MRCLens: an MRC Dataset Bias Detection Toolkit

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.08943v1
• Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 21:05:39 GMT
• Title: MRCLens: an MRC Dataset Bias Detection Toolkit
• Authors: Yifan Zhong, Haohan Wang, Eric P. Xing
• Abstract summary: We introduce MRCLens, a toolkit that detects whether biases exist before users train the full model. For the convenience of introducing the toolkit, we also provide a categorization of common biases in MRC.
• Score: 82.44296974850639
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Many recent neural models have shown remarkable empirical results in Machine Reading Comprehension, but evidence suggests sometimes the models take advantage of dataset biases to predict and fail to generalize on out-of-sample data. While many other approaches have been proposed to address this issue from the computation perspective such as new architectures or training procedures, we believe a method that allows researchers to discover biases, and adjust the data or the models in an earlier stage will be beneficial. Thus, we introduce MRCLens, a toolkit that detects whether biases exist before users train the full model. For the convenience of introducing the toolkit, we also provide a categorization of common biases in MRC.

Related papers

• Few-Shot Load Forecasting Under Data Scarcity in Smart Grids: A Meta-Learning Approach [0.18641315013048293]
  This paper proposes adapting an established model-agnostic meta-learning algorithm for short-term load forecasting. The proposed method can rapidly adapt and generalize within any unknown load time series of arbitrary length. The proposed model is evaluated using a dataset of historical load consumption data from real-world consumers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-09T18:59:08Z)
• Predictive Churn with the Set of Good Models [64.05949860750235]
  We study the effect of conflicting predictions over the set of near-optimal machine learning models. We present theoretical results on the expected churn between models within the Rashomon set. We show how our approach can be used to better anticipate, reduce, and avoid churn in consumer-facing applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T16:15:25Z)
• Addressing Bias Through Ensemble Learning and Regularized Fine-Tuning [0.2812395851874055]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive approach using multiple methods to remove bias in AI models. We train multiple models with the counter-bias of the pre-trained model through data splitting, local training, and regularized fine-tuning. We conclude our solution with knowledge distillation that results in a single unbiased neural network.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-01T09:24:36Z)
• Debiasing Multimodal Models via Causal Information Minimization [65.23982806840182]
  We study bias arising from confounders in a causal graph for multimodal data. Robust predictive features contain diverse information that helps a model generalize to out-of-distribution data. We use these features as confounder representations and use them via methods motivated by causal theory to remove bias from models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-28T16:46:14Z)
• Think Twice: Measuring the Efficiency of Eliminating Prediction Shortcuts of Question Answering Models [3.9052860539161918]
  We propose a simple method for measuring a scale of models' reliance on any identified spurious feature. We assess the robustness towards a large set of known and newly found prediction biases for various pre-trained models and debiasing methods in Question Answering (QA) We find that while existing debiasing methods can mitigate reliance on a chosen spurious feature, the OOD performance gains of these methods can not be explained by mitigated reliance on biased features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-11T14:35:00Z)
• Variational Factorization Machines for Preference Elicitation in Large-Scale Recommender Systems [17.050774091903552]
  We propose a variational formulation of factorization machines (FMs) that can be easily optimized using standard mini-batch descent gradient. Our algorithm learns an approximate posterior distribution over the user and item parameters, which leads to confidence intervals over the predictions. We show, using several datasets, that it has comparable or better performance than existing methods in terms of prediction accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T00:06:28Z)
• Synthetic Model Combination: An Instance-wise Approach to Unsupervised Ensemble Learning [92.89846887298852]
  Consider making a prediction over new test data without any opportunity to learn from a training set of labelled data. Give access to a set of expert models and their predictions alongside some limited information about the dataset used to train them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-11T10:20:31Z)
• Imputation-Free Learning from Incomplete Observations [73.15386629370111]
  We introduce the importance of guided gradient descent (IGSGD) method to train inference from inputs containing missing values without imputation. We employ reinforcement learning (RL) to adjust the gradients used to train the models via back-propagation. Our imputation-free predictions outperform the traditional two-step imputation-based predictions using state-of-the-art imputation methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-05T12:44:39Z)
• On the Efficacy of Adversarial Data Collection for Question Answering: Results from a Large-Scale Randomized Study [65.17429512679695]
  In adversarial data collection (ADC), a human workforce interacts with a model in real time, attempting to produce examples that elicit incorrect predictions. Despite ADC's intuitive appeal, it remains unclear when training on adversarial datasets produces more robust models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-02T00:48:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.