Empowering Participation Within Structures of Dependency

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.09126v1
• Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 08:50:31 GMT
• Title: Empowering Participation Within Structures of Dependency
• Abstract summary: We reflect on our five-year engagement with survivors of sex trafficking in Nepal. We sought to bring change by exploring possibilities based on the survivors' existing assets. We highlight the challenges we faced, uncovering actions that PD practitioners can take.
• Score: 2.0305676256390934
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Participatory Design (PD) seeks political change to support people's democratic control over processes, solutions, and, in general, matters of concern to them. A particular challenge remains in supporting vulnerable groups to gain power and control when they are dependent on organizations and external structures. We reflect on our five-year engagement with survivors of sex trafficking in Nepal and an anti-trafficking organization that supports the survivors. Arguing that the prevalence of deficit perspective in the setting promotes dependency and robs the survivors' agency, we sought to bring change by exploring possibilities based on the survivors' existing assets. Three configurations illuminate how our design decisions and collective exploration operate to empower participation while attending to the substantial power implicitly and explicitly manifest in existing structures. We highlight the challenges we faced, uncovering actions that PD practitioners can take, including an emphasis on collaborative entanglements, attending to contingent factors, and encouraging provisional collectives.

Related papers

• Co-Evolution in Agentic Systems: Toward Self-Directed Evolution Beyond Human Design [55.30329388138526]
  This survey focuses on co-evolution in agentic systems, a multi-component form of self-evolution in which multiple agents and their environment impose adaptive pressure on one another.<n>To organize existing papers, we propose a progressive three-stage taxonomy that traces how the system gradually sheds human-engineered constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-10T23:10:40Z)
• Adversarial Attacks for Good: A Survey of Proactive Protection across the Visual Content Lifecycle [65.6642776933861]
  This survey examines the protective paradigm that has grown around this intervention point.<n>We find that most protections are still validated mainly against static or weakly adaptive adversaries.<n>We close by consolidating cross-stage countermeasures and open problems for robust, composable, and deployable owner-side protection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-05T00:46:50Z)
• Beyond Individual Intelligence: Surveying Collaboration, Failure Attribution, and Self-Evolution in LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems [65.90791804095561]
  Multi-agent systems address this through structured collaboration among specialized agents, but tighter coordination amplifies a less explored risk.<n>Existing surveys cover individual agent capabilities, multi-agent collaboration, or agent self-evolution separately, leaving the causal dependencies among them unexamined.<n>This survey provides a unified review organized around four causally linked stages, which we term the LIFE progression: Lay the capability foundation, Integrate agents through collaboration, Find faults through attribution, and Evolve through autonomous self-improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-14T14:36:13Z)
• Visioning Human-Agentic AI Teaming: Continuity, Tension, and Future Research [2.5609468301546485]
  Agentic systems capable of open-ended action trajectories introduce structural uncertainty into human-AI teaming.<n>Team Situation Awareness (Team SA) theory presumes that shared awareness, once achieved, will support coordinated action through iterative updating.<n>Our argument unfolds in two stages: first, we extend Team SA to reconceptualize both human and AI awareness under open-ended agency.<n>Second, we interrogate whether the dynamic processes traditionally assumed to stabilize teaming in relational interaction, cognitive learning, and coordination and control continue to function under adaptive autonomy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-05T02:40:42Z)
• Making LLMs Reliable When It Matters Most: A Five-Layer Architecture for High-Stakes Decisions [51.56484100374058]
  Current large language models (LLMs) excel in verifiable domains where outputs can be checked before action but prove less reliable for high-stakes strategic decisions with uncertain outcomes.<n>This gap, driven by mutually cognitive biases in both humans and artificial intelligence (AI) systems, threatens the defensibility of valuations and sustainability of investments in the sector.<n>This report describes a framework emerging from systematic qualitative assessment across 7 frontier-grade LLMs and 3 market-facing venture vignettes under time pressure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-10T22:24:21Z)
• Human-AI Teaming Co-Learning in Military Operations [0.0]
  This research proposes the design of a trustworthy co-learning model for human-AI teaming in military operations.<n>It encompasses a continuous and bidirectional exchange of insights between the human and AI agents as they jointly adapt to evolving battlefield conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-02T09:01:01Z)
• Unraveling Human-AI Teaming: A Review and Outlook [2.3396455015352258]
  Artificial Intelligence (AI) is advancing at an unprecedented pace, with clear potential to enhance decision-making and productivity. Yet, the collaborative decision-making process between humans and AI remains underdeveloped, often falling short of its transformative possibilities. This paper explores the evolution of AI agents from passive tools to active collaborators in human-AI teams, emphasizing their ability to learn, adapt, and operate autonomously in complex environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-08T07:37:25Z)
