Benign, Tempered, or Catastrophic: A Taxonomy of Overfitting

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.06569v3
• Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 21:54:26 GMT
• Title: Benign, Tempered, or Catastrophic: A Taxonomy of Overfitting
• Authors: Neil Mallinar, James B. Simon, Amirhesam Abedsoltan, Parthe Pandit, Mikhail Belkin, Preetum Nakkiran,
• Abstract summary: Some interpolating methods, including neural networks, can fit noisy training data without catastrophically bad test performance. We argue that real interpolating methods like neural networks do not fit benignly.
• Score: 19.08269066145619
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The practical success of overparameterized neural networks has motivated the recent scientific study of interpolating methods, which perfectly fit their training data. Certain interpolating methods, including neural networks, can fit noisy training data without catastrophically bad test performance, in defiance of standard intuitions from statistical learning theory. Aiming to explain this, a body of recent work has studied benign overfitting, a phenomenon where some interpolating methods approach Bayes optimality, even in the presence of noise. In this work we argue that while benign overfitting has been instructive and fruitful to study, many real interpolating methods like neural networks do not fit benignly: modest noise in the training set causes nonzero (but non-infinite) excess risk at test time, implying these models are neither benign nor catastrophic but rather fall in an intermediate regime. We call this intermediate regime tempered overfitting, and we initiate its systematic study. We first explore this phenomenon in the context of kernel (ridge) regression (KR) by obtaining conditions on the ridge parameter and kernel eigenspectrum under which KR exhibits each of the three behaviors. We find that kernels with powerlaw spectra, including Laplace kernels and ReLU neural tangent kernels, exhibit tempered overfitting. We then empirically study deep neural networks through the lens of our taxonomy, and find that those trained to interpolation are tempered, while those stopped early are benign. We hope our work leads to a more refined understanding of overfitting in modern learning.

Related papers

• On the Asymptotic Learning Curves of Kernel Ridge Regression under Power-law Decay [17.306230523610864]
  We show that the 'benign overfitting phenomenon' exists in very wide neural networks only when the noise level is small. Our results suggest that the phenomenon exists in very wide neural networks only when the noise level is small.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-23T11:18:13Z)
• Benign Overfitting in Deep Neural Networks under Lazy Training [72.28294823115502]
  We show that when the data distribution is well-separated, DNNs can achieve Bayes-optimal test error for classification. Our results indicate that interpolating with smoother functions leads to better generalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-30T19:37:44Z)
• Mind the spikes: Benign overfitting of kernels and neural networks in fixed dimension [17.96183484063563]
  We show that the smoothness of the estimators, and not the dimension, is the key to benign overfitting. We translate our results to wide neural networks. Our experiments verify that such neural networks, while overfitting, can indeed generalize well even on low-dimensional data sets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T13:56:29Z)
• Benign Overfitting for Two-layer ReLU Convolutional Neural Networks [60.19739010031304]
  We establish algorithm-dependent risk bounds for learning two-layer ReLU convolutional neural networks with label-flipping noise. We show that, under mild conditions, the neural network trained by gradient descent can achieve near-zero training loss and Bayes optimal test risk.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-07T18:59:38Z)
• Benign Overfitting in Two-layer Convolutional Neural Networks [90.75603889605043]
  We study the benign overfitting phenomenon in training a two-layer convolutional neural network (CNN) We show that when the signal-to-noise ratio satisfies a certain condition, a two-layer CNN trained by gradient descent can achieve arbitrarily small training and test loss. On the other hand, when this condition does not hold, overfitting becomes harmful and the obtained CNN can only achieve constant level test loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-14T07:45:51Z)
• Attribute-Guided Adversarial Training for Robustness to Natural Perturbations [64.35805267250682]
  We propose an adversarial training approach which learns to generate new samples so as to maximize exposure of the classifier to the attributes-space. Our approach enables deep neural networks to be robust against a wide range of naturally occurring perturbations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-03T10:17:30Z)
• Feature Purification: How Adversarial Training Performs Robust Deep Learning [66.05472746340142]
  We show a principle that we call Feature Purification, where we show one of the causes of the existence of adversarial examples is the accumulation of certain small dense mixtures in the hidden weights during the training process of a neural network. We present both experiments on the CIFAR-10 dataset to illustrate this principle, and a theoretical result proving that for certain natural classification tasks, training a two-layer neural network with ReLU activation using randomly gradient descent indeed this principle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-20T16:56:08Z)
• A Generalized Neural Tangent Kernel Analysis for Two-layer Neural Networks [87.23360438947114]
  We show that noisy gradient descent with weight decay can still exhibit a " Kernel-like" behavior. This implies that the training loss converges linearly up to a certain accuracy. We also establish a novel generalization error bound for two-layer neural networks trained by noisy gradient descent with weight decay.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-10T18:56:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.