Nonmyopic Distilled Data Association Belief Space Planning Under Budget
Constraints
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.08096v1
- Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2022 07:07:47 GMT
- Title: Nonmyopic Distilled Data Association Belief Space Planning Under Budget
Constraints
- Authors: Moshe Shienman and Vadim Indelman
- Abstract summary: We present a method to solve the nonmyopic Belief Space Planning problem while reasoning about data association.
We rigorously analyze the effects of budget constraints in both inference and planning.
- Score: 6.62472687864754
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Autonomous agents operating in perceptually aliased environments should
ideally be able to solve the data association problem. Yet, planning for future
actions while considering this problem is not trivial. State of the art
approaches therefore use multi-modal hypotheses to represent the states of the
agent and of the environment. However, explicitly considering all possible data
associations, the number of hypotheses grows exponentially with the planning
horizon. As such, the corresponding Belief Space Planning problem quickly
becomes unsolvable. Moreover, under hard computational budget constraints, some
non-negligible hypotheses must eventually be pruned in both planning and
inference. Nevertheless, the two processes are generally treated separately and
the effect of budget constraints in one process over the other was barely
studied. We present a computationally efficient method to solve the nonmyopic
Belief Space Planning problem while reasoning about data association. Moreover,
we rigorously analyze the effects of budget constraints in both inference and
planning.
Related papers
- OTClean: Data Cleaning for Conditional Independence Violations using
Optimal Transport [51.6416022358349]
sys is a framework that harnesses optimal transport theory for data repair under Conditional Independence (CI) constraints.
We develop an iterative algorithm inspired by Sinkhorn's matrix scaling algorithm, which efficiently addresses high-dimensional and large-scale data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-04T18:23:55Z) - Planning as In-Painting: A Diffusion-Based Embodied Task Planning
Framework for Environments under Uncertainty [56.30846158280031]
Task planning for embodied AI has been one of the most challenging problems.
We propose a task-agnostic method named 'planning as in-painting'
The proposed framework achieves promising performances in various embodied AI tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-02T10:07:17Z) - Data Association Aware POMDP Planning with Hypothesis Pruning
Performance Guarantees [7.928094304325113]
We introduce a pruning-based approach for planning with ambiguous data associations.
Our key contribution is to derive bounds between the value function based on the complete set of hypotheses and the value function based on a pruned-subset of the hypotheses.
We demonstrate how these bounds can both be used to certify any pruning in retrospect and propose a novel approach to determine which hypotheses to prune in order to ensure a predefined limit on the loss.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-03T18:35:01Z) - Quantization for decentralized learning under subspace constraints [61.59416703323886]
We consider decentralized optimization problems where agents have individual cost functions to minimize subject to subspace constraints.
We propose and study an adaptive decentralized strategy where the agents employ differential randomized quantizers to compress their estimates.
The analysis shows that, under some general conditions on the quantization noise, the strategy is stable both in terms of mean-square error and average bit rate.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-16T09:38:38Z) - Planning with Dynamically Estimated Action Costs [2.8326418377665346]
Information about action costs is critical for real-world AI planning applications.
Recent approaches use black-box external action cost estimators, often learned from data, that are applied during the planning phase.
We suggest a generalization of deterministic planning with action costs that allows selecting between multiple estimators for action cost.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-08T21:10:37Z) - D2A-BSP: Distilled Data Association Belief Space Planning with
Performance Guarantees Under Budget Constraints [6.62472687864754]
Unresolved data association in ambiguous and perceptually aliased environments leads to multi-modal hypotheses on both the robot's and the environment state.
We present a novel approach that utilizes only a distilled subset of hypotheses to solve BSP problems while reasoning about data association.
We then demonstrate our approach in an extremely aliased environment, where we manage to significantly reduce computation time without compromising on the quality of the solution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-10T11:13:24Z) - Counterfactual Explanations as Interventions in Latent Space [62.997667081978825]
Counterfactual explanations aim to provide to end users a set of features that need to be changed in order to achieve a desired outcome.
Current approaches rarely take into account the feasibility of actions needed to achieve the proposed explanations.
We present Counterfactual Explanations as Interventions in Latent Space (CEILS), a methodology to generate counterfactual explanations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-14T20:48:48Z) - Robust Finite-State Controllers for Uncertain POMDPs [25.377873201375515]
Uncertain partially observable decision processes (uPOMDPs) allow the probabilistic transition observation functions of standard POMDPs to belong to an uncertainty set.
We develop an algorithm to compute finite-memory policies for uPOMDPs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-24T02:58:50Z) - On Bayesian Search for the Feasible Space Under Computationally
Expensive Constraints [0.0]
We propose a novel acquisition function that combines the probability that a solution lies at the boundary between feasible and infeasible spaces.
Experiments confirmed the efficacy of the proposed function.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-23T10:22:32Z) - The empirical duality gap of constrained statistical learning [115.23598260228587]
We study the study of constrained statistical learning problems, the unconstrained version of which are at the core of virtually all modern information processing.
We propose to tackle the constrained statistical problem overcoming its infinite dimensionality, unknown distributions, and constraints by leveraging finite dimensional parameterizations, sample averages, and duality theory.
We demonstrate the effectiveness and usefulness of this constrained formulation in a fair learning application.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-12T19:12:29Z) - Public Bayesian Persuasion: Being Almost Optimal and Almost Persuasive [57.47546090379434]
We study the public persuasion problem in the general setting with: (i) arbitrary state spaces; (ii) arbitrary action spaces; (iii) arbitrary sender's utility functions.
We provide a quasi-polynomial time bi-criteria approximation algorithm for arbitrary public persuasion problems that, in specific settings, yields a QPTAS.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-12T18:59:18Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.