Conspiracy theories and where to find them on TikTok
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.12545v1
- Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 13:28:11 GMT
- Title: Conspiracy theories and where to find them on TikTok
- Authors: Francesco Corso, Francesco Pierri, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales,
- Abstract summary: Concerns have been raised about the potential of TikTok to promote and amplify online harmful and dangerous content.
Our study analyzes the presence of videos promoting conspiracy theories, providing a lower-bound estimate of their prevalence.
We evaluate the capabilities of state-of-the-art open Large Language Models to identify conspiracy theories after extracting audio transcriptions of videos.
- Score: 3.424635462664968
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: TikTok has skyrocketed in popularity over recent years, especially among younger audiences, thanks to its viral trends and social challenges. However, concerns have been raised about the potential of this platform to promote and amplify online harmful and dangerous content. Leveraging the official TikTok Research API and collecting a longitudinal dataset of 1.5M videos shared in the US over a period of 3 years, our study analyzes the presence of videos promoting conspiracy theories, providing a lower-bound estimate of their prevalence (approximately 0.1% of all videos) and assessing the effects of the new Creator Program, which provides new ways for creators to monetize, on the supply of conspiratorial content. We evaluate the capabilities of state-of-the-art open Large Language Models to identify conspiracy theories after extracting audio transcriptions of videos, finding that they can detect harmful content with high precision but with overall performance comparable to fine-tuned traditional language models such as RoBERTa. Our findings are instrumental for content moderation strategies that aim to understand and mitigate the spread of harmful content on rapidly evolving social media platforms like TikTok.
Related papers
- What we can learn from TikTok through its Research API [3.424635462664968]
The recent release of a free Research API opens the door to collecting data on posted videos, associated comments, and user activities.
Our study focuses on evaluating the reliability of the results returned by the Research API, by collecting and analyzing a random sample of TikTok videos posted in a span of 6 years.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-21T14:59:49Z) - Shifting Climates: Climate Change Communication from YouTube to TikTok [0.0]
We studied the video content produced by 21 prominent YouTube creators who have expanded their influence to TikTok as information disseminators.
We found that creators use a more emotionally resonant, self-referential, and action-oriented language compared to YouTube.
We also observed a strong semantic alignment between videos and comments, with creators who excel at diversifying their TikTok content from YouTube typically receiving responses that more closely align with their produced content.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-08T11:10:10Z) - The Conspiracy Money Machine: Uncovering Telegram's Conspiracy Channels
and their Profit Model [53.83179030955546]
We find that Telegram is a perfect breeding ground for a complex ecosystem of conspiracy channels.
Conspiracy channels can be clustered into four distinct communities comprising over 17,000 channels.
We uncover the "Conspiracy Money Machine," revealing how most conspiracy channels actively seek to profit from their subscribers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-24T16:25:52Z) - An Image is Worth a Thousand Toxic Words: A Metamorphic Testing
Framework for Content Moderation Software [64.367830425115]
Social media platforms are being increasingly misused to spread toxic content, including hate speech, malicious advertising, and pornography.
Despite tremendous efforts in developing and deploying content moderation methods, malicious users can evade moderation by embedding texts into images.
We propose a metamorphic testing framework for content moderation software.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-18T20:33:06Z) - Fighting Malicious Media Data: A Survey on Tampering Detection and
Deepfake Detection [115.83992775004043]
Recent advances in deep learning, particularly deep generative models, open the doors for producing perceptually convincing images and videos at a low cost.
This paper provides a comprehensive review of the current media tampering detection approaches, and discusses the challenges and trends in this field for future research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-12T02:54:08Z) - Misinformation Detection in Social Media Video Posts [0.4724825031148411]
Short-form video by social media platforms has become a critical challenge for social media providers.
We develop methods to detect misinformation in social media posts, exploiting modalities such as video and text.
We collect 160,000 video posts from Twitter, and leverage self-supervised learning to learn expressive representations of joint visual and textual data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-15T20:14:54Z) - An Empirical Investigation of Personalization Factors on TikTok [77.34726150561087]
Despite the importance of TikTok's algorithm to the platform's success and content distribution, little work has been done on the empirical analysis of the algorithm.
Using a sock-puppet audit methodology with a custom algorithm developed by us, we tested and analysed the effect of the language and location used to access TikTok.
We identify that the follow-feature has the strongest influence, followed by the like-feature and video view rate.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-28T17:40:00Z) - Slapping Cats, Bopping Heads, and Oreo Shakes: Understanding Indicators
of Virality in TikTok Short Videos [11.089339341624996]
We study what elements of short videos posted on TikTok contribute to their virality.
Our research highlights the characteristics that distinguish viral from non-viral TikTok videos.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-03T18:17:16Z) - News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation.
Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content.
The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z) - Content-based Analysis of the Cultural Differences between TikTok and
Douyin [95.32409577885645]
Short-form video social media shifts away from the traditional media paradigm by telling the audience a dynamic story to attract their attention.
In particular, different combinations of everyday objects can be employed to represent a unique scene that is both interesting and understandable.
Offered by the same company, TikTok and Douyin are popular examples of such new media that has become popular in recent years.
The hypothesis that they express cultural differences together with media fashion and social idiosyncrasy is the primary target of our research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-03T01:47:49Z) - A Longitudinal Analysis of YouTube's Promotion of Conspiracy Videos [14.867862489411868]
Conspiracy theories have flourished on social media, raising concerns that such content is fueling the spread of disinformation, supporting extremist ideologies, and in some cases, leading to violence.
Under increased scrutiny and pressure from legislators and the public, YouTube announced efforts to change their recommendation algorithms so that the most egregious conspiracy videos are demoted and demonetized.
We have developed a classifier for automatically determining if a video is conspiratorial.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-06T17:31:30Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.