behavior clusters in multiagent domains, using variational inference to learn a hierarchy of behaviors at the joint and local agent levels. Our framework makes no assumption about agents' underlying learning algorithms, does not require access to their latent states or models, and can be trained using entirely offline observational data. We illustrate the effectiveness of our method for enabling the coupled understanding of behaviors at the joint and local agent level, detection of behavior changepoints throughout training, discovery of core behavioral concepts (e.g., those that facilitate higher returns), and demonstrate the approach's scalability to a high-dimensional multiagent MuJoCo control domain.

Related papers

• AIPO: Learning to Reason from Active Interaction [54.10819421625103]
  AIPO enables the policy model to proactively consult three functional collaborative agents when encountering reasoning bottlenecks.<n>AIPO consistently improves reasoning performance, generalizes robustly across different policy models and RLVR algorithms, and effectively expands the reasoning capability boundary of the policy model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-08T19:06:55Z)
• Experience as a Compass: Multi-agent RAG with Evolving Orchestration and Agent Prompts [22.323342919724492]
  HERA is a hierarchical framework that jointly evolves multi-agent orchestration and role-specific agent prompts.<n> HERA achieves an average improvement of 38.69% over recent baselines.<n>Topological analyses reveal emergent self-organization, where sparse exploration yields compact, high-utility multi-agent networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-01T13:45:52Z)
• Learning to Retrieve from Agent Trajectories [72.8923565916533]
  We argue that retrieval models for agentic search should be trained directly from agent interaction data.<n>We introduce learning to retrieve from agent trajectories as a new training paradigm, where supervision is derived from multi-step agent interactions.<n>Our results highlight agent trajectories as a practical and scalable supervision source, pointing to a promising direction for retrieval in the era of agentic search.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-30T17:59:02Z)
• MAGIC-MASK: Multi-Agent Guided Inter-Agent Collaboration with Mask-Based Explainability for Reinforcement Learning [0.0]
  We propose a mathematically grounded framework, MAGIC-MASK, that extends perturbation-based explanation to Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning.<n>Our method integrates Proximal Policy Optimization, adaptive epsilon-greedy exploration, and lightweight inter-agent collaboration.<n>This collaboration enables each agent to perform saliency-guided masking and share reward-based insights with peers, reducing the time required for critical state discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-30T20:53:28Z)
• Behaviour Discovery and Attribution for Explainable Reinforcement Learning [6.123880364445758]
  Building trust in reinforcement learning (RL) agents requires understanding why they make certain decisions.<n>Existing explainability methods often focus on single states or entire trajectories.<n>We propose a fully offline, reward-free framework for behavior discovery and segmentation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-19T08:06:00Z)
• From Novice to Expert: LLM Agent Policy Optimization via Step-wise Reinforcement Learning [62.54484062185869]
  We introduce StepAgent, which utilizes step-wise reward to optimize the agent's reinforcement learning process. We propose implicit-reward and inverse reinforcement learning techniques to facilitate agent reflection and policy adjustment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-06T10:35:11Z)
• Watch Every Step! LLM Agent Learning via Iterative Step-Level Process Refinement [50.481380478458945]
  Iterative step-level Process Refinement (IPR) framework provides detailed step-by-step guidance to enhance agent training. Our experiments on three complex agent tasks demonstrate that our framework outperforms a variety of strong baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T03:29:13Z)
• On Diagnostics for Understanding Agent Training Behaviour in Cooperative MARL [5.124364759305485]
  We argue that relying solely on the empirical returns may obscure crucial insights into agent behaviour. In this paper, we explore the application of explainable AI (XAI) tools to gain profound insights into agent behaviour.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-13T19:10:10Z)
• DCIR: Dynamic Consistency Intrinsic Reward for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [84.22561239481901]
  We propose a new approach that enables agents to learn whether their behaviors should be consistent with that of other agents. We evaluate DCIR in multiple environments including Multi-agent Particle, Google Research Football and StarCraft II Micromanagement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-10T06:03:57Z)
• MERMAIDE: Learning to Align Learners using Model-Based Meta-Learning [62.065503126104126]
  We study how a principal can efficiently and effectively intervene on the rewards of a previously unseen learning agent in order to induce desirable outcomes. This is relevant to many real-world settings like auctions or taxation, where the principal may not know the learning behavior nor the rewards of real people. We introduce MERMAIDE, a model-based meta-learning framework to train a principal that can quickly adapt to out-of-distribution agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-10T15:44:50Z)
• Emergent Behaviors in Multi-Agent Target Acquisition [0.0]
  We simulate a Multi-Agent System (MAS) using Reinforcement Learning (RL) in a pursuit-evasion game. We create different adversarial scenarios by replacing RL-trained pursuers' policies with two distinct (non-RL) analytical strategies. The novelty of our approach entails the creation of an influential feature set that reveals underlying data regularities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-15T15:20:58Z)
• Learning From Good Trajectories in Offline Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [98.07495732562654]
  offline multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) aims to learn effective multi-agent policies from pre-collected datasets. One agent learned by offline MARL often inherits this random policy, jeopardizing the performance of the entire team. We propose a novel framework called Shared Individual Trajectories (SIT) to address this problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-28T18:11:26Z)
• Explaining Reinforcement Learning Policies through Counterfactual Trajectories [147.7246109100945]
  A human developer must validate that an RL agent will perform well at test-time. Our method conveys how the agent performs under distribution shifts by showing the agent's behavior across a wider trajectory distribution. In a user study, we demonstrate that our method enables users to score better than baseline methods on one of two agent validation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-29T00:52:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.