MMMU-Pro: A More Robust Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding Benchmark

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.02813v2
• Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 12:55:31 GMT
• Title: MMMU-Pro: A More Robust Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding Benchmark
• Authors: Xiang Yue, Tianyu Zheng, Yuansheng Ni, Yubo Wang, Kai Zhang, Shengbang Tong, Yuxuan Sun, Botao Yu, Ge Zhang, Huan Sun, Yu Su, Wenhu Chen, Graham Neubig,
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces MMMU-Pro, a robust version of the Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning benchmark. MMMU-Pro rigorously assesses multimodal models' true understanding and reasoning capabilities.
• Score: 77.93283927871758
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This paper introduces MMMU-Pro, a robust version of the Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning (MMMU) benchmark. MMMU-Pro rigorously assesses multimodal models' true understanding and reasoning capabilities through a three-step process based on MMMU: (1) filtering out questions answerable by text-only models, (2) augmenting candidate options, and (3) introducing a vision-only input setting where questions are embedded within images. This setting challenges AI to truly "see" and "read" simultaneously, testing a fundamental human cognitive skill of seamlessly integrating visual and textual information. Results show that model performance is substantially lower on MMMU-Pro than on MMMU, ranging from 16.8% to 26.9% across models. We explore the impact of OCR prompts and Chain of Thought (CoT) reasoning, finding that OCR prompts have minimal effect while CoT generally improves performance. MMMU-Pro provides a more rigorous evaluation tool, closely mimicking real-world scenarios and offering valuable directions for future research in multimodal AI.

Related papers

• MME-CoT: Benchmarking Chain-of-Thought in Large Multimodal Models for Reasoning Quality, Robustness, and Efficiency [63.23935582919081]
  Chain-of-Thought (CoT) has significantly enhanced the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) We introduce MME-CoT, a specialized benchmark evaluating the CoT reasoning performance of LMMs. We conduct an in-depth analysis of state-of-the-art LMMs, uncovering several key insights.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-13T18:59:46Z)
• Can MLLMs Reason in Multimodality? EMMA: An Enhanced MultiModal ReAsoning Benchmark [73.27104042215207]
  We introduce EMMA, a benchmark targeting organic multimodal reasoning across mathematics, physics, chemistry, and coding. EMMA tasks demand advanced cross-modal reasoning that cannot be addressed by reasoning independently in each modality. Our evaluation of state-of-the-art MLLMs on EMMA reveals significant limitations in handling complex multimodal and multi-step reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-09T18:55:52Z)
• Progressive Multimodal Reasoning via Active Retrieval [64.74746997923967]
  Multi-step multimodal reasoning tasks pose significant challenges for large language models (MLLMs) We propose AR-MCTS, a universal framework designed to progressively improve the reasoning capabilities of MLLMs. We show that AR-MCTS can optimize sampling diversity and accuracy, yielding reliable multimodal reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T13:25:39Z)
• MMEvalPro: Calibrating Multimodal Benchmarks Towards Trustworthy and Efficient Evaluation [38.076276626337766]
  MMEvalPro is a benchmark designed to avoid Type-I errors through a trilogy evaluation pipeline and more rigorous metrics. MMEvalPro comprises $2,138$ question triplets, totaling $6,414$ distinct questions. Compared with the existing benchmarks, our experiments with the latest LLMs and LMMs demonstrate that MMEvalPro is more challenging.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-29T15:28:45Z)
• MM-Vet: Evaluating Large Multimodal Models for Integrated Capabilities [153.37868034779385]
  We propose MM-Vet, an evaluation benchmark that examines large multimodal models (LMMs) on complicated multimodal tasks. Recent LMMs have shown various intriguing abilities, such as solving math problems written on the blackboard, reasoning about events and celebrities in news images, and explaining visual jokes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-04T17:59:47Z)
• DUMA: Reading Comprehension with Transposition Thinking [107.89721765056281]
  Multi-choice Machine Reading (MRC) requires model to decide the correct answer from a set of answer options when given a passage and a question. New DUal Multi-head Co-Attention (DUMA) model is inspired by human's transposition thinking process solving the multi-choice MRC problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-26T07:35:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.