Safe reinforcement learning for multi-energy management systems with known constraint functions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.03830v1
• Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2022 11:33:53 GMT
• Title: Safe reinforcement learning for multi-energy management systems with known constraint functions
• Authors: Glenn Ceusters, Luis Ramirez Camargo, R\"udiger Franke, Ann Now\'e, Maarten Messagie
• Abstract summary: Reinforcement learning (RL) is a promising optimal control technique for multi-energy management systems. We present two novel safe RL methods, namely SafeFallback and GiveSafe. In a simulated multi-energy systems case study we have shown that both methods start with a significantly higher utility.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) is a promising optimal control technique for multi-energy management systems. It does not require a model a priori - reducing the upfront and ongoing project-specific engineering effort and is capable of learning better representations of the underlying system dynamics. However, vanilla RL does not provide constraint satisfaction guarantees - resulting in various unsafe interactions within its safety-critical environment. In this paper, we present two novel safe RL methods, namely SafeFallback and GiveSafe, where the safety constraint formulation is decoupled from the RL formulation and which provides hard-constraint satisfaction guarantees both during training (exploration) and exploitation of the (close-to) optimal policy. In a simulated multi-energy systems case study we have shown that both methods start with a significantly higher utility (i.e. useful policy) compared to a vanilla RL benchmark (94,6% and 82,8% compared to 35,5%) and that the proposed SafeFallback method even can outperform the vanilla RL benchmark (102,9% to 100%). We conclude that both methods are viably safety constraint handling techniques capable beyond RL, as demonstrated with random agents while still providing hard-constraint guarantees. Finally, we propose fundamental future work to i.a. improve the constraint functions itself as more data becomes available.

Related papers

• ActSafe: Active Exploration with Safety Constraints for Reinforcement Learning [48.536695794883826]
  We present ActSafe, a novel model-based RL algorithm for safe and efficient exploration. We show that ActSafe guarantees safety during learning while also obtaining a near-optimal policy in finite time. In addition, we propose a practical variant of ActSafe that builds on latest model-based RL advancements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-12T10:46:02Z)
• Sampling-based Safe Reinforcement Learning for Nonlinear Dynamical Systems [15.863561935347692]
  We develop provably safe and convergent reinforcement learning algorithms for control of nonlinear dynamical systems. Recent advances at the intersection of control and RL follow a two-stage, safety filter approach to enforcing hard safety constraints. We develop a single-stage, sampling-based approach to hard constraint satisfaction that learns RL controllers enjoying classical convergence guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-06T19:39:20Z)
• Safety Optimized Reinforcement Learning via Multi-Objective Policy Optimization [3.425378723819911]
  Safe reinforcement learning (Safe RL) refers to a class of techniques that aim to prevent RL algorithms from violating constraints. In this paper, a novel model-free Safe RL algorithm, formulated based on the multi-objective policy optimization framework is introduced.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-23T08:58:38Z)
• Approximate Model-Based Shielding for Safe Reinforcement Learning [83.55437924143615]
  We propose a principled look-ahead shielding algorithm for verifying the performance of learned RL policies. Our algorithm differs from other shielding approaches in that it does not require prior knowledge of the safety-relevant dynamics of the system. We demonstrate superior performance to other safety-aware approaches on a set of Atari games with state-dependent safety-labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-27T15:19:45Z)
• A Multiplicative Value Function for Safe and Efficient Reinforcement Learning [131.96501469927733]
  We propose a safe model-free RL algorithm with a novel multiplicative value function consisting of a safety critic and a reward critic. The safety critic predicts the probability of constraint violation and discounts the reward critic that only estimates constraint-free returns. We evaluate our method in four safety-focused environments, including classical RL benchmarks augmented with safety constraints and robot navigation tasks with images and raw Lidar scans as observations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-07T18:29:15Z)
• Safety Correction from Baseline: Towards the Risk-aware Policy in Robotics via Dual-agent Reinforcement Learning [64.11013095004786]
  We propose a dual-agent safe reinforcement learning strategy consisting of a baseline and a safe agent. Such a decoupled framework enables high flexibility, data efficiency and risk-awareness for RL-based control. The proposed method outperforms the state-of-the-art safe RL algorithms on difficult robot locomotion and manipulation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-14T03:11:25Z)
• Evaluating Model-free Reinforcement Learning toward Safety-critical Tasks [70.76757529955577]
  This paper revisits prior work in this scope from the perspective of state-wise safe RL. We propose Unrolling Safety Layer (USL), a joint method that combines safety optimization and safety projection. To facilitate further research in this area, we reproduce related algorithms in a unified pipeline and incorporate them into SafeRL-Kit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-12T06:30:17Z)
• Safe Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with an Uncertainty-Aware Reachability Certificate [6.581362609037603]
  We build a safe reinforcement learning framework to resolve constraints required by the DRC and its corresponding shield policy. We also devise a line search method to maintain safety and reach higher returns simultaneously while leveraging the shield policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T06:16:53Z)
• Safe Reinforcement Learning via Confidence-Based Filters [78.39359694273575]
  We develop a control-theoretic approach for certifying state safety constraints for nominal policies learned via standard reinforcement learning techniques. We provide formal safety guarantees, and empirically demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-04T11:43:23Z)
• Provably Safe Reinforcement Learning: Conceptual Analysis, Survey, and Benchmarking [12.719948223824483]
  reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms are crucial to unlock their potential for many real-world tasks. However, vanilla RL and most safe RL approaches do not guarantee safety. We introduce a categorization of existing provably safe RL methods, present the conceptual foundations for both continuous and discrete action spaces, and empirically benchmark existing methods. We provide practical guidance on selecting provably safe RL approaches depending on the safety specification, RL algorithm, and type of action space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-13T16:34:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.