Mimetic Models: Ethical Implications of AI that Acts Like You

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.09394v1
• Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 16:41:36 GMT
• Title: Mimetic Models: Ethical Implications of AI that Acts Like You
• Authors: Reid McIlroy-Young, Jon Kleinberg, Siddhartha Sen, Solon Barocas, Ashton Anderson
• Abstract summary: An emerging theme in artificial intelligence research is the creation of models to simulate the decisions and behavior of specific people. We develop a framework for characterizing the ethical and social issues raised by their growing availability.
• Score: 5.843033621853535
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: An emerging theme in artificial intelligence research is the creation of models to simulate the decisions and behavior of specific people, in domains including game-playing, text generation, and artistic expression. These models go beyond earlier approaches in the way they are tailored to individuals, and the way they are designed for interaction rather than simply the reproduction of fixed, pre-computed behaviors. We refer to these as mimetic models, and in this paper we develop a framework for characterizing the ethical and social issues raised by their growing availability. Our framework includes a number of distinct scenarios for the use of such models, and considers the impacts on a range of different participants, including the target being modeled, the operator who deploys the model, and the entities that interact with it.

Related papers

• Accounting for AI and Users Shaping One Another: The Role of Mathematical Models [17.89344451611069]
  We argue for the development of formal interaction models which mathematically specify how AI and users shape one another. We call for the community to leverage formal interaction models when designing, evaluating, or auditing any AI system which interacts with users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-18T17:49:02Z)
• Generative Agent-Based Modeling: Unveiling Social System Dynamics through Coupling Mechanistic Models with Generative Artificial Intelligence [0.5898893619901381]
  We discuss the emerging new opportunity for building feedback-rich computational models of social systems using generative artificial intelligence. Referred to as Generative Agent-Based Models (GABMs), such individual-level models utilize large language models such as ChatGPT to represent human decision-making in social settings. We provide a GABM case in which human behavior can be incorporated in simulation models by coupling a mechanistic model of human interactions with a pre-trained large language model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-20T16:43:05Z)
• Model Synthesis for Zero-Shot Model Attribution [26.835046772924258]
  generative models are shaping various fields such as art, design, and human-computer interaction. We propose a model synthesis technique, which generates numerous synthetic models mimicking the fingerprint patterns of real-world generative models. Our experiments demonstrate that this fingerprint extractor, trained solely on synthetic models, achieves impressive zero-shot generalization on a wide range of real-world generative models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-29T13:00:42Z)
• Foundational Models Defining a New Era in Vision: A Survey and Outlook [151.49434496615427]
  Vision systems to see and reason about the compositional nature of visual scenes are fundamental to understanding our world. The models learned to bridge the gap between such modalities coupled with large-scale training data facilitate contextual reasoning, generalization, and prompt capabilities at test time. The output of such models can be modified through human-provided prompts without retraining, e.g., segmenting a particular object by providing a bounding box, having interactive dialogues by asking questions about an image or video scene or manipulating the robot's behavior through language instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-25T17:59:18Z)
• Foundation Models for Decision Making: Problems, Methods, and Opportunities [124.79381732197649]
  Foundation models pretrained on diverse data at scale have demonstrated extraordinary capabilities in a wide range of vision and language tasks. New paradigms are emerging for training foundation models to interact with other agents and perform long-term reasoning. Research at the intersection of foundation models and decision making holds tremendous promise for creating powerful new systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-07T18:44:07Z)
• Foundation models in brief: A historical, socio-technical focus [2.5991265608180396]
  Foundation models can be disruptive for future AI development by scaling up deep learning. Models achieve state-of-the-art performance on a variety of tasks in domains such as natural language processing and computer vision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-17T22:11:33Z)
• Are Neural Topic Models Broken? [81.15470302729638]
  We study the relationship between automated and human evaluation of topic models. We find that neural topic models fare worse in both respects compared to an established classical method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-28T14:38:50Z)
• Synthetic Model Combination: An Instance-wise Approach to Unsupervised Ensemble Learning [92.89846887298852]
  Consider making a prediction over new test data without any opportunity to learn from a training set of labelled data. Give access to a set of expert models and their predictions alongside some limited information about the dataset used to train them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-11T10:20:31Z)
• DIME: Fine-grained Interpretations of Multimodal Models via Disentangled Local Explanations [119.1953397679783]
  We focus on advancing the state-of-the-art in interpreting multimodal models. Our proposed approach, DIME, enables accurate and fine-grained analysis of multimodal models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-03T20:52:47Z)
• Goal-Aware Prediction: Learning to Model What Matters [105.43098326577434]
  One of the fundamental challenges in using a learned forward dynamics model is the mismatch between the objective of the learned model and that of the downstream planner or policy. We propose to direct prediction towards task relevant information, enabling the model to be aware of the current task and encouraging it to only model relevant quantities of the state space. We find that our method more effectively models the relevant parts of the scene conditioned on the goal, and as a result outperforms standard task-agnostic dynamics models and model-free reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-14T16:42:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.