Empowering Participation Within Structures of Dependency

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.09126v1
• Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 08:50:31 GMT
• Title: Empowering Participation Within Structures of Dependency
• Authors: Aakash Gautam, Deborah Tatar
• Abstract summary: We reflect on our five-year engagement with survivors of sex trafficking in Nepal. We sought to bring change by exploring possibilities based on the survivors' existing assets. We highlight the challenges we faced, uncovering actions that PD practitioners can take.
• Score: 2.0305676256390934
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Participatory Design (PD) seeks political change to support people's democratic control over processes, solutions, and, in general, matters of concern to them. A particular challenge remains in supporting vulnerable groups to gain power and control when they are dependent on organizations and external structures. We reflect on our five-year engagement with survivors of sex trafficking in Nepal and an anti-trafficking organization that supports the survivors. Arguing that the prevalence of deficit perspective in the setting promotes dependency and robs the survivors' agency, we sought to bring change by exploring possibilities based on the survivors' existing assets. Three configurations illuminate how our design decisions and collective exploration operate to empower participation while attending to the substantial power implicitly and explicitly manifest in existing structures. We highlight the challenges we faced, uncovering actions that PD practitioners can take, including an emphasis on collaborative entanglements, attending to contingent factors, and encouraging provisional collectives.

Related papers

• Do Responsible AI Artifacts Advance Stakeholder Goals? Four Key Barriers Perceived by Legal and Civil Stakeholders [59.17981603969404]
  The responsible AI (RAI) community has introduced numerous processes and artifacts to facilitate transparency and support the governance of AI systems. We conduct semi-structured interviews with 19 government, legal, and civil society stakeholders who inform policy and advocacy around responsible AI efforts. We organize these beliefs into four barriers that help explain how RAI artifacts may (inadvertently) reconfigure power relations across civil society, government, and industry.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-22T00:14:37Z)
• Studying Up Public Sector AI: How Networks of Power Relations Shape Agency Decisions Around AI Design and Use [29.52245155918532]
  We study public sector AI around those who have the power and responsibility to make decisions about the role that AI tools will play in their agency. Our findings shed light on how infrastructural, legal, and social factors create barriers and disincentives to the involvement of a broader range of stakeholders in decisions about AI design and adoption.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-21T02:31:26Z)
• A Semantic Approach to Decidability in Epistemic Planning (Extended Version) [72.77805489645604]
  We use a novel semantic approach to achieve decidability. Specifically, we augment the logic of knowledge S5$_n$ and with an interaction axiom called (knowledge) commutativity. We prove that our framework admits a finitary non-fixpoint characterization of common knowledge, which is of independent interest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-28T11:26:26Z)
• When to Ask for Help: Proactive Interventions in Autonomous Reinforcement Learning [57.53138994155612]
  A long-term goal of reinforcement learning is to design agents that can autonomously interact and learn in the world. A critical challenge is the presence of irreversible states which require external assistance to recover from, such as when a robot arm has pushed an object off of a table. We propose an algorithm that efficiently learns to detect and avoid states that are irreversible, and proactively asks for help in case the agent does enter them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-19T17:57:24Z)
• Inverse Online Learning: Understanding Non-Stationary and Reactionary Policies [79.60322329952453]
  We show how to develop interpretable representations of how agents make decisions. By understanding the decision-making processes underlying a set of observed trajectories, we cast the policy inference problem as the inverse to this online learning problem. We introduce a practical algorithm for retrospectively estimating such perceived effects, alongside the process through which agents update them. Through application to the analysis of UNOS organ donation acceptance decisions, we demonstrate that our approach can bring valuable insights into the factors that govern decision processes and how they change over time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-14T17:40:42Z)
• Fragments of the Past: Curating Peer Support with Perpetrators of Domestic Violence [88.37416552778178]
  We report on a ten-month study where we worked with six support workers and eighteen perpetrators in the design and deployment of Fragments of the Past. We share how crafting digitally-augmented artefacts - 'fragments' - of experiences of desisting from violence can translate messages for motivation and rapport between peers. These insights provide the basis for practical considerations for future network design with challenging populations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-09T22:57:43Z)
• Nine Recommendations for Decision Aid Implementation from the Clinician Perspective [0.0]
  Time pressure and patient characteristics were cited as major barriers by 55% of the clinicians we interviewed. Structural factors such as external quotas for certain treatment procedures were also considered as barriers by 44% of the clinicians. Our findings suggest a role for external stakeholders such as healthcare insurers in creating economic incentives to facilitate implementation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-21T13:40:23Z)
• Inverse Active Sensing: Modeling and Understanding Timely Decision-Making [111.07204912245841]
  We develop a framework for the general setting of evidence-based decision-making under endogenous, context-dependent time pressure. We demonstrate how it enables modeling intuitive notions of surprise, suspense, and optimality in decision strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-25T02:30:45Z)
• p for political: Participation Without Agency Is Not Enough [2.0305676256390934]
  We reflect on the results of a series of activities aimed at supporting agentic-future-envisionment with a group of sex-trafficking survivors in Nepal. We argue that building participant agency on the small and personal interactions is necessary before demanding larger Political participation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-07T14:59:59Z)
• Crafting, Communality, and Computing: Building on Existing Strengths To Support a Vulnerable Population [3.4376560669160394]
  We present reflections from introducing a voice-annotated web application to a group of sex-trafficking survivors in Nepal. The web application tapped into and built upon two elements of pre-existing strengths possessed by the survivors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-04T13:17:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.