Analyzing Bagging Methods for Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.09099v1
• Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 06:30:37 GMT
• Title: Analyzing Bagging Methods for Language Models
• Authors: Pranab Islam, Shaan Khosla, Arthur Lok, Mudit Saxena
• Abstract summary: We perform an analysis of bagging language models and compare single language models to bagged ensembles that are roughly equivalent in terms of final model size. Our ensembling methods are at best roughly equivalent to single LM baselines.
• Score: 0.5161531917413708
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Modern language models leverage increasingly large numbers of parameters to achieve performance on natural language understanding tasks. Ensembling these models in specific configurations for downstream tasks show even further performance improvements. In this paper, we perform an analysis of bagging language models and compare single language models to bagged ensembles that are roughly equivalent in terms of final model size. We explore an array of model bagging configurations for natural language understanding tasks with final ensemble sizes ranging from 300M parameters to 1.5B parameters and determine that our ensembling methods are at best roughly equivalent to single LM baselines. We note other positive effects of bagging and pruning in specific scenarios according to findings in our experiments such as variance reduction and minor performance improvements.

Related papers

• ML-SUPERB 2.0: Benchmarking Multilingual Speech Models Across Modeling Constraints, Languages, and Datasets [106.7760874400261]
  This paper presents ML-SUPERB2.0, which is a new benchmark for evaluating pre-trained SSL and supervised speech models. We find performance improvements over the setup of ML-SUPERB, but performance depends on the downstream model design. Also, we find large performance differences between languages and datasets, suggesting the need for more targeted approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-12T21:01:26Z)
• Diversity-Aware Ensembling of Language Models Based on Topological Data Analysis [3.1734682813501514]
  Existing approaches mostly rely on simple averaging of predictions by ensembles with equal weights for each model. We propose to estimate weights for ensembles of NLP models using not only knowledge of their individual performance but also their similarity to each other.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-22T00:04:21Z)
• Split and Rephrase with Large Language Models [2.499907423888049]
  Split and Rephrase (SPRP) task consists in splitting complex sentences into a sequence of shorter grammatical sentences. We evaluate large language models on the task, showing that they can provide large improvements over the state of the art on the main metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-18T10:16:37Z)
• Mixture-of-Linguistic-Experts Adapters for Improving and Interpreting Pre-trained Language Models [22.977852629450346]
  We propose a method that combines two popular research areas by injecting linguistic structures into pre-trained language models. In our approach, parallel adapter modules encoding different linguistic structures are combined using a novel Mixture-of-Linguistic-Experts architecture. Our experiment results show that our approach can outperform state-of-the-art PEFT methods with a comparable number of parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T23:29:06Z)
• BLESS: Benchmarking Large Language Models on Sentence Simplification [55.461555829492866]
  We present BLESS, a performance benchmark of the most recent state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) on the task of text simplification (TS) We assess a total of 44 models, differing in size, architecture, pre-training methods, and accessibility, on three test sets from different domains (Wikipedia, news, and medical) under a few-shot setting. Our evaluation indicates that the best LLMs, despite not being trained on TS, perform comparably with state-of-the-art TS baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T12:18:17Z)
• A Generative Language Model for Few-shot Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis [90.24921443175514]
  We focus on aspect-based sentiment analysis, which involves extracting aspect term, category, and predicting their corresponding polarities. We propose to reformulate the extraction and prediction tasks into the sequence generation task, using a generative language model with unidirectional attention. Our approach outperforms the previous state-of-the-art (based on BERT) on average performance by a large margins in few-shot and full-shot settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-11T18:31:53Z)
• Probing Structured Pruning on Multilingual Pre-trained Models: Settings, Algorithms, and Efficiency [62.0887259003594]
  This work investigates three aspects of structured pruning on multilingual pre-trained language models: settings, algorithms, and efficiency. Experiments on nine downstream tasks show several counter-intuitive phenomena. We present Dynamic Sparsification, a simple approach that allows training the model once and adapting to different model sizes at inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-06T06:29:52Z)
• PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways [180.69584031908113]
  We trained a 540-billion parameter, densely activated, Transformer language model, which we call Pathways Language Model PaLM. We trained PaLM on 6144 TPU v4 chips using Pathways, a new ML system which enables highly efficient training across multiple TPU Pods. We demonstrate continued benefits of scaling by achieving state-of-the-art few-shot learning results on hundreds of language understanding and generation benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-05T16:11:45Z)
• Scaling Language Models: Methods, Analysis & Insights from Training Gopher [83.98181046650664]
  We present an analysis of Transformer-based language model performance across a wide range of model scales. Gains from scale are largest in areas such as reading comprehension, fact-checking, and the identification of toxic language. We discuss the application of language models to AI safety and the mitigation of downstream harms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-08T19:41:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.