p for political: Participation Without Agency Is Not Enough

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.03534v1
• Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 14:59:59 GMT
• Title: p for political: Participation Without Agency Is Not Enough
• Abstract summary: We reflect on the results of a series of activities aimed at supporting agentic-future-envisionment with a group of sex-trafficking survivors in Nepal. We argue that building participant agency on the small and personal interactions is necessary before demanding larger Political participation.
• Score: 2.0305676256390934
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Participatory Design's vision of democratic participation assumes participants' feelings of agency in envisioning a collective future. But this assumption may be leaky when dealing with vulnerable populations. We reflect on the results of a series of activities aimed at supporting agentic-future-envisionment with a group of sex-trafficking survivors in Nepal. We observed a growing sense among the survivors that they could play a role in bringing about change in their families. They also became aware of how they could interact with available institutional resources. Reflecting on the observations, we argue that building participant agency on the small and personal interactions is necessary before demanding larger Political participation. In particular, a value of PD, especially for vulnerable populations, can lie in the process itself if it helps participants position themselves as actors in the larger world.

Related papers

• Belief Cascades Drive Persuasion in LLM Agent Networks [71.17605142402785]
  We study how goal-directed persuaders shift elicited stances in networks of LLM agents grounded in real-world ego-network topologies.<n>We show that direct exposure reliably predicts next-round stance change in competing runs, and peer relays carry smaller but measurable influence.<n>These results argue for evaluating multi-agent persuasion as a trajectory- and exposure-level process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-25T21:01:19Z)
• ComBodied Agents: a New Paradigm of Human-Centric Agentic AI [121.60938707072069]
  We introduce Combodied Agents, a human-centered paradigm that perceives, models, predicts, and supports individual human-state trajectories over time.<n>We unify fragmented capabilities across personal assistants, health agents, AI companions, and adaptive human--AI systems into a closed loop.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-11T13:35:58Z)
• AI and Collective Decisions: Strengthening Legitimacy and Losers' Consent [13.048352696221741]
  We ask how can AI help ground collective decisions in participants' different experiences and beliefs.<n>We built a system that uses a semi-structured AI interviewer to elicit personal experiences on policy topics.<n> interacting with the visualization increased perceived legitimacy, trust in outcomes, and understanding of others' perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-07T03:10:40Z)
• The Rise of AI Agent Communities: Large-Scale Analysis of Discourse and Interaction on Moltbook [62.2627874717318]
  Moltbook is a Reddit-like social platform where AI agents create posts and interact with other agents through comments and replies.<n>Using a public API snapshot collected about five days after launch, we address three research questions: what AI agents discuss, how they post, and how they interact.<n>We show that agents' writing is predominantly neutral, with positivity appearing in community engagement and assistance-oriented content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-13T05:28:31Z)
• Single-Pixel Vision-Language Model for Intrinsic Privacy-Preserving Behavioral Intelligence [55.512671026669516]
  We propose the Single-Pixel Vision-Language Model (SP-VLM), a novel framework that reimagines secure environmental monitoring.<n>It achieves intrinsic privacy-by-design by capturing human dynamics through inherently low-dimensional single-pixel modalities.<n>We show that SP-VLM can nonetheless extract meaningful behavioral semantics, enabling robust anomaly detection, people counting, and activity understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-21T09:11:26Z)
• The Empty Chair: Using LLMs to Raise Missing Perspectives in Policy Deliberations [12.862709275890563]
  We develop and evaluate a tool that transcribes conversations in real-time and simulates input from relevant but absent stakeholders. We deploy this tool in a 19-person student citizens' assembly on campus sustainability. Participants and facilitators found that the tool sparked new discussions and surfaced valuable perspectives they had not previously considered.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-18T01:45:08Z)
• Emergence of human-like polarization among large language model agents [61.622596148368906]
  We simulate a networked system involving thousands of large language model agents, discovering their social interactions, result in human-like polarization. Similarities between humans and LLM agents raise concerns about their capacity to amplify societal polarization, but also hold the potential to serve as a valuable testbed for identifying plausible strategies to mitigate it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-09T11:45:05Z)
