On Diagnostics for Understanding Agent Training Behaviour in Cooperative MARL

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.08468v1
• Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 19:10:10 GMT
• Title: On Diagnostics for Understanding Agent Training Behaviour in Cooperative MARL
• Authors: Wiem Khlifi, Siddarth Singh, Omayma Mahjoub, Ruan de Kock, Abidine Vall, Rihab Gorsane and Arnu Pretorius
• Abstract summary: We argue that relying solely on the empirical returns may obscure crucial insights into agent behaviour. In this paper, we explore the application of explainable AI (XAI) tools to gain profound insights into agent behaviour.
• Score: 5.124364759305485
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) has made substantial strides in addressing the distributed decision-making challenges. However, as multi-agent systems grow in complexity, gaining a comprehensive understanding of their behaviour becomes increasingly challenging. Conventionally, tracking team rewards over time has served as a pragmatic measure to gauge the effectiveness of agents in learning optimal policies. Nevertheless, we argue that relying solely on the empirical returns may obscure crucial insights into agent behaviour. In this paper, we explore the application of explainable AI (XAI) tools to gain profound insights into agent behaviour. We employ these diagnostics tools within the context of Level-Based Foraging and Multi-Robot Warehouse environments and apply them to a diverse array of MARL algorithms. We demonstrate how our diagnostics can enhance the interpretability and explainability of MARL systems, providing a better understanding of agent behaviour.

Related papers

• From Novice to Expert: LLM Agent Policy Optimization via Step-wise Reinforcement Learning [62.54484062185869]
  We introduce StepAgent, which utilizes step-wise reward to optimize the agent's reinforcement learning process. We propose implicit-reward and inverse reinforcement learning techniques to facilitate agent reflection and policy adjustment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-06T10:35:11Z)
• Watch Every Step! LLM Agent Learning via Iterative Step-Level Process Refinement [50.481380478458945]
  Iterative step-level Process Refinement (IPR) framework provides detailed step-by-step guidance to enhance agent training. Our experiments on three complex agent tasks demonstrate that our framework outperforms a variety of strong baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T03:29:13Z)
• Towards Generalizable Agents in Text-Based Educational Environments: A Study of Integrating RL with LLMs [22.568925103893182]
  We aim to enhance the generalization capabilities of agents in open-ended text-based learning environments by integrating Reinforcement Learning (RL) with Large Language Models (LLMs) We introduce PharmaSimText, a novel benchmark derived from the PharmaSim virtual pharmacy environment designed for practicing diagnostic conversations. Our results show that RL-based agents excel in task completion but lack in asking quality diagnostic questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-29T14:53:48Z)
• AgentBoard: An Analytical Evaluation Board of Multi-turn LLM Agents [76.95062553043607]
  evaluating large language models (LLMs) is essential for understanding their capabilities and facilitating their integration into practical applications. We introduce AgentBoard, a pioneering comprehensive benchmark and accompanied open-source evaluation framework tailored to analytical evaluation of LLM agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-24T01:51:00Z)
• Learning Reward Machines in Cooperative Multi-Agent Tasks [75.79805204646428]
  This paper presents a novel approach to Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) It combines cooperative task decomposition with the learning of reward machines (RMs) encoding the structure of the sub-tasks. The proposed method helps deal with the non-Markovian nature of the rewards in partially observable environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-24T15:12:28Z)
• Beyond Rewards: a Hierarchical Perspective on Offline Multiagent Behavioral Analysis [14.656957226255628]
  We introduce a model-agnostic method for discovery of behavior clusters in multiagent domains. Our framework makes no assumption about agents' underlying learning algorithms, does not require access to their latent states or models, and can be trained using entirely offline observational data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-17T23:07:33Z)
• Policy Diagnosis via Measuring Role Diversity in Cooperative Multi-agent RL [107.58821842920393]
  We quantify the agent's behavior difference and build its relationship with the policy performance via bf Role Diversity We find that the error bound in MARL can be decomposed into three parts that have a strong relation to the role diversity. The decomposed factors can significantly impact policy optimization on three popular directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-01T04:58:52Z)
• Toward Policy Explanations for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [18.33682005623418]
  We present novel methods to generate two types of policy explanations for MARL. Experimental results on three MARL domains demonstrate the scalability of our methods. A user study shows that the generated explanations significantly improve user performance and increase subjective ratings on metrics such as user satisfaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-26T20:07:08Z)
• KnowSR: Knowledge Sharing among Homogeneous Agents in Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning [16.167201058368303]
  We present an adaptation method of the majority of multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) algorithms called KnowSR. We employ the idea of knowledge distillation (KD) to share knowledge among agents to shorten the training phase. To empirically demonstrate the robustness and effectiveness of KnowSR, we performed extensive experiments on state-of-the-art MARL algorithms in collaborative and competitive scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-25T02:19:41Z)
• What is Going on Inside Recurrent Meta Reinforcement Learning Agents? [63.58053355357644]
  Recurrent meta reinforcement learning (meta-RL) agents are agents that employ a recurrent neural network (RNN) for the purpose of "learning a learning algorithm" We shed light on the internal working mechanisms of these agents by reformulating the meta-RL problem using the Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP) framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-29T20:34:39Z)
• Agent-Centric Representations for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [12.577354830985012]
  We investigate whether object-centric representations are also beneficial in the fully cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning setting. Specifically, we study two ways of incorporating an agent-centric inductive bias into our RL algorithm. We evaluate these approaches on the Google Research Football environment as well as DeepMind Lab 2D.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-19T15:43:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.