Multimodal Multi-objective Optimization: Comparative Study of the
State-of-the-Art
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.04730v1
- Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 09:21:06 GMT
- Title: Multimodal Multi-objective Optimization: Comparative Study of the
State-of-the-Art
- Authors: Wenhua Li, Tao Zhang, Rui Wang, Jing Liang
- Abstract summary: Multimodal multi-objective problems (MMOPs) arise in real-world problems where distant solutions in decision space correspond to very similar objective values.
To obtain all solutions for MMOPs, many multimodal multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MMEAs) have been proposed.
- Score: 9.815900424538613
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Multimodal multi-objective problems (MMOPs) commonly arise in real-world
problems where distant solutions in decision space correspond to very similar
objective values. To obtain all solutions for MMOPs, many multimodal
multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MMEAs) have been proposed. For now,
few studies have encompassed most of the recently proposed representative MMEAs
and made a comparative comparison. In this study, we first review the related
works during the last two decades. Then, we choose 12 state-of-the-art
algorithms that utilize different diversity-maintaining techniques and compared
their performance on existing test suites. Experimental results indicate the
strengths and weaknesses of different techniques on different types of MMOPs,
thus providing guidance on how to select/design MMEAs in specific scenarios.
Related papers
- Progressive Multimodal Reasoning via Active Retrieval [64.74746997923967]
Multi-step multimodal reasoning tasks pose significant challenges for large language models (MLLMs)
We propose AR-MCTS, a universal framework designed to progressively improve the reasoning capabilities of MLLMs.
We show that AR-MCTS can optimize sampling diversity and accuracy, yielding reliable multimodal reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-19T13:25:39Z) - A Performance Investigation of Multimodal Multiobjective Optimization Algorithms in Solving Two Types of Real-World Problems [11.276725259527005]
Two types of real-world multimodal multiobjective optimization problems in feature selection and location selection are formulated.
An investigation is conducted to evaluate the performance of seven existing MMOAs in solving these two types of real-world problems.
An analysis of the experimental results explores the characteristics of the tested MMOAs, providing insights for selecting suitable MMOAs in real-world applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-04T04:02:53Z) - MMMU-Pro: A More Robust Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding Benchmark [77.93283927871758]
This paper introduces MMMU-Pro, a robust version of the Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning benchmark.
MMMU-Pro rigorously assesses multimodal models' true understanding and reasoning capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-04T15:31:26Z) - Large Multimodal Agents: A Survey [78.81459893884737]
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved superior performance in powering text-based AI agents.
There is an emerging research trend focused on extending these LLM-powered AI agents into the multimodal domain.
This review aims to provide valuable insights and guidelines for future research in this rapidly evolving field.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-23T06:04:23Z) - Towards Multi-Objective High-Dimensional Feature Selection via
Evolutionary Multitasking [63.91518180604101]
This paper develops a novel EMT framework for high-dimensional feature selection problems, namely MO-FSEMT.
A task-specific knowledge transfer mechanism is designed to leverage the advantage information of each task, enabling the discovery and effective transmission of high-quality solutions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-03T06:34:39Z) - MM-BigBench: Evaluating Multimodal Models on Multimodal Content
Comprehension Tasks [56.60050181186531]
We introduce MM-BigBench, which incorporates a diverse range of metrics to offer an extensive evaluation of the performance of various models and instructions.
Our paper evaluates a total of 20 language models (14 MLLMs) on 14 multimodal datasets spanning 6 tasks, with 10 instructions for each task, and derives novel insights.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-13T11:57:04Z) - Hybridization of evolutionary algorithm and deep reinforcement learning
for multi-objective orienteering optimization [16.23652137705642]
Multi-objective orienteering problems (MO-OPs) are classical multi-objective routing problems.
This study seeks to solve MO-OPs through a problem-decomposition framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-21T15:20:42Z) - Niching Diversity Estimation for Multi-modal Multi-objective
Optimization [9.584279193016522]
Niching is an important and widely used technique in evolutionary multi-objective optimization.
In MMOPs, a solution in the objective space may have multiple inverse images in the decision space, which are termed as equivalent solutions.
A general niching mechanism is proposed to make standard diversity estimators more efficient when handling MMOPs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-31T05:23:31Z) - Decomposition in Decision and Objective Space for Multi-Modal
Multi-Objective Optimization [15.681236469530397]
Multi-modal multi-objective optimization problems (MMMOPs) have multiple subsets within the Pareto-optimal Set.
Prevalent multi-objective evolutionary algorithms are not purely designed to search for multiple solution subsets, whereas, algorithms designed for MMMOPs demonstrate degraded performance in the objective space.
This motivates the design of better algorithms for addressing MMMOPs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-04T03:18:47Z) - Hybrid Adaptive Evolutionary Algorithm for Multi-objective Optimization [0.0]
This paper proposed a new Multi-objective Algorithm as an extension of the Hybrid Adaptive Evolutionary algorithm (HAEA) called MoHAEA.
MoHAEA is compared with four states of the art MOEAs, namely MOEA/D, pa$lambda$-MOEA/D, MOEA/D-AWA, and NSGA-II.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-29T02:16:49Z) - Pareto Multi-Task Learning [53.90732663046125]
Multi-task learning is a powerful method for solving multiple correlated tasks simultaneously.
It is often impossible to find one single solution to optimize all the tasks, since different tasks might conflict with each other.
Recently, a novel method is proposed to find one single Pareto optimal solution with good trade-off among different tasks by casting multi-task learning as multiobjective optimization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2019-12-30T08:58:40Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.