Short Video Uprising: How #BlackLivesMatter Content on TikTok Challenges
the Protest Paradigm
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.09946v1
- Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 18:05:07 GMT
- Title: Short Video Uprising: How #BlackLivesMatter Content on TikTok Challenges
the Protest Paradigm
- Authors: Yanru Jiang, Xin Jin, Qinhao Deng
- Abstract summary: This study uses TikTok to examine how short-form video platforms challenge the protest paradigm in the recent Black Lives Matter movement.
A computer-mediated visual analysis, computer vision, is employed to identify the presence of four visual frames of protest (riot, confrontation, spectacle, and debate) in multimedia content.
Results indicate that the three delegitimizing frames are rarely found on TikTok, whereas the debate frame, that empowers marginalized communities, dominates the public sphere.
- Score: 8.355120759446965
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: This study uses TikTok (N = 8,173) to examine how short-form video platforms
challenge the protest paradigm in the recent Black Lives Matter movement. A
computer-mediated visual analysis, computer vision, is employed to identify the
presence of four visual frames of protest (riot, confrontation, spectacle, and
debate) in multimedia content. Results of descriptive statistics and the t-test
indicate that the three delegitimizing frames - riot, confrontation, and
spectacle - are rarely found on TikTok, whereas the debate frame, that empowers
marginalized communities, dominates the public sphere. However, although the
three delegitimizing frames receive lower social media visibility, as measured
by views, likes, shares, followers, and durations, legitimizing elements, such
as the debate frame, minority identities, and unofficial sources, are not
generally favored by TikTok audiences. This study concludes that while
short-form video platforms could potentially challenge the protest paradigm on
the content creators' side, the audiences' preference as measured by social
media visibility might still be moderately associated with the protest
paradigm.
Related papers
- An Investigation into Protestware [3.236198583140341]
Protestware is software that can be used to organize protests.
Recent events in the Russo-Ukrainian war has sparked a new wave of protestware.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-30T01:17:16Z) - Conspiracy theories and where to find them on TikTok [3.424635462664968]
Concerns have been raised about the potential of TikTok to promote and amplify online harmful and dangerous content.
Our study analyzes the presence of videos promoting conspiracy theories, providing a lower-bound estimate of their prevalence.
We evaluate the capabilities of state-of-the-art open Large Language Models to identify conspiracy theories after extracting audio transcriptions of videos.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-17T13:28:11Z) - Television Discourse Decoded: Comprehensive Multimodal Analytics at Scale [5.965160962617209]
We tackle the complex task of analyzing televised debates, with a focus on a prime time news debate show from India.
Previous methods, which often relied solely on text, fall short in capturing the multimodal essence of these debates.
We introduce a comprehensive automated toolkit that employs advanced computer vision and speech-to-text techniques for large-scale multimedia analysis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-20T01:20:31Z) - Lexical Squad@Multimodal Hate Speech Event Detection 2023: Multimodal
Hate Speech Detection using Fused Ensemble Approach [0.23020018305241333]
We present our novel ensemble learning approach for detecting hate speech, by classifying text-embedded images into two labels, namely "Hate Speech" and "No Hate Speech"
Our proposed ensemble model yielded promising results with 75.21 and 74.96 as accuracy and F-1 score (respectively)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-23T12:06:05Z) - Understanding Divergent Framing of the Supreme Court Controversies:
Social Media vs. News Outlets [56.67097829383139]
We focus on the nuanced distinctions in framing of social media and traditional media outlets concerning a series of U.S. Supreme Court rulings.
We observe significant polarization in the news media's treatment of affirmative action and abortion rights, whereas the topic of student loans tends to exhibit a greater degree of consensus.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-18T06:40:21Z) - Countering Malicious Content Moderation Evasion in Online Social
Networks: Simulation and Detection of Word Camouflage [64.78260098263489]
Twisting and camouflaging keywords are among the most used techniques to evade platform content moderation systems.
This article contributes significantly to countering malicious information by developing multilingual tools to simulate and detect new methods of evasion of content.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-27T16:08:49Z) - What Truly Matters? Using Linguistic Cues for Analyzing the
#BlackLivesMatter Movement and its Counter Protests: 2013 to 2020 [31.670509436139735]
There has been a significant increase in digital activism addressing police-brutality related and racially-motivated incidents in the U.S.
We use social media as an authoritative tool to examine and analyze the linguistic cues and thematic relationships in these three mediums.
Our results show that excessive use of racially-related or prejudicial hashtags were used by the counter protests which portray potential discriminatory tendencies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-20T18:34:30Z) - News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation.
Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content.
The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z) - Content-based Analysis of the Cultural Differences between TikTok and
Douyin [95.32409577885645]
Short-form video social media shifts away from the traditional media paradigm by telling the audience a dynamic story to attract their attention.
In particular, different combinations of everyday objects can be employed to represent a unique scene that is both interesting and understandable.
Offered by the same company, TikTok and Douyin are popular examples of such new media that has become popular in recent years.
The hypothesis that they express cultural differences together with media fashion and social idiosyncrasy is the primary target of our research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-03T01:47:49Z) - Unified Multisensory Perception: Weakly-Supervised Audio-Visual Video
Parsing [48.87278703876147]
A new problem, named audio-visual video parsing, aims to parse a video into temporal event segments and label them as audible, visible, or both.
We propose a novel hybrid attention network to explore unimodal and cross-modal temporal contexts simultaneously.
Experimental results show that the challenging audio-visual video parsing can be achieved even with only video-level weak labels.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-21T01:53:31Z) - Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms.
We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features.
We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.