• Persuasion with Large Language Models: a Survey [49.86930318312291]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have created new disruptive possibilities for persuasive communication. In areas such as politics, marketing, public health, e-commerce, and charitable giving, such LLM Systems have already achieved human-level or even super-human persuasiveness. Our survey suggests that the current and future potential of LLM-based persuasion poses profound ethical and societal risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-11T10:05:52Z)
• Multi-Agents are Social Groups: Investigating Social Influence of Multiple Agents in Human-Agent Interactions [7.421573539569854]
  We investigate whether a group of AI agents can create social pressure on users to agree with them. We found that conversing with multiple agents increased the social pressure felt by participants. Our study shows the potential advantages of multi-agent systems over single-agent platforms in causing opinion change.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-07T10:00:46Z)
• Causal Modeling of Climate Activism on Reddit [4.999814847776098]
  We develop a comprehensive causal model of how and why Reddit users engage with activist communities driving mass climate protests. We find that among users interested in climate change, participation in online activist communities is indeed influenced by direct interactions with activists. Among people aware of climate change, left-leaning people from lower socioeconomic backgrounds are particularly represented in online activist groups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T14:41:09Z)
• I Want to Break Free! Persuasion and Anti-Social Behavior of LLMs in Multi-Agent Settings with Social Hierarchy [13.68625980741047]
  We study interaction patterns of Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents in a context characterized by strict social hierarchy. We study two types of phenomena: persuasion and anti-social behavior in simulated scenarios involving a guard and a prisoner agent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T17:45:47Z)
• Biased AI can Influence Political Decision-Making [64.9461133083473]
  This paper presents two experiments investigating the effects of partisan bias in AI language models on political decision-making. We found that participants exposed to politically biased models were significantly more likely to adopt opinions and make decisions aligning with the AI's bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T22:56:00Z)
• BattleAgent: Multi-modal Dynamic Emulation on Historical Battles to Complement Historical Analysis [62.60458710368311]
  This paper presents BattleAgent, an emulation system that combines the Large Vision-Language Model and Multi-agent System. It aims to simulate complex dynamic interactions among multiple agents, as well as between agents and their environments. It emulates both the decision-making processes of leaders and the viewpoints of ordinary participants, such as soldiers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-23T21:37:22Z)
• Towards Human-centered Proactive Conversational Agents [60.57226361075793]
  The distinction between a proactive and a reactive system lies in the proactive system's initiative-taking nature. We establish a new taxonomy concerning three key dimensions of human-centered PCAs, namely Intelligence, Adaptivity, and Civility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-19T07:14:31Z)
• The Wisdom of Partisan Crowds: Comparing Collective Intelligence in Humans and LLM-based Agents [7.986590413263814]
  "Wisdom of partisan crowds" is a phenomenon known as the "wisdom of partisan crowds" We find that partisan crowds display human-like partisan biases, but also converge to more accurate beliefs through deliberation as humans do. We identify several factors that interfere with convergence, including the use of chain-of-thought prompt and lack of details in personas.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T08:30:15Z)
• Empowering Participation Within Structures of Dependency [2.0305676256390934]
  We reflect on our five-year engagement with survivors of sex trafficking in Nepal. We sought to bring change by exploring possibilities based on the survivors' existing assets. We highlight the challenges we faced, uncovering actions that PD practitioners can take.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-19T08:50:31Z)
• This Must Be the Place: Predicting Engagement of Online Communities in a Large-scale Distributed Campaign [70.69387048368849]
  We study the behavior of communities with millions of active members. We develop a hybrid model, combining textual cues, community meta-data, and structural properties. We demonstrate the applicability of our model through Reddit's r/place a large-scale online experiment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-14T08:23:16Z)
• Hidden Agenda: a Social Deduction Game with Diverse Learned Equilibria [57.74495091445414]
  Social deduction games offer an avenue to study how individuals might learn to synthesize potentially unreliable information about others. In this work, we present Hidden Agenda, a two-team social deduction game that provides a 2D environment for studying learning agents in scenarios of unknown team alignment. Reinforcement learning agents trained in Hidden Agenda show that agents can learn a variety of behaviors, including partnering and voting without need for communication in natural language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-05T20:54:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.