• Do Responsible AI Artifacts Advance Stakeholder Goals? Four Key Barriers Perceived by Legal and Civil Stakeholders [59.17981603969404]
  The responsible AI (RAI) community has introduced numerous processes and artifacts to facilitate transparency and support the governance of AI systems. We conduct semi-structured interviews with 19 government, legal, and civil society stakeholders who inform policy and advocacy around responsible AI efforts. We organize these beliefs into four barriers that help explain how RAI artifacts may (inadvertently) reconfigure power relations across civil society, government, and industry.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-22T00:14:37Z)
• QuadrupedGPT: Towards a Versatile Quadruped Agent in Open-ended Worlds [51.05639500325598]
  We introduce QuadrupedGPT, designed to follow diverse commands with agility comparable to that of a pet. Our agent shows proficiency in handling diverse tasks and intricate instructions, representing a significant step toward the development of versatile quadruped agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T12:14:24Z)
• Studying Up Public Sector AI: How Networks of Power Relations Shape Agency Decisions Around AI Design and Use [29.52245155918532]
  We study public sector AI around those who have the power and responsibility to make decisions about the role that AI tools will play in their agency. Our findings shed light on how infrastructural, legal, and social factors create barriers and disincentives to the involvement of a broader range of stakeholders in decisions about AI design and adoption.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-21T02:31:26Z)
• A Semantic Approach to Decidability in Epistemic Planning (Extended Version) [72.77805489645604]
  We use a novel semantic approach to achieve decidability. Specifically, we augment the logic of knowledge S5$_n$ and with an interaction axiom called (knowledge) commutativity. We prove that our framework admits a finitary non-fixpoint characterization of common knowledge, which is of independent interest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-28T11:26:26Z)
• When to Ask for Help: Proactive Interventions in Autonomous Reinforcement Learning [57.53138994155612]
  A long-term goal of reinforcement learning is to design agents that can autonomously interact and learn in the world. A critical challenge is the presence of irreversible states which require external assistance to recover from, such as when a robot arm has pushed an object off of a table. We propose an algorithm that efficiently learns to detect and avoid states that are irreversible, and proactively asks for help in case the agent does enter them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-19T17:57:24Z)
• Inverse Online Learning: Understanding Non-Stationary and Reactionary Policies [79.60322329952453]
  We show how to develop interpretable representations of how agents make decisions. By understanding the decision-making processes underlying a set of observed trajectories, we cast the policy inference problem as the inverse to this online learning problem. We introduce a practical algorithm for retrospectively estimating such perceived effects, alongside the process through which agents update them. Through application to the analysis of UNOS organ donation acceptance decisions, we demonstrate that our approach can bring valuable insights into the factors that govern decision processes and how they change over time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-14T17:40:42Z)
• Fragments of the Past: Curating Peer Support with Perpetrators of Domestic Violence [88.37416552778178]
  We report on a ten-month study where we worked with six support workers and eighteen perpetrators in the design and deployment of Fragments of the Past. We share how crafting digitally-augmented artefacts - 'fragments' - of experiences of desisting from violence can translate messages for motivation and rapport between peers. These insights provide the basis for practical considerations for future network design with challenging populations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-09T22:57:43Z)
• Nine Recommendations for Decision Aid Implementation from the Clinician Perspective [0.0]
  Time pressure and patient characteristics were cited as major barriers by 55% of the clinicians we interviewed. Structural factors such as external quotas for certain treatment procedures were also considered as barriers by 44% of the clinicians. Our findings suggest a role for external stakeholders such as healthcare insurers in creating economic incentives to facilitate implementation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-21T13:40:23Z)
• Inverse Active Sensing: Modeling and Understanding Timely Decision-Making [111.07204912245841]
  We develop a framework for the general setting of evidence-based decision-making under endogenous, context-dependent time pressure. We demonstrate how it enables modeling intuitive notions of surprise, suspense, and optimality in decision strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-25T02:30:45Z)
• p for political: Participation Without Agency Is Not Enough [2.0305676256390934]
  We reflect on the results of a series of activities aimed at supporting agentic-future-envisionment with a group of sex-trafficking survivors in Nepal. We argue that building participant agency on the small and personal interactions is necessary before demanding larger Political participation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-07T14:59:59Z)
• Crafting, Communality, and Computing: Building on Existing Strengths To Support a Vulnerable Population [3.4376560669160394]
  We present reflections from introducing a voice-annotated web application to a group of sex-trafficking survivors in Nepal. The web application tapped into and built upon two elements of pre-existing strengths possessed by the survivors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-04T13:17:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.