Diversity-Aware Ensembling of Language Models Based on Topological Data Analysis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.14184v1
• Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 00:04:21 GMT
• Title: Diversity-Aware Ensembling of Language Models Based on Topological Data Analysis
• Authors: Polina Proskura, Alexey Zaytsev
• Abstract summary: Existing approaches mostly rely on simple averaging of predictions by ensembles with equal weights for each model. We propose to estimate weights for ensembles of NLP models using not only knowledge of their individual performance but also their similarity to each other.
• Score: 3.1734682813501514
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Ensembles are important tools for improving the performance of machine learning models. In cases related to natural language processing, ensembles boost the performance of a method due to multiple large models available in open source. However, existing approaches mostly rely on simple averaging of predictions by ensembles with equal weights for each model, ignoring differences in the quality and conformity of models. We propose to estimate weights for ensembles of NLP models using not only knowledge of their individual performance but also their similarity to each other. By adopting distance measures based on Topological Data Analysis (TDA), we improve our ensemble. The quality improves for both text classification accuracy and relevant uncertainty estimation.

Related papers

• Relation-based Counterfactual Data Augmentation and Contrastive Learning for Robustifying Natural Language Inference Models [0.0]
  We propose a method in which we use token-based and sentence-based augmentation methods to generate counterfactual sentence pairs. We show that the proposed method can improve the performance and robustness of the NLI model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-28T03:43:25Z)
• Dynamic Post-Hoc Neural Ensemblers [55.15643209328513]
  In this study, we explore employing neural networks as ensemble methods. Motivated by the risk of learning low-diversity ensembles, we propose regularizing the model by randomly dropping base model predictions. We demonstrate this approach lower bounds the diversity within the ensemble, reducing overfitting and improving generalization capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-06T15:25:39Z)
• Has Your Pretrained Model Improved? A Multi-head Posterior Based Approach [25.927323251675386]
  We leverage the meta-features associated with each entity as a source of worldly knowledge and employ entity representations from the models. We propose using the consistency between these representations and the meta-features as a metric for evaluating pre-trained models. Our method's effectiveness is demonstrated across various domains, including models with relational datasets, large language models and image models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-02T17:08:26Z)
• Split and Rephrase with Large Language Models [2.499907423888049]
  Split and Rephrase (SPRP) task consists in splitting complex sentences into a sequence of shorter grammatical sentences. We evaluate large language models on the task, showing that they can provide large improvements over the state of the art on the main metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-18T10:16:37Z)
• Dataless Knowledge Fusion by Merging Weights of Language Models [51.8162883997512]
  Fine-tuning pre-trained language models has become the prevalent paradigm for building downstream NLP models. This creates a barrier to fusing knowledge across individual models to yield a better single model. We propose a dataless knowledge fusion method that merges models in their parameter space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-19T20:46:43Z)
• On the Compositional Generalization Gap of In-Context Learning [73.09193595292233]
  We look at the gap between the in-distribution (ID) and out-of-distribution (OOD) performance of such models in semantic parsing tasks with in-context learning. We evaluate four model families, OPT, BLOOM, CodeGen and Codex on three semantic parsing datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-15T19:56:37Z)
• Investigating Ensemble Methods for Model Robustness Improvement of Text Classifiers [66.36045164286854]
  We analyze a set of existing bias features and demonstrate there is no single model that works best for all the cases. By choosing an appropriate bias model, we can obtain a better robustness result than baselines with a more sophisticated model design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-28T17:52:10Z)
• Analyzing Bagging Methods for Language Models [0.5161531917413708]
  We perform an analysis of bagging language models and compare single language models to bagged ensembles that are roughly equivalent in terms of final model size. Our ensembling methods are at best roughly equivalent to single LM baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-19T06:30:37Z)
• Model-agnostic multi-objective approach for the evolutionary discovery of mathematical models [55.41644538483948]
  In modern data science, it is more interesting to understand the properties of the model, which parts could be replaced to obtain better results. We use multi-objective evolutionary optimization for composite data-driven model learning to obtain the algorithm's desired properties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-07T11:17:09Z)
• Ensemble Learning-Based Approach for Improving Generalization Capability of Machine Reading Comprehension Systems [0.7614628596146599]
  Machine Reading (MRC) is an active field in natural language processing with many successful developed models in recent years. Despite their high in-distribution accuracy, these models suffer from two issues: high training cost and low out-of-distribution accuracy. In this paper, we investigate the effect of ensemble learning approach to improve generalization of MRC systems without retraining a big model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-01T11:11:17Z)
• Interpretable Multi-dataset Evaluation for Named Entity Recognition [110.64368106131062]
  We present a general methodology for interpretable evaluation for the named entity recognition (NER) task. The proposed evaluation method enables us to interpret the differences in models and datasets, as well as the interplay between them. By making our analysis tool available, we make it easy for future researchers to run similar analyses and drive progress in this area.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-13T10:53:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.